-“Can you testify to, and warranty that statement?”-
Of course not.
You’re just posturing.
Lying.
Polluting the informational commons.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 22:12:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411085403197788160
Theme: Truth
-
“Can you testify to, and warranty that statement?”- Of course not. You’re just p
-
Wellm the truth requires true PREMISES. Given the limitations of the logical, ph
Wellm the truth requires true PREMISES.
Given the limitations of the logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws, is Doolittle’s Propertarianism more moral and just than any other possible alternative? Yes.
The thing is that it’s possible. No other system is 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 22:09:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411084658503294976
Reply addressees: @NotGovernor @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411083639023091719
-
Stephan. I’m on the spectrum. I don’t ‘feel’ anything but logical consistency, e
Stephan. I’m on the spectrum. I don’t ‘feel’ anything but logical consistency, external correspondence, and operational possibility.
Jewish argument like german, french and russian techniques are just inherited pseudo-logics that justify their internal group strategy(ethics).
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 19:28:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411044067040010244
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411040430888792064
-
We are simply in the end of the century where empiricism had to fight off the je
We are simply in the end of the century where empiricism had to fight off the jewish sophistry just like we fought off the russian literary, german rationali, french philosophical. And we are not finished with the Islamic fundamentalist.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 18:47:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411033833479323650
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411031873829101573
-
A principle as an incomplete sentence is a means of evading a testable argument.
A principle as an incomplete sentence is a means of evading a testable argument. Non-aggression against WHAT Stephan? Is Blackmail aggression? No? Does blackmail produce retaliation? Yes. So material intersubjectivity is clearly false. “You don’t choose limits, retaliation does.”
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 18:40:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411032114871640064
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella @lawrence1978_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411029675929919495
-
7. There isn’t any ‘philosophy’ in my work any longer. The purpose of science (p
7. There isn’t any ‘philosophy’ in my work any longer. The purpose of science (producing testimony) consists of discovering and articulating the laws of nature at every stage of stable relations (complexity), as an unambiguous operational (formal) logic.
…
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 17:00:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006926507421703
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006925416939521
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6. By maintaining an ‘-ism’ we associate our work on the SCIENCE of DECIDABILITY(law) with these prior philosophical sophistries (secular theologies), where philosophy serves as a secular bridge between theology and science. And the work is an anti-philosophy (science).
…Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411006925416939521
-
9. From the perspective of the ‘intellectual industry’ what we have done is prov
9. From the perspective of the ‘intellectual industry’ what we have done is provided the Scientific counter to the Positive Law sophistry that was brought into anglo common law via Bentham and Austin. But Mostly by the Jewish Positive Movement: Kelsen, Rez, Hart, and Dworkin.
…
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 17:00:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006928617095172
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006927576997894
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
8. So positioning the work as philosophy even by association is just creating a “False Promise” of yet another secular theological justification – not the science that we have produced. (IMO this is part of the reason we still attract the wrong crowd (“nitwits and midwits”)).
…Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411006927576997894
-
5. My work transformed justificationary Jewish pilpul (sophistry) of Rothbard, a
5. My work transformed justificationary Jewish pilpul (sophistry) of Rothbard, and German Rationalism (sophistry) of Kant to Hegel to Marx to Habermas to Hoppe, into anglo science and operational logic completing the scientific revolution, and defining the scientific method.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 17:00:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006924330577929
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006923219025922
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4. But that expansion of social science into all cognitive and behavioral science is just a tiny part of the work. Testimonial Truth, Reciprocity, Operational Logic, Grammars, the explanation of European group strategy, and a universal European constitutional law followed.
…Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411006923219025922
-
4. But that expansion of social science into all cognitive and behavioral scienc
4. But that expansion of social science into all cognitive and behavioral science is just a tiny part of the work. Testimonial Truth, Reciprocity, Operational Logic, Grammars, the explanation of European group strategy, and a universal European constitutional law followed.
…
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-02 17:00:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006923219025922
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411006922183032836
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
2. When I started out, I thought I was just going to convert Hoppe’s work from continental rationalism to anglo science.
3. I used ‘Propertarianism’ because of my expansion of Hoppe’s reduction of all questions of social science to tests of property to all human behavior.
…Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411006922183032836
-
which is precisely why the m-pomo-pc-woke-anti-white world is rebelling against
which is precisely why the m-pomo-pc-woke-anti-white world is rebelling against scientific truth.
Because it says they’re genetically, and evolutionarily unfit.
And it’s rational that they’d hate it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-30 18:16:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1410301104764620807
Reply addressees: @PsycheJujutsu
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1410257071484723204