If you cannot handle the Truth you are unfit for the franchise, unfit to judge, unfit to govern, and unfit to rule those who can.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-11 08:29:00 UTC
Theme: Truth
-
Y’all can hate me for the truth. But the truth is how we solve the problem. We n
Y’all can hate me for the truth. But the truth is how we solve the problem. We need more services in addition to religion. Because only feminine biased personality can tolerate the high cost of denial of reality in exchange for the frictionless extroverted experience of religion.
I SOLVE THE PROBLEM YOU DOUBLE DOWN ON AND FAIL.
(and y’all hate me for it)
Truth is the most powerful weapon.
It’s just an expensive one.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-11 08:10:00 UTC
-
THE TRUTH IS A TEST OF FITNESS FOR GODHOOD Divinely ordained law, evident to man
THE TRUTH IS A TEST OF FITNESS FOR GODHOOD
Divinely ordained law, evident to man, is physical (physics), natural (reciprocity), and evolutionary(self determination in pursuit of immortality, agency, omniscience, omnipotence) law. Every prophet has been a liar. Every philosopher a fool. And Every Scientist a saint. 😉
I just do truth. Truth regardless of cost.
If there are gods, that is their language.
It is only animals who fear the truth, and liars who avoid it. 😉
The secret of pagan western civilization
1 – the primacy of man
2 – the primacy of truth
3 – the primacy of agency
4 – the primacy of self determination
Eliminates the possibility of Authority
And Produces:
5 – Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adversarialism (Markets) in everything as the only possibility of discovering the truth.
Semi-humans can’t do it.
They aren’t evolved enough.
We understand.
We had hope for you.
But you are unfit. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-11 07:00:00 UTC
-
If I take an opportunity to state the blatantly obvious, there isn’t any point i
If I take an opportunity to state the blatantly obvious, there isn’t any point in ambiguity in context.
Argue whether it is true or not.
Not whether you like the decor.
Reply addressees: @nkmommygf -
If I take an opportunity to state the blatantly obvious, there isn’t any point i
If I take an opportunity to state the blatantly obvious, there isn’t any point in ambiguity in context.
Argue whether it is true or not.
Not whether you like the decor.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 21:19:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270827964897337346
Reply addressees: @nkmommygf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270809346377691136
-
for the same reason the faithful can’t: evidence of the falsehood of their exist
for the same reason the faithful can’t: evidence of the falsehood of their existence.
Reply addressees: @EricLiford @Brandon62525390 @realDonaldTrump -
for the same reason the faithful can’t: evidence of the falsehood of their exist
for the same reason the faithful can’t: evidence of the falsehood of their existence.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 21:15:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270826871975002112
Reply addressees: @EricLiford @Brandon62525390 @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270826526364352518
-
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of t
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of the NARRATIVE of history, with the EVIDENCE of history, what the romans wrote, what the germanic wrote, the legal acts, the wills and documents, economic and trade history.
Reply addressees: @Cimbrian400 @AshaLogos -
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of t
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of the NARRATIVE of history, with the EVIDENCE of history, what the romans wrote, what the germanic wrote, the legal acts, the wills and documents, economic and trade history.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 21:14:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270826750679961601
Reply addressees: @Cimbrian400 @AshaLogos
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270826021726683142
-
Three is more intellectual consistency to P than there is to even the foundation
Three is more intellectual consistency to P than there is to even the foundations of mathematics (sets), for the simple reason that it’s constrained by realism, naturalism, and operationalism (actions) in addition to identity, logic, empiricism, incentives, and reciprocity.