Finished a high-truth-content (painfully true) podcast with Alberto Zambrano (Venezuela) this morning.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-01 15:53:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333801385326833671
Theme: Truth
-
I don’t understand, because at least in the context, the author is correct. If y
I don’t understand, because at least in the context, the author is correct. If you can’t operationalize an argument you don’t understand it, and you can’t claim it’s true. You can only use it for further investigation until you can operationalize it or discover it can’t be.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-01 15:15:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333791804676685828
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333786738574061568
-
Ben: Correct framing: European men alone practice adversarial competition includ
Ben: Correct framing: European men alone practice adversarial competition including truth before face and testimonial truth (military reporting, court testimony, binding oath, confession) that we call empiricism. Female’s don’t. In every field they degrade competitive advantage.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-01 14:57:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333787251604553736
Reply addressees: @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333123014905442306
-
It’s true though
It’s true though. https://twitter.com/EPoe187/status/1333123014108598273
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-01 03:58:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333621406207266822
-
I deal in data( measurements). show me data that doesn’t show the outliers in th
I deal in data( measurements). show me data that doesn’t show the outliers in the swing states are impossible.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-01 01:59:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333591632537657344
Reply addressees: @Thischick85 @Jade22805149 @WestSideHere @Rasmussen_Poll @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333587078098034688
-
RT @ThruTheHayes: THE TRUTH IS INTOLERANT
RT @ThruTheHayes: THE TRUTH IS INTOLERANT https://t.co/88X0pbnA8L
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-30 22:04:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333532479433695233
-
Hmm… Source of truth is an ‘ambiguous’ statement. Instead, for any given life
Hmm… Source of truth is an ‘ambiguous’ statement. Instead, for any given life form, there is one most parsimonious vocabulary and logic for constructing one most parsimonious paradigm that is most universal consistent correspondent and coherent with the universe.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-30 21:26:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333522864226652160
Reply addressees: @Deinellpilled @Daily_Benoist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333460931993604097
-
Karl, when did you go from being the only competent and intellectually honest li
Karl, when did you go from being the only competent and intellectually honest liberal I could find in the entire country, openly arguing for the truth of costs and the underling choice of trade off, to playing the same GSRRM and game, argument as Krugman and Delong? Frustrating
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-30 18:40:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333480947094867970
Reply addressees: @karlbykarlsmith @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333478986467450880
-
Epistemology and Markets. We can easily know what is bad (irreciprocal, decapita
Epistemology and Markets. We can easily know what is bad (irreciprocal, decapitalizing). We cannot easily know what is good from the field of available potential goods. https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1333128783025598470
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-29 19:34:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333132160161734656
https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1333128783025598470
-
Ok. Now think about that for a minute. Measurements < Procedures < Testimony < O
Ok. Now think about that for a minute.
Measurements < Procedures < Testimony < Ordinary Speech > Fictions > Fictionalisms > Deceits > Denials
There are only three fictionalisms:
Physical: Magic – Pseudoscience
Verbal: Sophistry-Idealism
Imaginary: Occult – Supernaturalism
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-29 18:19:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333113278168494080
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1333111781301096448