We’re debating right here. In public. In writing. Free of your little games. You can walk away if you want. But the evidence is what it is. You are afraid of the central argument, and that such an argument divorces it from the loading and framing you’re trying to attach.
Fear.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Theme: Truth
-
We’re debating right here. In public. In writing. Free of your little games. You
-
I don’t know about that. It’s a law (truth, decidable), It’s not a philosophy (s
I don’t know about that. It’s a law (truth, decidable), It’s not a philosophy (strategy, preference). Christianity is a philosophy (strategy) and it optimally extends natural law (defeats the prisoner’s dilemma). So natural law (negative) + christianity (positive) get there.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 23:37:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285720685260791810
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285717095293083655
-
I don’t know about that. It’s a law (truth, decidable), It’s not a philosophy (s
I don’t know about that. It’s a law (truth, decidable), It’s not a philosophy (strategy, preference). Christianity is a philosophy (strategy) and it optimally extends natural law (defeats the prisoner’s dilemma). So natural law (negative) + christianity (positive) get there.
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 -
No sense in repeating myself. You have to produce something worth debating. And
No sense in repeating myself. You have to produce something worth debating. And I have to be convinced of your intellectual honesty. So far you don’t know what my work advocates, and you don’t understand why communism, socialism, bolshevism were death marches. So in public only. https://t.co/NSkoFtaYgp
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 21:39:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285690897926160389
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285667060446633988
-
No sense in repeating myself. You have to produce something worth debating. And
No sense in repeating myself. You have to produce something worth debating. And I have to be convinced of your intellectual honesty. So far you don’t know what my work advocates, and you don’t understand why communism, socialism, bolshevism were death marches. So in public only. https://t.co/NSkoFtaYgp
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
Why Can’t Right Win? Vanity: Belief in supernatural magic men is impossible for
Why Can’t Right Win? Vanity: Belief in supernatural magic men is impossible for intelligent people. Tolerance for the hard truth is impossible for the meek, dim, and weak. Courage for Civnats. Discipline for the angry impulsive NS. Uncertainty for timid but capable WN/Patriots.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 21:16:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285685185493729283
Reply addressees: @CONTENTINOPLE_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285668984352919552
-
Why Can’t Right Win? Vanity: Belief in supernatural magic men is impossible for
Why Can’t Right Win? Vanity: Belief in supernatural magic men is impossible for intelligent people. Tolerance for the hard truth is impossible for the meek, dim, and weak. Courage for Civnats. Discipline for the angry impulsive NS. Uncertainty for timid but capable WN/Patriots.
Reply addressees: @CONTENTINOPLE_ -
These re just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on t
These re just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on the level of sophistication of your people. Russians are smart educatied but trust noone.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
These re just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on t
These re just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on the level of sophistication of your people. Russians are smart educatied but trust noone.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 19:53:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285664103076421634
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285660863874109441
-
I don’t see that you have a debate other than that you are following the Traditi
I don’t see that you have a debate other than that you are following the Tradition RU habit of historical revisionism and data-cherrypicking in order to avoid the central thesis, of force labor discounts at cost of corruption, vs incentive labor costs in favor of productivity.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4