The truth is so horribly unbearable, that every one of those thinkers is trying to reject Darwin and Darwin’s explanation for the outrageous success of western civlization. Why is the truth so terrifying to the jewish intellectual tradition of dialectic pilpul and critique? 😉
Reply addressees: @johnnywalkerle2 @AsaZernik @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Theme: Truth
-
The truth is so horribly unbearable, that every one of those thinkers is trying
-
So it took until descartes to restore mathematical realism, and it took cantor a
So it took until descartes to restore mathematical realism, and it took cantor and bohr to set it backward. What’s interesting is that this failure: boaz, freud, cantor, bohr, marx, mises, adorno-fromm, derrida, friedan are the reason for the collapse of thought in the 20th.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 00:58:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276318973865398278
Reply addressees: @johnnywalkerle2 @AsaZernik @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276318347076960256
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@johnnywalkerle2 @AsaZernik @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll Debating Einstein, Bohr, along with say Cantor and with say Hilbert and I would have been interesting because Cantor and Bohr and less so Einstein are primarily responsible for the failure of progress in physics and math. Hilbert didn’t correct them. I think Wolfram is doing it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276318347076960256
-
So it took until descartes to restore mathematical realism, and it took cantor a
So it took until descartes to restore mathematical realism, and it took cantor and bohr to set it backward. What’s interesting is that this failure: boaz, freud, cantor, bohr, marx, mises, adorno-fromm, derrida, friedan are the reason for the collapse of thought in the 20th.
Reply addressees: @johnnywalkerle2 @AsaZernik @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll -
Does it bother you that you’re just a data point in a test of avoidance by ethni
Does it bother you that you’re just a data point in a test of avoidance by ethnic group? I doubt it.
Do you know how few women don’t fail the NAXALT test? Truth vs Approval test? Well, about the same with this test.
Never ever a rational thought. Ever.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 00:53:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276317647282622466
Reply addressees: @InvisibleTL @ashleyblair21 @AsaZernik @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276317104262823939
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@InvisibleTL @ashleyblair21 @AsaZernik @littlebirdll I’m not really ‘trying’. We’re counting how many posts by how many people respond with GSRRM instead of arguments. So far not one. Now interestingly, with Christians can get a ten percent rate at least. And most will at least debate. But with you folks, never happens. Ever.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276317104262823939
-
Does it bother you that you’re just a data point in a test of avoidance by ethni
Does it bother you that you’re just a data point in a test of avoidance by ethnic group? I doubt it.
Do you know how few women don’t fail the NAXALT test? Truth vs Approval test? Well, about the same with this test.
Never ever a rational thought. Ever.
Reply addressees: @InvisibleTL @ashleyblair21 @AsaZernik @littlebirdll -
I’m not really ‘trying’. We’re counting how many posts by how many people respon
I’m not really ‘trying’. We’re counting how many posts by how many people respond with GSRRM instead of arguments. So far not one. Now interestingly, with Christians can get a ten percent rate at least. And most will at least debate. But with you folks, never happens. Ever.
Reply addressees: @InvisibleTL @ashleyblair21 @AsaZernik @littlebirdll -
I’m not really ‘trying’. We’re counting how many posts by how many people respon
I’m not really ‘trying’. We’re counting how many posts by how many people respond with GSRRM instead of arguments. So far not one. Now interestingly, with Christians can get a ten percent rate at least. And most will at least debate. But with you folks, never happens. Ever.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 00:51:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276317104262823939
Reply addressees: @InvisibleTL @ashleyblair21 @AsaZernik @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276314654885711873
-
So you are confirming my thesis, that it’s impossible for you to construct an ho
So you are confirming my thesis, that it’s impossible for you to construct an honest argument? Both because you lack the knowledge to, because you lack the ability, and because you’re cognitively biases do conflate disapproval with falsehood? https://t.co/tfMl0lA47r
Reply addressees: @arbutus_pointBC @ashleyblair21 @AsaZernik @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
-
So you are confirming my thesis, that it’s impossible for you to construct an ho
So you are confirming my thesis, that it’s impossible for you to construct an honest argument? Both because you lack the knowledge to, because you lack the ability, and because you’re cognitively biases do conflate disapproval with falsehood? https://t.co/tfMl0lA47r
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 00:46:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276315906600243200
Reply addressees: @arbutus_pointBC @ashleyblair21 @AsaZernik @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276315031764824064
-
That’s novel (and humorous). Are you saying its false, and if so why? Or are you
That’s novel (and humorous).
Are you saying its false, and if so why?
Or are you just disapproving of the truth?
Reply addressees: @piserwright