I don’t use proof. I use falsification. Claims of “proof” are lying. We don’t ‘prove’ anything is true. We remove doubt that alternatives are true. Ergo, a process of elimination What you mean by ‘proof’ is justification which itself is a technique of deceit.
The answer is exhaustive falsification. I’ve used adversarial falsifiction on every single scientific discipline in order to discover the first principles that are common to all disciplines. That first principle turns out to be relatively simple. It’s just undesirable.
How do you ask a logical question without the prior of logic, and what does logic consist of if it’s a prior. You can’t even ask me that question unless you grant that I can rely on logic.
There is no exception to the rule, and there can be no exception to the rule. You are welcome to test the rule by trying to find an exception. You are not welcome to use feminine, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Pilpul (deceit) to claim there is any other test than falsification.
8) But as in all laws of the universe, once discovered by any they are available to all. And those who obey those laws of the universe will benefit in degree of consistency with that obedience, and those who do not will suffer in degree with that disobedience.
8) But as in all laws of the universe, once discovered by any they are available to all. And those who obey those laws of the universe will benefit in degree of consistency with that obedience, and those who do not will suffer in degree with that disobedience.
7) This is the law of man, nature, and nature’s god, discovered by European Men, and the reason for the disproportionate rate of evolution of superiority in discovery, invention, and adaptation, and the conditions of western civilization above those of others who did not.
@susanKslomo You lie because you cannot testify to the truth of any of your claims. You can only testify to the faith of your claims. Therefore you cannot claim that your statements are truths, only beliefs. As such you are limited to making claims to the pragmatic utility of your beliefs despite their not being truths. In other words you are a participant in the social construction of a big lie just like the ‘woke’ generation participates in the social construction of a big lie. And you are being defeated not by secularists who persue the scientific truth, but by those who are even better social constructors of big lies than you are. All abrahamic religons whether they are founded on the supernatural occult as in judaism, christianity, and islam, or founded on supernormal pseudoscience as in marxism, postmodernism, feminism, pc-woke, and anti-whiteness use the same strategy: false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: scarcity, the nature of man, the malleability of man, and the persistence of natural selection, in the supernatural case by utopia after death, and in the pseudoscientific dase, as truth after ‘whiteness’. The purpose of faith is to infantilize. To prevent you from reaching adulthood. To insulate you from the status signals that say you are at the bottom of the gene pool. That is the purpose of faith: to make you tolerate the tragedy of the merciless command of nature and nature’s god: innovate, adapt, evolve, or die.
-“norms start with a choice between absolute meaning of existence within the given constraints (which leads to systems), nihilism (which, depending on whether you care about innate preferences, either leads to the numbing or chaos), or waffling between them.”-
Prophets provide evolutionary adaptation by altering the group strategy with truthful promises, and false prophets spread maladaptation by false promises of freedom from the costs of adaptation. https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1438569311363346432