Theme: Truth

  • TSM: A PERSPECTIVE TRUTH SPASM MEDIA: MAKING SENSE IN THE 21st CENTURY; INFLUENC

    TSM: A PERSPECTIVE

    TRUTH SPASM MEDIA: MAKING SENSE IN THE 21st CENTURY; INFLUENCING PEOPLE THROUGH PROPER (ACTIONABLE VALUE ADDED) EDUCATION; WHAT SETS US APART? TRUTH

    Sensemaking in the 21st century is an animal of a different color; no, it’s a different species. Take the following quotes from Eric Weinstein from this (*) Rebel Wisdom interview “Glitch in the Matrix II, The Origin of the Intellectual Dark Web,”…

    *****

    “ …breaks the forth wall but is in fact fake, so you’re talking about tertiary and eventually quaternary levels of deception. I don’t think the human mind can do much more than 4 layers of lying.”

    “And that’s what happens in professional wrestling. There’s a real competition for airtime, for fame… but there’s a fake competition which is a scripted series of pretend bouts where the decisions are actually known in advance. And that’s very similar to what I see happening in war and finance, in media and particularly journalism.”

    “We pretend the journalism is actually a search for truth which I find hysterically funny.”

    “There’s been a monopoly effectively on narrative held by the collection of major institutional voices.”

    “Identity is cheaper than labor.”

    – Eric Weinstein

    *****

    … this is THE dismal state of media affairs. Scrapping the entire system would be the move if it weren’t for the infrastructure and loss baked into that course of action. So, a hostile take-over by means of embarrassing out-performance will have to suffice.

    Media companies should have a positive affect and effect in the world; in order to ensure that is the case they must speak truth. What follows is a taste of something new, something lacking; the written word focused on appeals to truth not appeals to emotion; we want our writing to push you to do something, not get you to feel something. We’re here to lead; not manipulate.

    We are in a bad spot: the proceeding are at an all-time low in America: getting married, having children (a kid), starting a business, and moving for a job. On the flip side; depression, anxiety, obesity, and suicide are at all-time highs.

    What precedes is the dismal truth. Something no one wants to hear; but everyone should know [actual news]. It’s high time we learn to keep our eyes on the ball as a nation (we need a culture). We must end the extension of childhood, the infantilization of generations, and the hedonistic economies of the present; NOT because our pursuits are immoral (they ARE, but put that on the back-burner) but because they are destroying our peoples, objectively. Happiness can’t be at the expense of future flourishing; we must account for longer time horizons.

    Traditional media companies are looking for attention; we want action. Evidence of our viewership is to manifest in betterment in the world. Our measure isn’t “eyes on” but “hands on.”

    *****

    THERE ARE ONLY THREE METHODS OF INFLUENCE.

    1 – Via Negativa: Law. (Force) Here is what you may not do, and we will punish those who do otherwise.

    By: Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs.

    2 – Via Positiva: Propaganda (Persuade). Here is what we should and should not do – and we will undermine those who do otherwise.

    By: Academics, Priests, Public Intellectuals, Media.

    3 – Via Permutatio: Reciprocity (Exchange). Here is what we offer in exchange, and what you will miss out on otherwise.

    By: Commerce, Entrepreneurs, Merchants, Craftsmen, Laborers”

    – Curt Doolittle

    *****

    I have spent some time now diving into what I have found to be the only cogent and evolutionarily stable plan for moving American culture forward into the 21st century. The solution comes in the form of Propertarianism: the natural law of reciprocity, the sovereign human, and markets in everything. Propertarianism is a system of measurement (a methodology) to be applied to any and all human interaction. It’s a test of ethical and moral behavior. Passing the test (reciprocal) denotes a lawful action; failure marks actions as prosecutable by law.

    (**)

    Propertariansim solves for the law (via negativa; what you are prohibited from doing) and for cooperation (via permutatio; what permutations of action are reciprocal); or a test of reciprocity {Solves for 2 of the three means of influence [#1 and #3}}. This leaves one facet of influence left. One hole to fill in the area of human influence as to not allow for bad ideas (lies) to seep in.

    Via negativa and via permutatio set the limits and the mode of measure, respectively. What’s missing is what you ought to do, how you ought to act, and what you ought to pay attention to. And while the options are limitless [despite there being very clear limits; it’s a beautiful paradox (a set of limits that allows for infinite cooperative action)] there are clear boundaries on behavior and interaction.

    This is the area Truth Spasm Media plans to operate in. Currently (like our other means of influence) our via positiva (propaganda; persuasion) arm of society is corrupt through and through; not only that but there isn’t any plan to cut out the cancer. The moral relativism permeates the academy (university, college, high and elementary schools), the church, the public intellectual sphere (products of the academy and fame [media exposure]), and the media.

    (***)

    What is required now (present) due to the emergence of technologies curating news content for its users AND/OR the solidification of temperament via feedback loops and echo chambers is a decentralization of media coverage. Not by geography (although that must continue) but more importantly by perspective (viewpoint). And by perspective I don’t mean opinion; I mean devoid of an over arching narrative. The idea is to remove the story that drives news; as that story IS what distorts the individual stories or keeps them from airing in the first place.

    All news that doesn’t fit with-in a preconceived narrative is forewent by news companies as it would hurt their image or interrupt the trajectory of their story. But, their story is NOT yours; it’s not even the story you need to hear; in fact hearing someone fabricate a reality so that it fits neatly into their overarching framework is damaging to your perception of this place, especially when the story is low key fiction (cherry-picked truth).

    We ought to be decentralizing media (news) to allow for high variance journalism with a knack for getting at the truth. And that’s what we’re up to.

    There are a new set of sense-makers emerging from the information laden media landscape because it is becoming harder and harder to decipher what is true, half true, fake news, and/or outright fabrication (lies) by taking in only the typical (traditional) media sources [mostly because they are lying liars with a story to push]. We plan on amplifying and contributing in a large way to these new sense-makers and their sense making apparatus’.

    Truth Spasm Media {TSM} will focus on dissemination of value-added information whilst concentrating on actionable items for its listenership. We believe you ought to be better (be able to DO better) for listening [reading, watching]; this means we have to fulfill what it means to facilitate learning. We are looking to offer you perspectives and tools so that you (we) all may grow.Updated Jul 18, 2020, 9:56 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-18 09:56:00 UTC

  • Events of the Fourth

    Can we please just get a plainly spoken factual breakdown on what happened on the 4th? All I saw is a few short clips of P raising the fist with BLM (or whoever those guys were). Can someone comment and just lay it all out?

    John did a long post about it, a video about it, and a dozen of us have explained it a number of times. And it doesn’t matter what we do. It’s not complicated. We felt the acceleration. We wanted a small event. We expected only a hundred and got more than two hundred from all over the continent. We wanted it in a public place, and with police coverage. And we wanted it in Richmond for Strategic reasons. The 2a people were already going to be there. They didn’t object if we showed up but supported them too. It would be good for everyone’s numbers. Day of we set up security and medical tent. Great security. The 2A group was almost entirely white people – we had whites and non whites with us. It was really, really, hot. We waited through the 2A group speeches. They moved down into the shade because the sun was unbearable. We knew that BLM/Antifa was planning on showing. As we saw in video, some BLM guys showed up. Paid the organizer some money (donation). Started moving toward us. The 2A folk finished their speeches. The organizers gave us the microphone. I started giving my speech. The cops pulled up with an armored riot vehicle. Someone started asking who was a racist on a megaphone. Two fking idiots roman saluted. The BLM and 2A people started chanting and marching on us. We got into pushing and a few blows, and very close to a firefight. (And yeah i thought about ‘heroing’ it but it would have been stupid). A bunch of our guys went to the front and started hugging the 2A people. It worked. Everyone calmed down. I paused then kept on going with my speech. I finished it. There were a lot of 2A people to my left. I assume most people think there were a lot of BLM but it was just two young guys and a lot of 2A people trying to protect their image as race-neutral. So It’s their event we’re riding on. It’s their microphone. Our people were all happy, everything was fine. The 2A guys come up and ask if I”ll talk to the BLM guys. Since we just made peace, I’m not gonna screw that up. The BLM come up and ask if we can talk. Tell me that they wan’t to improve their image since the national thing is not what they represent. I don’t know but I just want to de-escalate and keep everyone happy. I talk locker room nonsense with them a bit about how our differences are rational and due to class sizes, I make the joke about dicks vs agency and everything is calm. I’m doing my ‘be reasonable’ thing. Keep the peace. They say they want to address the crowd. I don’t remember what I was thinking, but at the time I just wanted to prevent another cville, and I didn’t think it was my choice to deny it, and I gave it to them and we all supported them in order to deescalate. They went waaaaay overboard with the chanting but we thought it was a small price to pay. We were not thinking about BLM at all but the 2A folk that we didn’t want to alienate and agitate. In retrospect I should have been smarter but maybe because of the heat and confusion, I didn’t have my wits about me. I shouldn’t have given them the mic, instead just given it to the 2A folk. Same thing would have happened, but It wouldn’t have looked like I was sanctioning it. At that point everyone was happy. We avoided a clash. No cops. No Jail. No legal fees. No bad press even. Just a successful launch and a little exciting drama. We thought we’d had a successful event. We all signed the declaration. I’m pretty heat intolerant because of my health, and I was getting nauseous and started passing out so we went to a restaurant and recovered. We filled the place with our people had a blast, went home, slept an hour, got up and did a few interviews. That night we all went to the campground together. Had a party until late in the night – I talked until I lost my voice. Next morning we had a roundtable video and meeting. We were all happy. And when negative stuff started coming in I thought it was trolls being stupid and silly folk people taking them seriously. We went to breakfast and headed home late morning. I didn’t realize that a victory on the ground for us, was not interpreted as victory online. I had no idea that the troll army would turn on us for optics. I dont think we took it seriously until maybe six or eight hours later. By then the Christians, the nazbois, the catbois, and every other group that was angry we were getting attention was piling on during the usual ‘conservative crab bucket’ where ‘no one can get ahead’. So we just did our usual thing which is ‘man in the arena’ and take it. It blew over in a few days. That’s it. only problem is john got really angry and gave up on the dissident right. “For evey 1 good person on the dissident right there are 1000 trolls who ruin it for all of us – so F–k them”. So I’m missing a front man. And I need a front men, or set of frontmen, to reach normal people. Otherwise, I just have an intellectual, not a political movement. And we just are meeting and organizing the rest of our stuff as usual. So that’s all there is. Really.  

    —“… the right will never …”—

    Well, our experience is y’all have no plan, no strategy, keyboard confidence, great bravado, don’t show, can’t keep your mouths shut if you do, get your a–ses kicked if you do, think you know better about everything, and fall for every trap the left sets for you. If I asked you to show up ready to roll, would you? Of course not. Even though It takes 10k guys to start the ball rolling. You get those guys to show we win. If we can’t we lose. There is only one strategy where we control the situation, and that’s it. 10k to recruit 100k, to produce however many we need. What’s going t happen? Trump will lose the left will animate, they will have a government to defend, them and they’ll eat you all a few at a time because they’ll use the arms of the state to incrementally criminalize everything you do until you can’t do anything. Red flag is just the beginning. What do you guys do? Complain that someone who has a plan, isn’t as stupid as you are, and doesn’t take the bait, and builds political momentum needed for the numbers is ‘shit’ because of optics that matter to you but no one else. I mean – you get the leadership you deserve, and frankly, you’ve got the leadership you deserve: no one, nothing, and certain incremental defeat. So, we need to stay away from you and target only men of means that have jobs, that have assets, that have demonstrated agency because they have jobs and assets, because otherwise, you’ll destroy every possible chance anyone has for saving our people.  

  • Events of the Fourth

    Can we please just get a plainly spoken factual breakdown on what happened on the 4th? All I saw is a few short clips of P raising the fist with BLM (or whoever those guys were). Can someone comment and just lay it all out?

    John did a long post about it, a video about it, and a dozen of us have explained it a number of times. And it doesn’t matter what we do. It’s not complicated. We felt the acceleration. We wanted a small event. We expected only a hundred and got more than two hundred from all over the continent. We wanted it in a public place, and with police coverage. And we wanted it in Richmond for Strategic reasons. The 2a people were already going to be there. They didn’t object if we showed up but supported them too. It would be good for everyone’s numbers. Day of we set up security and medical tent. Great security. The 2A group was almost entirely white people – we had whites and non whites with us. It was really, really, hot. We waited through the 2A group speeches. They moved down into the shade because the sun was unbearable. We knew that BLM/Antifa was planning on showing. As we saw in video, some BLM guys showed up. Paid the organizer some money (donation). Started moving toward us. The 2A folk finished their speeches. The organizers gave us the microphone. I started giving my speech. The cops pulled up with an armored riot vehicle. Someone started asking who was a racist on a megaphone. Two fking idiots roman saluted. The BLM and 2A people started chanting and marching on us. We got into pushing and a few blows, and very close to a firefight. (And yeah i thought about ‘heroing’ it but it would have been stupid). A bunch of our guys went to the front and started hugging the 2A people. It worked. Everyone calmed down. I paused then kept on going with my speech. I finished it. There were a lot of 2A people to my left. I assume most people think there were a lot of BLM but it was just two young guys and a lot of 2A people trying to protect their image as race-neutral. So It’s their event we’re riding on. It’s their microphone. Our people were all happy, everything was fine. The 2A guys come up and ask if I”ll talk to the BLM guys. Since we just made peace, I’m not gonna screw that up. The BLM come up and ask if we can talk. Tell me that they wan’t to improve their image since the national thing is not what they represent. I don’t know but I just want to de-escalate and keep everyone happy. I talk locker room nonsense with them a bit about how our differences are rational and due to class sizes, I make the joke about dicks vs agency and everything is calm. I’m doing my ‘be reasonable’ thing. Keep the peace. They say they want to address the crowd. I don’t remember what I was thinking, but at the time I just wanted to prevent another cville, and I didn’t think it was my choice to deny it, and I gave it to them and we all supported them in order to deescalate. They went waaaaay overboard with the chanting but we thought it was a small price to pay. We were not thinking about BLM at all but the 2A folk that we didn’t want to alienate and agitate. In retrospect I should have been smarter but maybe because of the heat and confusion, I didn’t have my wits about me. I shouldn’t have given them the mic, instead just given it to the 2A folk. Same thing would have happened, but It wouldn’t have looked like I was sanctioning it. At that point everyone was happy. We avoided a clash. No cops. No Jail. No legal fees. No bad press even. Just a successful launch and a little exciting drama. We thought we’d had a successful event. We all signed the declaration. I’m pretty heat intolerant because of my health, and I was getting nauseous and started passing out so we went to a restaurant and recovered. We filled the place with our people had a blast, went home, slept an hour, got up and did a few interviews. That night we all went to the campground together. Had a party until late in the night – I talked until I lost my voice. Next morning we had a roundtable video and meeting. We were all happy. And when negative stuff started coming in I thought it was trolls being stupid and silly folk people taking them seriously. We went to breakfast and headed home late morning. I didn’t realize that a victory on the ground for us, was not interpreted as victory online. I had no idea that the troll army would turn on us for optics. I dont think we took it seriously until maybe six or eight hours later. By then the Christians, the nazbois, the catbois, and every other group that was angry we were getting attention was piling on during the usual ‘conservative crab bucket’ where ‘no one can get ahead’. So we just did our usual thing which is ‘man in the arena’ and take it. It blew over in a few days. That’s it. only problem is john got really angry and gave up on the dissident right. “For evey 1 good person on the dissident right there are 1000 trolls who ruin it for all of us – so F–k them”. So I’m missing a front man. And I need a front men, or set of frontmen, to reach normal people. Otherwise, I just have an intellectual, not a political movement. And we just are meeting and organizing the rest of our stuff as usual. So that’s all there is. Really.  

    —“… the right will never …”—

    Well, our experience is y’all have no plan, no strategy, keyboard confidence, great bravado, don’t show, can’t keep your mouths shut if you do, get your a–ses kicked if you do, think you know better about everything, and fall for every trap the left sets for you. If I asked you to show up ready to roll, would you? Of course not. Even though It takes 10k guys to start the ball rolling. You get those guys to show we win. If we can’t we lose. There is only one strategy where we control the situation, and that’s it. 10k to recruit 100k, to produce however many we need. What’s going t happen? Trump will lose the left will animate, they will have a government to defend, them and they’ll eat you all a few at a time because they’ll use the arms of the state to incrementally criminalize everything you do until you can’t do anything. Red flag is just the beginning. What do you guys do? Complain that someone who has a plan, isn’t as stupid as you are, and doesn’t take the bait, and builds political momentum needed for the numbers is ‘shit’ because of optics that matter to you but no one else. I mean – you get the leadership you deserve, and frankly, you’ve got the leadership you deserve: no one, nothing, and certain incremental defeat. So, we need to stay away from you and target only men of means that have jobs, that have assets, that have demonstrated agency because they have jobs and assets, because otherwise, you’ll destroy every possible chance anyone has for saving our people.  

  • P Is Just Science. If You Think Science Science Is White Supremacism ….

    P IS JUST SCIENCE. IF YOU THINK SCIENCE SCIENCE IS WHITE SUPREMACISM THEN YOU ARE ‘INFECTED’ WITH THE ABRAHAMIC FALSE PROMISE – NO MORE LIES.

    —“My wife finally watched some of our videos and then read some of the P website and now she’s calling me a white supremacist and won’t sleep in the same bed as me. I didn’t expect that reaction. I don’t know what to do about it. Any help you can offer?”—

    Women don’t often reason in politics easily because of their fear of ostracization, ridicule, or criticism is so much stronger than ours – it’s not fixable most of the time without age and children. My work is ‘for everyone’. It says that Europeans discovered and adapted to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and evolved thought, culture, and institutions that gave us a vast evolutionary advantage over the rest of the world – in both the ancient and modern worlds. This evolutionary advantage resulted in some behavioral changes (lower clannishness, greater neoteny, and frankly, higher sexual market value) but mostly, the benefit is the result (like the Chinese) of the reduction of our underclasses, through manorialism (regulating access to farmland), and the natural eugenics of natural selection by farming in cold weather climates. So the sciences explain European cultural supremacism as nothing more than greater adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – the most important being truth before face, and where ‘truth’ means military reporting, or what we call evidentiary truth in court. We use military reporting and courtroom speech as our normal speech in everyday life. And the effects of this ‘continuous training’ were profound – they produced our unique high trust polity and made our ability to produce commons for all rather than prestige for each, as a competitive weapon. The science also explains why it is very difficult for all but middle and upper-middle peoples from other civilizations to adapt to compete in our civilization Every people can adopt western judicial, social, political, and ‘truthful speech’ technology just as they have our scientific, technical, and financial technologies. And everyone can adopt our ‘soft eugenics’ by requiring self-sufficiency before reproduction (and punishment for reproduction without self-sufficiency). Yes, we may have to allow people to separate into communities now that we have BROKEN physical natural and evolutionary laws. We broke those laws because of the late 19th and 20th-century pseudoscientific counter-revolution against those laws, with the Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminists, and Political Correctness (lying by denying) lies that those laws can be avoided. We broke those laws in the past century just like we did in the supernatural counter-revolution against those laws in ancient world by the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim counter-revolution. In the ancient world, they blamed the Romans (meaning Europeans) for adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – and they invented the Abrahamic religions to rebel against and destroy the great civilizations of the ancient world – and we had the dark ages. And in the 19th and 20th and now 21st centuries they blame Europeans for the discovery and adaptation to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws and invented economic and social pseudoscience, to destroy western civilization once again – and create another dark age. A dark age that is already in its first stages. And it is this revolution in evolution, and the counter-revolution against evolution, that is the great battle of human history: once indo-Europeans discovered we could transcend our physical and cognitive limitations by adapting to physical, natural, and evolutionary law, that meant evolution was accelerated – and that some peoples would be left behind. So instead of being left behind by evolution, they undermined the means by which evolution was created: the great civilizations that discovered adapted to, and applied physical natural and evolutionary laws. Or in simple terms, the Abrahamic Peoples appeal to women’s nature, and the underclass’s stresses by blaming european people for the laws of nature and nature’s god – thus themselves claiming we are in fact superior. When it is, at least by the evidence, our willingness to adapt to the laws of nature and nature’s god that allows us to produced outcomes superior to that of the rest of the world combined, in but a few hundred years in the ancient and modern worlds. The Abrahamic Peoples, and willing Christian accomplices, used our open democracy, the vulnerability of women’s emotions, our flood of pre-war, war-era, and postwar immigrants, European guilt over the nazi positive (aggressive) eugenics program, the plight of the black community, and the mass media, to undermine our demand for integration into natural soft eugenics by the use of markets in everything, the nuclear family, delayed reproduction, our rule of law, limiting our public behavior to manners of ‘church and court’, our limit of public speech to empirical testimony, our truth before face in speech to the public in matters public, and the Christian religion that European protestants transformed into a germanic folk religion of ‘status’ (salvation) by hard work, piety, and social discipline that persisted our integration. The Abrahamic peoples this time in pseudoscientific (marxism, socialism, Freudianism, boazianism, pseudomathematics), and lying by sophistry and denial (postmodernism, feminism, and human nature denialism) to destroy western civilization from within as they did every other civilization of the ancient world. They did it by selling the false promise (lies) of endless growth and therefore the end of scarcity (heaven on earth), the nature of man (fallen angel), the malleability of man (blank slate) – all cognitive biases of mothers so that they continue to support their children no matter their quality and capability. And the cognitive bias of those who confuse willingness to engage in moral productive behavior is the same as the ability to compete for survival in moral productive behavior. They sold these false promises as oppression by European peoples, rather than the European peoples’ discovery of the means of transcending our animal limits and gaining power over ourselves and nature. And they profited in politics from selling these lies from selling the false promise socialism – an invitation to suicide; from selling the myth of oppression rather than the cost of integration; from selling ‘courses in pseudoscience’ to vast numbers of women, to be indoctrinated into their pseudoscientific and sophomoric new religion of oppression; from using the academic proceeds to produce pseudo-scientific propaganda, and take over the university system; to train young teachers from the bottom 1/6 of their high school classes his pseudoscience, with no life experience, and no sufficient education to reinforce it; by immigrating vast numbers of underclasses and those hostile to advanced civilization so that they could obtain political power to destroy our civilization; by financial profiteering selling interest on housing credit and consumption, in addition to 100k educations, so that it was no longer possible to reproduce; To selling the myth that people suffer in life rather than the continuous evolution of people under our civilization out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, and disease. To creating news and entertainment that justifies the oppression myth; To take over news networks and sell propaganda all day long; To using every lie possible to destroy our civilization from within. Since anyone of at least middle-class ability, can adopt and adapt to European civilization’s discovery, adaptation to, and application of physical natural and evolutionary laws, the present political problem is integration not race, and class – not race. The difference between the races is largely in the size of the classes. And nothing can fix it except birth control at the bottom. The law of evolution is very simple: The lower classes must continually shrink in relation to the degree of energy transformation (productivity). Population increases only benefit banks and the state at the expense of the middle. There are 100M too many Americans already, given the economy of this new century. The people who hate us hate us because THEY are white supremacists and we are not. We are merely scientists trying to solve the problem of the age with political and economic solutions that allow us to help one another in markets without hating each other in politics, and without causing another dark age, as the underclasses led by women’s emotions, destroy our civilization like they have the Romans, Byzantines, Persians, Egyptians, North Africans, and northwest Indians. Those civilizations are dead. And they were made dead by the same means: shouting down the truth, destroying monuments, and undermining traditions. Our proposal is ‘love everyone with the truth’ because you’re just generating hate with convenient lies. Many small homogenous communities with low political power distance allow the largest number of people ‘at the top’ and the smallest number ‘at the bottom’ creating the only equality that is possible: among those with similar kinship interests. And if some people want to try large urban heterogeneous polities and pay the (very high) costs and consequences of them then that’s fine – but they many not drag us into the same destruction that they have every other people that the Abrahamic system of lying and undermining has touched. It is the human equivalent of civilizational cancer. I’m gonna die on the hills of 2) ‘We are in this for mankind: end the globalist project to produce another dark age and destroy our identity, and maintain it by inter-state continuous evolution by competition”, “European civilization is the most advanced in EVERY technology – especially social”. And yes, Europeans – or at least many of us, need to separate and preserve our genetic, normative, traditional, cultural, and institutional advantages until others can ‘catch up’ without dragging us down into another dark age. Because that’s the science. No more lies. Even to our loving coddle wives, the fears of other women, anxiety teenage girls, and those boys-not-yet-men among us that can not tolerate the truth: we must take responsibility for ourselves, our polity, and mankind if we wish to pass through the second great filter: eugenics.

  • P Is Just Science. If You Think Science Science Is White Supremacism ….

    P IS JUST SCIENCE. IF YOU THINK SCIENCE SCIENCE IS WHITE SUPREMACISM THEN YOU ARE ‘INFECTED’ WITH THE ABRAHAMIC FALSE PROMISE – NO MORE LIES.

    —“My wife finally watched some of our videos and then read some of the P website and now she’s calling me a white supremacist and won’t sleep in the same bed as me. I didn’t expect that reaction. I don’t know what to do about it. Any help you can offer?”—

    Women don’t often reason in politics easily because of their fear of ostracization, ridicule, or criticism is so much stronger than ours – it’s not fixable most of the time without age and children. My work is ‘for everyone’. It says that Europeans discovered and adapted to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and evolved thought, culture, and institutions that gave us a vast evolutionary advantage over the rest of the world – in both the ancient and modern worlds. This evolutionary advantage resulted in some behavioral changes (lower clannishness, greater neoteny, and frankly, higher sexual market value) but mostly, the benefit is the result (like the Chinese) of the reduction of our underclasses, through manorialism (regulating access to farmland), and the natural eugenics of natural selection by farming in cold weather climates. So the sciences explain European cultural supremacism as nothing more than greater adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – the most important being truth before face, and where ‘truth’ means military reporting, or what we call evidentiary truth in court. We use military reporting and courtroom speech as our normal speech in everyday life. And the effects of this ‘continuous training’ were profound – they produced our unique high trust polity and made our ability to produce commons for all rather than prestige for each, as a competitive weapon. The science also explains why it is very difficult for all but middle and upper-middle peoples from other civilizations to adapt to compete in our civilization Every people can adopt western judicial, social, political, and ‘truthful speech’ technology just as they have our scientific, technical, and financial technologies. And everyone can adopt our ‘soft eugenics’ by requiring self-sufficiency before reproduction (and punishment for reproduction without self-sufficiency). Yes, we may have to allow people to separate into communities now that we have BROKEN physical natural and evolutionary laws. We broke those laws because of the late 19th and 20th-century pseudoscientific counter-revolution against those laws, with the Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminists, and Political Correctness (lying by denying) lies that those laws can be avoided. We broke those laws in the past century just like we did in the supernatural counter-revolution against those laws in ancient world by the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim counter-revolution. In the ancient world, they blamed the Romans (meaning Europeans) for adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – and they invented the Abrahamic religions to rebel against and destroy the great civilizations of the ancient world – and we had the dark ages. And in the 19th and 20th and now 21st centuries they blame Europeans for the discovery and adaptation to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws and invented economic and social pseudoscience, to destroy western civilization once again – and create another dark age. A dark age that is already in its first stages. And it is this revolution in evolution, and the counter-revolution against evolution, that is the great battle of human history: once indo-Europeans discovered we could transcend our physical and cognitive limitations by adapting to physical, natural, and evolutionary law, that meant evolution was accelerated – and that some peoples would be left behind. So instead of being left behind by evolution, they undermined the means by which evolution was created: the great civilizations that discovered adapted to, and applied physical natural and evolutionary laws. Or in simple terms, the Abrahamic Peoples appeal to women’s nature, and the underclass’s stresses by blaming european people for the laws of nature and nature’s god – thus themselves claiming we are in fact superior. When it is, at least by the evidence, our willingness to adapt to the laws of nature and nature’s god that allows us to produced outcomes superior to that of the rest of the world combined, in but a few hundred years in the ancient and modern worlds. The Abrahamic Peoples, and willing Christian accomplices, used our open democracy, the vulnerability of women’s emotions, our flood of pre-war, war-era, and postwar immigrants, European guilt over the nazi positive (aggressive) eugenics program, the plight of the black community, and the mass media, to undermine our demand for integration into natural soft eugenics by the use of markets in everything, the nuclear family, delayed reproduction, our rule of law, limiting our public behavior to manners of ‘church and court’, our limit of public speech to empirical testimony, our truth before face in speech to the public in matters public, and the Christian religion that European protestants transformed into a germanic folk religion of ‘status’ (salvation) by hard work, piety, and social discipline that persisted our integration. The Abrahamic peoples this time in pseudoscientific (marxism, socialism, Freudianism, boazianism, pseudomathematics), and lying by sophistry and denial (postmodernism, feminism, and human nature denialism) to destroy western civilization from within as they did every other civilization of the ancient world. They did it by selling the false promise (lies) of endless growth and therefore the end of scarcity (heaven on earth), the nature of man (fallen angel), the malleability of man (blank slate) – all cognitive biases of mothers so that they continue to support their children no matter their quality and capability. And the cognitive bias of those who confuse willingness to engage in moral productive behavior is the same as the ability to compete for survival in moral productive behavior. They sold these false promises as oppression by European peoples, rather than the European peoples’ discovery of the means of transcending our animal limits and gaining power over ourselves and nature. And they profited in politics from selling these lies from selling the false promise socialism – an invitation to suicide; from selling the myth of oppression rather than the cost of integration; from selling ‘courses in pseudoscience’ to vast numbers of women, to be indoctrinated into their pseudoscientific and sophomoric new religion of oppression; from using the academic proceeds to produce pseudo-scientific propaganda, and take over the university system; to train young teachers from the bottom 1/6 of their high school classes his pseudoscience, with no life experience, and no sufficient education to reinforce it; by immigrating vast numbers of underclasses and those hostile to advanced civilization so that they could obtain political power to destroy our civilization; by financial profiteering selling interest on housing credit and consumption, in addition to 100k educations, so that it was no longer possible to reproduce; To selling the myth that people suffer in life rather than the continuous evolution of people under our civilization out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, and disease. To creating news and entertainment that justifies the oppression myth; To take over news networks and sell propaganda all day long; To using every lie possible to destroy our civilization from within. Since anyone of at least middle-class ability, can adopt and adapt to European civilization’s discovery, adaptation to, and application of physical natural and evolutionary laws, the present political problem is integration not race, and class – not race. The difference between the races is largely in the size of the classes. And nothing can fix it except birth control at the bottom. The law of evolution is very simple: The lower classes must continually shrink in relation to the degree of energy transformation (productivity). Population increases only benefit banks and the state at the expense of the middle. There are 100M too many Americans already, given the economy of this new century. The people who hate us hate us because THEY are white supremacists and we are not. We are merely scientists trying to solve the problem of the age with political and economic solutions that allow us to help one another in markets without hating each other in politics, and without causing another dark age, as the underclasses led by women’s emotions, destroy our civilization like they have the Romans, Byzantines, Persians, Egyptians, North Africans, and northwest Indians. Those civilizations are dead. And they were made dead by the same means: shouting down the truth, destroying monuments, and undermining traditions. Our proposal is ‘love everyone with the truth’ because you’re just generating hate with convenient lies. Many small homogenous communities with low political power distance allow the largest number of people ‘at the top’ and the smallest number ‘at the bottom’ creating the only equality that is possible: among those with similar kinship interests. And if some people want to try large urban heterogeneous polities and pay the (very high) costs and consequences of them then that’s fine – but they many not drag us into the same destruction that they have every other people that the Abrahamic system of lying and undermining has touched. It is the human equivalent of civilizational cancer. I’m gonna die on the hills of 2) ‘We are in this for mankind: end the globalist project to produce another dark age and destroy our identity, and maintain it by inter-state continuous evolution by competition”, “European civilization is the most advanced in EVERY technology – especially social”. And yes, Europeans – or at least many of us, need to separate and preserve our genetic, normative, traditional, cultural, and institutional advantages until others can ‘catch up’ without dragging us down into another dark age. Because that’s the science. No more lies. Even to our loving coddle wives, the fears of other women, anxiety teenage girls, and those boys-not-yet-men among us that can not tolerate the truth: we must take responsibility for ourselves, our polity, and mankind if we wish to pass through the second great filter: eugenics.

  • P IS JUST SCIENCE. IF YOU THINK SCIENCE IS WHITE SUPREMACISM THEN YOU ARE ‘INFEC

    P IS JUST SCIENCE. IF YOU THINK SCIENCE IS WHITE SUPREMACISM THEN YOU ARE ‘INFECTED’ WITH THE ABRAHAMIC FALSE PROMISE – NO MORE LIES.

    (updated)

    —“My wife finally watched some of our videos and then read some of the P website and now she’s calling me a white supremacist and won’t sleep in the same bed as me. I didn’t expect that reaction. I don’t know what to do about it. Any help you can offer?”—

    Women don’t often reason in politics easily because of their fear of ostracization, ridicule, or criticism is so much stronger than ours – it’s not fixable most of the time without age and children.

    My work is ‘for everyone’. It says that Europeans discovered and adapted to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and evolved thought, culture, and institutions that gave us a vast evolutionary advantage over the rest of the world – in both the ancient and modern worlds.

    This evolutionary advantage resulted in some behavioral changes (lower clannishness, greater neoteny, and frankly, higher sexual market value) but mostly, the benefit is the result (like the Chinese) of the reduction of our underclasses, through manorialism (regulating access to farmland), and the natural eugenics of natural selection by farming in cold weather climates.

    So the sciences explain European cultural supremacism as nothing more than greater adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – the most important being truth before face, and where ‘truth’ means military reporting, or what we call evidentiary truth in court. We use military reporting and courtroom speech as our normal speech in everyday life. And the effects of this ‘continuous training’ were profound – they produced our unique high trust polity and made our ability to produce commons for all rather than prestige for each, as a competitive weapon.

    The science also explains why it is very difficult for all but middle and upper-middle peoples from other civilizations to adapt to compete in our civilization

    Every people can adopt western judicial, social, political, and ‘truthful speech’ technology just as they have our scientific, technical, and financial technologies. And everyone can adopt our ‘soft eugenics’ by requiring self-sufficiency before reproduction (and punishment for reproduction without self-sufficiency).

    Yes, we may have to allow people to separate into communities now that we have BROKEN physical natural and evolutionary laws.

    We broke those laws because of the late 19th and 20th-century pseudoscientific counter-revolution

    against those laws, with the Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminists, and Political Correctness (lying by denying) lies that those laws can be avoided.

    We broke those laws in the past century just like we did in the supernatural counter-revolution against those laws in ancient world by the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim counter-revolution.

    In the ancient world, they blamed the Romans (meaning Europeans) for adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – and they invented the Abrahamic religions to rebel against and destroy the great civilizations of the ancient world – and we had the dark ages.

    And in the 19th and 20th and now 21st centuries they blame Europeans for the discovery and adaptation to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws and invented economic and social pseudoscience, to destroy western civilization once again – and create another dark age. A dark age that is already in its first stages.

    And it is this revolution in evolution, and the counter-revolution against evolution, that is the great battle of human history: once indo-Europeans discovered we could transcend our physical and cognitive limitations by adapting to physical, natural, and evolutionary law, that meant evolution was accelerated – and that some peoples would be left behind. So instead of being left behind by evolution, they undermined the means by which evolution was created: the great civilizations that discovered adapted to, and applied physical natural and evolutionary laws.

    Or in simple terms, the Abrahamic Peoples appeal to women’s nature, and the underclass’s stresses by blaming european people for the laws of nature and nature’s god – thus themselves claiming we are in fact superior. When it is, at least by the evidence, our willingness to adapt to the laws of nature and nature’s god that allows us to produced outcomes superior to that of the rest of the world combined, in but a few hundred years in the ancient and modern worlds.

    The Abrahamic Peoples, and willing Christian accomplices, used our open democracy, the vulnerability of women’s emotions, our flood of pre-war, war-era, and postwar immigrants, European guilt over the nazi positive (aggressive) eugenics program, the plight of the black community, and the mass media, to undermine our demand for integration into natural soft eugenics by the use of markets in everything, the nuclear family, delayed reproduction, our rule of law, limiting our public behavior to manners of ‘church and court’, our limit of public speech to empirical testimony, our truth before face in speech to the public in matters public, and the Christian religion that European protestants transformed into a germanic folk religion of ‘status’ (salvation) by hard work, piety, and social discipline that persisted our integration.

    The Abrahamic peoples this time in pseudoscientific (marxism, socialism, Freudianism, boazianism, pseudomathematics), and lying by sophistry and denial (postmodernism, feminism, and human nature denialism) to destroy western civilization from within as they did every other civilization of the ancient world.

    They did it by selling the false promise (lies) of endless growth and therefore the end of scarcity (heaven on earth), the nature of man (fallen angel), the malleability of man (blank slate) – all cognitive biases of mothers so that they continue to support their children no matter their quality and capability. And the cognitive bias of those who confuse willingness to engage in moral productive behavior is the same as the ability to compete for survival in moral productive behavior. They sold these false promises as oppression by European peoples, rather than the European peoples’ discovery of the means of transcending our animal limits and gaining power over ourselves and nature.

    And they profited in politics from selling these lies from selling interest to enc

    The present political problem is integration – not race, and class – not race. The lower classes must continually shrink in relation to the degree of energy transformation (productivity).

    The people who hate us hate us because THEY are white supremacists and we are not. We are merely scientists trying to solve the problem of the age with political and economic solutions that allow us to help one another in markets without hating each other in politics, and without causing another dark age, as the underclasses led by women’s emotions, destroy our civilization like they have the Romans, Byzantines, Persians, Egyptians, North Africans, and northwest Indians. Those civilizations are dead. And they were made dead by the same means: shouting down the truth, destroying monuments, and undermining traditions.

    Our proposal is ‘love everyone with the truth’ because you’re just generating hate with convenient lies. Many small homogenous communities with low political power distance allow the largest number of people ‘at the top’ and the smallest number ‘at the bottom’ creating the only equality that is possible: among those with similar kinship interests.

    And if some people want to try large urban heterogeneous polities and pay the (very high) costs and consequences of them then that’s fine – but they many not drag us into the same destruction that they have every other people that the Abrahamic system of lying and undermining has touched. It is the human equivalent of civilizational cancer.

    I’m gonna die on the hills of 2) ‘We are in this for mankind: end the globalist project to produce another dark age and destroy our identity, and maintain it by inter-state continuous evolution by competition”, “European civilization is the most advanced in EVERY technology – especially social”. And yes, Europeans – or at least many of us, need to separate and preserve our genetic, normative, traditional, cultural, and institutional advantages until others can ‘catch up’ without dragging us down into another dark age.

    Because that’s the science.

    No more lies. Even to our loving coddle wives, the fears of other women, anxiety teenage girls, and those boys-not-yet-men among us that can not tolerate the truth: we must take responsibility for ourselves, our polity, and mankind if we wish to pass through the second great filter: eugenics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 10:55:00 UTC

  • IT’S AN ACCUSATION –“You can’t handle the truth!”– That’s why truth is enough

    IT’S AN ACCUSATION

    –“You can’t handle the truth!”–

    That’s why truth is enough – if you can handle the truth you are transcendent – fully human. If you can’t handle the truth then you are not transcendent – you are just a semi-domesticated animal. If you can’t handle the truth you are Spiritually, Emotionally, and Mentally “Unfit”. Unfit for what? Unfit for reproductive survival. You are the enemy of nature and nature’s god’s design.

    Why do we need the truth? Why do we avoid it? Why do we deny it?

    We need truth to resolve our conflicts. We need truth to prevent deceits. We need truth to discover the unknown. We avoid our understanding of the universe because we can’t resist it. We deny the truth of the universe because we can’t bear it.

    And when we do avoid, resist, deny and fail to bear the truth, we impose costs on others – especially others who discover, adapt to, and apply the truth: the physical nature and evolutionary laws of the universe.

    The physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of nature and nature’s god are clear: they are not for man’s benefit. They are all but hostile to man. Man is merely a tool that nature and nature’s god uses to increase its potential to defeat entropy in our race to pass through the great filters, and defeat the heat death of the universe. And you and those like you that can’t handle the truth are one of the Great Filters mankind must overcome.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 10:20:00 UTC

  • (Is it false?) lol

    (Is it false?) lol

    Reply addressees: @CHSommers

  • (Is it false?) lol

    (Is it false?) lol


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 00:18:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283918975731204097

    Reply addressees: @CHSommers

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283915932167999489

  • Truth Prevails. This is no different from when the libertarians came after me. J

    Truth Prevails. This is no different from when the libertarians came after me. Just more numbers. Lots of normies looking for john mark explanatory content. Lots of patriots looking for it. Lots of opportunities to play that.

    I’m pondering another event in New England, rather soon.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-16 17:41:00 UTC