Performative (Existential) Truth https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/performative-existential-truth/
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 15:03:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307334558916972549
Performative (Existential) Truth https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/performative-existential-truth/
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 15:03:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307334558916972549
Performative Truth rather than the pretense of it, requires consistency of properties (identity) of reference, internal consistency (logical consistency), consistency of operational possibility (sequences in time), consistency of observed consequences (empiricism), rational choice by rational incentives, reciprocity (bi-directional rational choice), coherence (consistency with realism, naturalism, and operationalism), completeness by stated limits, and full accounting within them, are the minimum criteria for due diligence against falsehood by ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, under liability for having performed that due diligence.
This is the analytic and complete inventory of the criteria we use in the judgment of the truth today – and have for centuries. It’s just that the scientific community is less demanding than the court, the philosophical community less so than the scientific, and the informal community lacking constraint at all. And the academic, public intellectual, commercial, economic, financial, and political communities abuse with reckless abandon. And with religions – whether supernatural or pseudoscientific (marxism – feminism et al) or sophistry (postmodernism et all) – specializing in lying.
Performative Truth rather than the pretense of it, requires consistency of properties (identity) of reference, internal consistency (logical consistency), consistency of operational possibility (sequences in time), consistency of observed consequences (empiricism), rational choice by rational incentives, reciprocity (bi-directional rational choice), coherence (consistency with realism, naturalism, and operationalism), completeness by stated limits, and full accounting within them, are the minimum criteria for due diligence against falsehood by ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, under liability for having performed that due diligence.
This is the analytic and complete inventory of the criteria we use in the judgment of the truth today – and have for centuries. It’s just that the scientific community is less demanding than the court, the philosophical community less so than the scientific, and the informal community lacking constraint at all. And the academic, public intellectual, commercial, economic, financial, and political communities abuse with reckless abandon. And with religions – whether supernatural or pseudoscientific (marxism – feminism et al) or sophistry (postmodernism et all) – specializing in lying.
Metaphysics = Paradigm. Paradigms may be consistent or not, coherent or not, actionable or not, and correspondent or not. Only one is all of them. The rest are fictionalisms. East Asian vs Western is the canon example: verb vs noun
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Metaphysics = Paradigm. Paradigms may be consistent or not, coherent or not, actionable or not, and correspondent or not. Only one is all of them. The rest are fictionalisms. East Asian vs Western is the canon example: verb vs noun
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 03:38:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307162113371254786
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307139794053533698
Just as you are unfit for economics, politics and war because you are unable to put truth before face regardless of cost.
Interestingly, when women are married and carrying a full cognitive load of offspring (minimum of four to five) they develop truth before face.
Reply addressees: @DoveCalderwood @PittPensPats
Just as you are unfit for economics, politics and war because you are unable to put truth before face regardless of cost.
Interestingly, when women are married and carrying a full cognitive load of offspring (minimum of four to five) they develop truth before face.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 00:08:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307109374729560066
Reply addressees: @DoveCalderwood @PittPensPats
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307107071003963392
Think abut that a bit. The profound importance of truth before face, regardless of cost. That ONLY eurpeans developed it, rule of law, reason, science, and yes, democracy (merit markets in everything), and that Ginsberg was a non-european underming 5000 years of that foundation.
Reply addressees: @DoveCalderwood @PittPensPats
Think abut that a bit. The profound importance of truth before face, regardless of cost. That ONLY eurpeans developed it, rule of law, reason, science, and yes, democracy (merit markets in everything), and that Ginsberg was a non-european underming 5000 years of that foundation.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 00:07:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307109000488669184
Reply addressees: @DoveCalderwood @PittPensPats
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307107071003963392
Nope. Truth before face, regardless of cost, is the most important of ancestral european traditions, and the reason europeans developed rule of law, reason, science, technology, and all our wonders. (Women’s inability to do so is also the reason that men kept them from politics.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 00:05:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307108604047175680
Reply addressees: @DoveCalderwood @PittPensPats
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307107071003963392