You might deny the truth by claiming ‘everything after’ is a falsehood but I deal with the science, and of course, as a male, I have less difficulty with system thinking, the truth, and the truth regardless of cost. So you can either make a case that I err – or continue to lie.
Reply addressees: @patacar
Theme: Truth
-
You might deny the truth by claiming ‘everything after’ is a falsehood but I dea
-
You might deny the truth by claiming ‘everything after’ is a falsehood but I dea
You might deny the truth by claiming ‘everything after’ is a falsehood but I deal with the science, and of course, as a male, I have less difficulty with system thinking, the truth, and the truth regardless of cost. So you can either make a case that I err – or continue to lie.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 11:29:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269954669549412353
Reply addressees: @patacar
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269948506560757761
-
Most of the objections we get are from people who try (badly) to create rational
Most of the objections we get are from people who try (badly) to create rational argumetns for rejecting P beause P isn’t accessible to them in Crayon. For those people, John Mark and InTruthVictorious should help you. I can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 11:25:00 UTC
-
You notice that I explain the truth, that men and women evolved empathic(interpe
You notice that I explain the truth, that men and women evolved empathic(interpersonal) and systemic (political) intuitions and that these intuitions affect all judgement. As such the franchise to women like the unpropertied, should have required an additional house of congress.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 11:24:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269953356107264001
Reply addressees: @patacar
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269947463848398849
-
You notice that I explain the truth, that men and women evolved empathic(interpe
You notice that I explain the truth, that men and women evolved empathic(interpersonal) and systemic (political) intuitions and that these intuitions affect all judgement. As such the franchise to women like the unpropertied, should have required an additional house of congress.
Reply addressees: @patacar -
If you were possessed of agency, reason,truth before face, and intellectual hone
If you were possessed of agency, reason,truth before face, and intellectual honesty, you would speak the truth: that men and women are profoundly different as the subject varies from interpersonal (empathy) to political (systems) but compatible and must find truth to compromise.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 11:21:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269952681596145664
Reply addressees: @patacar
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269951847747502080
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@patacar You stated that the rational and empirical truth, for judicial correction was non-rational, emotional, and malicious.
That’s a profound error,demonstrating the uncontrollable female bias, to put face before truth, approval before truth, behavioral stagnation before modification.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1269951847747502080
-
If you were possessed of agency, reason,truth before face, and intellectual hone
If you were possessed of agency, reason,truth before face, and intellectual honesty, you would speak the truth: that men and women are profoundly different as the subject varies from interpersonal (empathy) to political (systems) but compatible and must find truth to compromise.
Reply addressees: @patacar -
You stated that the rational and empirical truth, for judicial correction was no
You stated that the rational and empirical truth, for judicial correction was non-rational, emotional, and malicious.
That’s a profound error,demonstrating the uncontrollable female bias, to put face before truth, approval before truth, behavioral stagnation before modification.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 11:18:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269951847747502080
Reply addressees: @patacar
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269946328513216512
-
You stated that the rational and empirical truth, for judicial correction was no
You stated that the rational and empirical truth, for judicial correction was non-rational, emotional, and malicious.
That’s a profound error,demonstrating the uncontrollable female bias, to put face before truth, approval before truth, behavioral stagnation before modification.
Reply addressees: @patacar -
I do natural law of reciprocity, and testimonial truth by realism, naturalism, o
I do natural law of reciprocity, and testimonial truth by realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, and full accounting. So, sorry. It’s a sort of equal-opportunity methodology for slaying sacred cows regardless of race, creed or culture.
Truth has no mercy.
Learn P-Law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 03:49:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269838938304393217