Theme: Truth

  • I don’t hate anyone. I want to stop lying. Members of cultures are no more cogni

    I don’t hate anyone. I want to stop lying. Members of cultures are no more cognizant of their difference in strategy than are men and women – and even more incompetent at understanding one another’s. Strategies aren’t relative any more than truth is. Theirs is anti-evolutionary.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 17:12:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354115118003531776

    Reply addressees: @superkanga

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354111965711491072

  • The evidence is the opposite. If we restored resocialization in the family, and

    The evidence is the opposite. If we restored resocialization in the family, and in workplace at 12-14 it would do a far better job, and if we eliminated falsehood from academia it would do a better job for the 5% of university studies that are necessary (engineering).


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 17:38:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353759230336118785

    Reply addressees: @dachte @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353504922369740802

  • Testimonialism for short, or Formal Natural Law, or the formal logic of behavior

    Testimonialism for short, or Formal Natural Law, or the formal logic of behavioral science? I dunno.

    Libertarianism > Propertarianism(Ethics) > Testimonialism(scientific method) > Formal Natural Law > The formal logic of teh behavioral sciences?


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-24 17:25:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353393494883250176

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353369700294647819

  • We didn’t change the branding from propertarianism early enough because it had a

    We didn’t change the branding from propertarianism early enough because it had already caught on. We tried testimonialism and a number of otheres, But in the end it’s just natural law.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-23 21:11:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353088001702850562

  • The Jefferson bible is, as far as I know, the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. He

    The Jefferson bible is, as far as I know, the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. He claims no miracles, no magic, and no divinity, only that he is the son of god as all others were.

    He solved the hard problem of empires.
    And the Paulians corrupted it into proto-marxism.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-22 15:27:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352638923131002883

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352638922095005699


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    The value of Jesus’s teaching is that it made status and character available in ‘the new era of reason’ to those without military prowess, wealth, cunning, or noble family.

    And that Paul is the founder of the cult that created cult of fraud and magic in his name.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1352638922095005699

  • To say a tautology is true does not tell us it is correspondent. In order to TES

    To say a tautology is true does not tell us it is correspondent. In order to TESTIFY, we need missing information that is provided by the theory being stated. So a testifiable description is externally correspondent AND internally consistent. A tautology compares nothing. https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1352313117003440130

  • Correct. Testifying to a tautology is a circular argument

    Correct. Testifying to a tautology is a circular argument.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 17:50:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352312534297096195

    Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @BigStyle19

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352312258735566848

  • WHY THE PRESENT CONFLICT, AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT The question is, can we be

    WHY THE PRESENT CONFLICT, AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
    The question is, can we bear the cost of the truth in order to avoid the cost of civil war?

    Rollup:
    https://twitter.com/LexLegisEuropae/status/1352311658832678913

    Full Post: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2021/01/21/134247/

  • Update to Our Truth Table

    Update to Our Truth Table

    Update to Our Truth Table https://t.co/zlNlkfiYC7


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 13:24:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352245728089960450

  • Quotes of the Day

    Quotes of the Day

    TESTIMONY ON P-LAW
     
    It’s not set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference, but operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. It takes a very long time to grasp that P-law is to life sciences what physics is to physical sciences. The depth of P-Law is awe-inspiring. Because just as it’s difficult to write a proof in math, it’s equally difficult to write a proof in P-law. P-law=Math of Action.
     
    -“Here’s what helped me initially understand P law and how it mirrors Natural law: it’s in human nature to want cooperation, to want others to treat you fairly, to want to own property. Works the same in animal kingdom. Laws in Western civilization were based on these principles.”- TruthQuest
    SEX DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTION OF THE RED QUEEN –“Given randomness and uncertainty throughout Universe and Nature from sub-atomic level up to the human kingdom, P Law is the calculation of operations to mirror Natural & Universal laws by bringing order, predictability, homeostasis and ADAPTATION to an entropic human ecosystem?”– In other words, we are always in a race with the red queen. I think males intuit this constant, and females CAN’T intuit it any more than males intuit the female ‘fear’. SEX DIFFERENCES IN LOGIC: Males are more adaptive (Logic: True vs False) Reason, Competitive Advantage(Adaptation), Action(production), Political. -vs- Females are less adaptive (Logic: Approve vs Disapprove) Intuition, harmony(non-adaptation), Experience(consumption), Social. Scientific = Operational: P-Law is operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. Philosophical= Verbal: Philosophical logic is set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference. SCIENTIFIC LOGIC: THE TERNARY TRUTH TABLE V1 Center column = Truth Hierarchy
    InsufficientTruth CandidateFalse
    1IncoherentTestifiableUntestifiable(F)
    2UndecidablePossibleImpossible(F)
    3PossibleContingentInconsistent(F)
    4ContingentSufficientInsufficient(F)
    5Sufficient(T)Complete(T)Tautological(M)
    SCIENTIFIC LOGIC: THE TERNARY TRUTH TABLE V2 Center column = Truth Hierarchy
    Insufficient Truth Candidate False
    1 Incoherent Coherent Irrelevant(F)
    2 Coherent Testifiable Untestifiable(F)
    3 Undecidable Possible Impossible(F)
    4 Possible Contingent Inconsistent(F)
    5 Contingent Sufficient Insufficient(F)
    6 Sufficient(T) Complete(T) Tautological(T)
      Hypothesis Theory
    (Doolittle 2020)
    THE LOGIC OF COGNITION I write proofs from first principles. If I can’t write a proof, I can’t claim my judgments are true. If I can, then I can. This is what separates people who think they know by accident, from people who do know by discipline. Very, very, very few people work from first principles.
    Entropy measured by Math is the first principle of the constant relations of the physical sciences. Acquisition measured by operations is the first principle of the Behavioral (Natural) Sciences.
    THREE FUNDAMENTAL INSIGHTS
    Three fundamental insights from my research:
    1 – ‘They’ are far more evil than anyone expected.
    2 – Christian morality and ethics are scientifically optimum, and the Catholic Church simply failed to transition natural law from dogma.
    3 – Fascists discovered the optimum state.
    A PAINFUL TRUTH
    A painful truth: Conducting my research program in public provided more evidence that while a few exceptional thinkers pursue fundamental truths, all others only seek justification of instincts, arguments that justify them, and the power to advance them – w/o any understanding.
    THE WEST HAS ALWAYS PRACTICED SCIENCE
    The Pre-War European > Germanic > Anglo civilization was the closest to and least divergent from the law of the universe. Rule ofLaw in the West, means In Concert with And by Adaptation To the laws of the universe. The west has always practiced ‘science’. The Laws of the Universe .. The Formal, Physical, Natural(Behavior), Evolutionary Laws .. .. The Natural Law of Cooperation .. .. .. The Natural Law of Conflict Resolution(Reciprocity) .. .. .. .. The Natural Law of Tort(Property) .. .. .. .. .. The Common Law –> The US Const. LAW IS THE KING OF THE HILL (Deflationary Grammar) Logic … Math … … Algorithms … … … Recipes, Protocols … … … … Sciences … … … … … The Law (Descriptive Grammar) … … … … Narration … … … Fiction … … Fictionaisms … Deceit Fraud (Inflationary Grammar)
    CATHOLICISM
    Shifting my opinion on Catholicism a bit, in that church dogma produced what is very close to a system of natural law sufficient to unify families, clans, tribes and nations of PEASANTS to compete with the families, tribes, states of ARISTOCRACY. But the Nobility captured Church.
    ECON IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SCIENCE You know, every major prediction I’ve made that I can remember back to at least 1983, was spot on. But it doesn’t matter. Because it’s impossible to convince people to act before they can’t escape acting. Why? It’s easier.
    Gotta teach Behavioral Econ -> Micro Econ -> Political Economy. Macro is at this point, going to be irrelevant other than at the most abstract level, because the coming financial system reform, maximizing sovereign funds, is going to eliminate the noise in the system. It’s criminal. So teach behavioral econ and demographics.

    PREDICTING SIGNALS NOT NOISE There is a very great difference between predicting deterministic consequences and predicting the noise within them. If you predict changes in noise you have either inside information or you’re lucky. 😉 Read Mandlebrot’s “Misbehavior”

    SOLDIERS IN THE CAPITOL
    Kabuki theatre. If the conservatives showed with 500k to 1M people what do you think 500 soldiers are going to do? You think the military is going to open fire on citizens? You think they’ll use explosives? Artillery? It would end the government, the country, and the military.
    THE STATE FEARS THE RIGHT
    The Government is going after Right protesters because they fear them. They brought the state’s illusion of control into question. They do not go after Leftists, BLM, and Antifa because they justify the state, and because the public sector bears the fear and costs of riots.
    GLOBAL POWER SHIFTS There is no way that the current order can continue without the previous radical asymmetry of the American economy vs the rest of the world – especially between the wars and the abandonment of socialism and communism.
    They won’t act until they have to – and have political cover.

    ITS TRUTH-BEFORE-FACE –“Bit off topic question Mr Doolittle. Did you coin a term something like “putting face above truth” (I paraphrase) ?If so I think it’s similar to my term – lawyering.Trying to *appear* correct rather than actually *being* correct…happens often in debates.”– You’re looking for “Truth before Face vs Face before Truth, vs Face regardless of Truth”. ie: west, asia, islam Lawyering is a good vernacular term for “the rhetorical pretense of knowledge not demonstrated” Fraud by Suggestion not yet fraud by omission or declaration.

    PUTIN
    Putin has made only two mistakes in his entire tenure, and both are because of his lack of understanding of western trust. He didn’t take the case for NATO membership, or for the Don River valley and black sea-port to the American people – he would have won both. (See Israel)
    “The Muslim conquest of India is the bloodiest story in history”-Will Durant Yep. As bad as the Mesoamericans were – and they were bad – nothing compares to the work of Islam bloody Islam. And no. Amerindians were brutal vile primitive people who only slightly better. Q: “What stopped the Hindus fighting back effectively and what was the Islamic competitive advantage?” Mobile Raiders whose resources are directed to horse and arms can profit by plunder, looting, slaving, destroying and conquest, because they are always superior to landed defenders whose resources must instead be devoted to defensive, static, production. Q: “How did Slavic states like Novgorod survive and turn the tide against the Turkic & Mongol hordes, what did they do right compared to the Hindus?” They didn’t. They endured while mongols failed to create a state bureaucracy and formal institutions – instead focusing on extractions – and took advantage of deterministic weakness for rapid aggressive expansion. This remains the Russian strategy today: suffer, wait, sprint.
    JEFFERSON The founders were trying to escape the parasitism of both church and state, and didn’t want to repeat the same. The federation (not country) left almost everything to the States. The rush for the western expansion, war over it, created the central government they feared.
    Jefferson was supporting the rise of the meritocratic middle class, and existing the parasitic church and state. And he wanted to escape what we would call today peasants, but he called people of low character. Re: Tax Rebellions And so? The reality was that the crown was no longer paying for defense, and the federal govt had no money, and these people were evading necessary taxes. It’s not like today when we’re complaining about absurd uncontrolled spending and debt. It was a simple economic necessity. (And liberalism – middle-class rule, that escaped the parasitic burden of church and aristocracy-state, has nothing to do with today’s Left which seeks to RESTORE that parasitism by peasantry(immigrants), academy (church) and state (bureaucracy). (BTW: Conflating is lying) A WELCOME APOLOGY   Thank you. Means a lot to me. But the problem remains. Nazis and Christians did the damage to us – not the left or the mainstream. It ended our reach. So like I said the conservative crab bucket makes any organized resistance, rebellion or revolution to save ourselves impossible. –“I believe you’re 100% right, but to be devil’s advocate for a sec… Not to bust your balls or anything, but if you had put up a more dramatic verbal match with the BLM guy, it may have been the key. Being quick on your feet, like Tommy Robinson”– Everyone was wrong. Because I made it impossible to bait us into fail. Symbolism is for chicks and children. Men either follow strategy and tactics or they’re children. Look what the left does: the bait into ‘moments’ that they can misrepresent. Don’t do it. Gandhi until Vikings.