He didn’t discover at the end, the presumed from the beginning. Why and how did he get there?
The Intuition of the state of the world.
The intuitive judgment of it.
The intuition of who is to blame for it
The Intuition about how to change it
The Means of arguing for it.
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3
Theme: Truth
-
He didn’t discover at the end, the presumed from the beginning. Why and how did
-
He didn’t discover at the end, the presumed from the beginning. Why and how did
He didn’t discover at the end, the presumed from the beginning. Why and how did he get there?
The Intuition of the state of the world.
The intuitive judgment of it.
The intuition of who is to blame for it
The Intuition about how to change it
The Means of arguing for it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-30 14:26:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288843513011077121
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288843227223793666
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3 Marx’s work denies the nature of man as he is, and presumes the nature of man’s instincts as female instincts.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1288843227223793666
-
What truths of physical natural and evolutionary law, do christianity, judaism,
What truths of physical natural and evolutionary law, do christianity, judaism, and islam seek to undermine by false promise of something that can’t be warranted?
(“The Grammars”, “Testimony”(truth), “Reciprocity” (ethics), and “Algorithmic Construction of Law” are hard work.) https://t.co/c8Jb1VGqpg
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3
-
What truths of physical natural and evolutionary law, do christianity, judaism,
What truths of physical natural and evolutionary law, do christianity, judaism, and islam seek to undermine by false promise of something that can’t be warranted?
(“The Grammars”, “Testimony”(truth), “Reciprocity” (ethics), and “Algorithmic Construction of Law” are hard work.) https://t.co/c8Jb1VGqpg
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-30 01:18:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288645193512747010
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288641495029780480
-
You know how you can tell the difference between scientific, philosophical, and
You know how you can tell the difference between scientific, philosophical, and theological arguments? Or between Aristotelian, Confucian, platonic, and Abrahamic?
The logic in Abrahamic supernatural, pseudoscientific, sophistry is consistent, as is logic in sciences consistent.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3 -
You know how you can tell the difference between scientific, philosophical, and
You know how you can tell the difference between scientific, philosophical, and theological arguments? Or between Aristotelian, Confucian, platonic, and Abrahamic?
The logic in Abrahamic supernatural, pseudoscientific, sophistry is consistent, as is logic in sciences consistent.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-30 01:13:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288643850525904898
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288641495029780480
-
The logic is the same because logic merely refers to constant relations (consist
The logic is the same because logic merely refers to constant relations (consistency).
Consistency between WHAT is always the question. 😉
Reply addressees: @PoshMePretty -
The logic is the same because logic merely refers to constant relations (consist
The logic is the same because logic merely refers to constant relations (consistency).
Consistency between WHAT is always the question. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 23:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288620516903968769
Reply addressees: @PoshMePretty
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288620353514811392
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@PoshMePretty Well, I think the question is the premises. 😉
Limiting Constant Relations To:
1. Actions: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Materialism (Science)
2. Speech: Idealism, Verbalism, Dualism (Philosophy)
3. Emotions, Imagination, Supernaturalism, Spiritualism: (Theology)Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1288620353514811392
-
Explain programming to me simply. 😉 You know what the difference is? You don’t
Explain programming to me simply. 😉
You know what the difference is?
You don’t have to falsify your priors to learn programming.
You do have to falsify your priors to learn P.
Just as people thought ‘why doesn’t it understand what I mean’, P forces you to accept you don’t know.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 22:19:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288599998641430536
Reply addressees: @WrongThink_er @TruthQuest11 @billtalts @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288578780215287809
-
Explain programming to me simply. 😉 You know what the difference is? You don’t
Explain programming to me simply. 😉
You know what the difference is?
You don’t have to falsify your priors to learn programming.
You do have to falsify your priors to learn P.
Just as people thought ‘why doesn’t it understand what I mean’, P forces you to accept you don’t know.
Reply addressees: @WrongThink_er @TruthQuest11 @billtalts @JulieBorowski