Theme: Truth

  • RT @ahmed_ashouman: “knowledge, like evolution is the result of survival not jus

    RT @ahmed_ashouman: “knowledge, like evolution is the result of survival not justification. No matter how good you think you’re reasoning,…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 15:58:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269659915154534400

  • Are you claiming anything I have ever said isn’t true? Or are you demonstrating

    Are you claiming anything I have ever said isn’t true? Or are you demonstrating that I’m correct by casting the undesirable as the false? Because that’s the female strategy of undermining the truth. Not that you can help it. It’s genetic. It takes years of training to overcome.

    Reply addressees: @patacar

  • Are you claiming anything I have ever said isn’t true? Or are you demonstrating

    Are you claiming anything I have ever said isn’t true? Or are you demonstrating that I’m correct by casting the undesirable as the false? Because that’s the female strategy of undermining the truth. Not that you can help it. It’s genetic. It takes years of training to overcome.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 15:57:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269659698602610688

    Reply addressees: @patacar

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269619758451904517

  • TRUTH REGARDLESS OF COST” I have to use the truth without compromise regardless

    :TRUTH REGARDLESS OF COST”

    I have to use the truth without compromise regardless of cost. We can make explicit tolerances and exceptions for the un-testimonial and irreciprocal, but we cannot violate reciprocity by stating untruths without violating the promise of the law: in-group reciprocity in display word and deed, regardless of cost. It doesn’t matter if we turn people away. If they are unfit for the truth, unfit for the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, then they are unfit for transcendence into the gods we imagine – and must be either left behind, or ruled, so that they cannot prohibit our transcendence into the gods we imagine.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 12:42:00 UTC

  • TRUTH: (Don’t be dim Sam) Police haven’t the force projection necessary to conta

    TRUTH: (Don’t be dim Sam) Police haven’t the force projection necessary to contain the looters (No they don’t). The looters avoid police, the protesters resist and antagonize them. The police are used to clear protesters once the public response to looting peaks. Simple.

    Reply addressees: @SamHarrisOrg

  • I’d like to discuss p-law with Dworkin and Epstein, I’d have prefer Scalia but i

    I’d like to discuss p-law with Dworkin and Epstein, I’d have prefer Scalia but it’s too late.

    I’d like to discuss mathematical platonism with Roger Penrose but I think the cat is out of the bag or getting there.

    I’d like a round table with the women in math that I respect to ask why women understand what math is better than men, but why men do math so much better than women. I find this fascinating.

    I’d love to debate Sam Harris because I know his weakness (failing.) And I’d like the world to be able to have that discussion.

    I’d love to debate peterson on his use of literary suggestion vs going for stoicism as I thought he originally might. Only because I’d like the public to understand what he’s doing and what the alternatives are.

    Or any of the other nitwits in the IDW, but since most of them are Jewish and it would result in serial humiliation, since they all use the same method of critique but have no solutions except more of the same knitting circle conversation.

    Molyneux won’t debate me. I have a script and audio to put out that will end his rather ridiculous argument and explain why he fails in his arguments and resorts to the tactics he does. I’ve hoped he would engage so I could get him into reciprocity and testimony and away from his sophistry, because he’s a fantastic teacher – the best, with the best reach but it’s proven impossible so. you know. influence begs.

    For historical reasons I don’t really want to debate any one at mises institute, particularly Walter, but I would if the opportunity arose. They won’t survive long – as I predicted -without transforming (as I recommended), and replacing the last generation of propagandists, and I’d rather that they get there on their own.

    I want to debate Hoppe in order to demonstrate we solved social since in three generations. But he correctly views me as an arrogant american with no respect for hierarchy. I mean, I have respect for the queen. after that, it’s all just the art of the duel.

    I don’t rally want to debate christians. It would be interesting to discussion logos with EMJ.

    I’m in violent agreement with Duchesne and Macdonald


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-06 23:04:00 UTC

  • Truth is painful

    Truth is painful.

    Reply addressees: @JesusFactsReal

  • Truth is painful

    Truth is painful.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-06 11:56:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269236641484410881

    Reply addressees: @JesusFactsReal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269191611860180992

  • That’s a technique of lying (NAXALT) to use an unrelated extreme example to atte

    That’s a technique of lying (NAXALT) to use an unrelated extreme example to attempt to undermine a general truth. You are weak. You made us weak. grow up. man up. this is childhood’s end.

    Reply addressees: @johnnythedash @ArielFelidae

  • That’s a technique of lying (NAXALT) to use an unrelated extreme example to atte

    That’s a technique of lying (NAXALT) to use an unrelated extreme example to attempt to undermine a general truth. You are weak. You made us weak. grow up. man up. this is childhood’s end.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-06 05:41:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269142445574455303

    Reply addressees: @johnnythedash @ArielFelidae

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269136639776813057