0ctober 24th Chat: The science, evolutionary computation, truth
https://youtu.be/H8B7dNdFvpw
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 19:58:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452363824422653961
Theme: Truth
-
0ctober 24th Chat: The science, evolutionary computation, truth
-
Prove it
Prove it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 19:43:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452360164426797056
Reply addressees: @GoyKeane @DorianGray321 @entoliberal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452359987536269320
-
slippery slopes are easily prevented. they are also easily exploited. That’s why
slippery slopes are easily prevented. they are also easily exploited. That’s why knowledge, truth, and law to enforce it is necessary.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 19:42:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452359753695383561
Reply addressees: @DorianGray321 @GoyKeane @entoliberal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452359592793579526
-
I deal with the truth. I don’t deal with lies. No matter how comforting. I leave
I deal with the truth. I don’t deal with lies. No matter how comforting. I leave that to the rest of you.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 19:38:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452358794017640458
Reply addressees: @the_Sigilite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452358500877807616
-
GSRRM. More evidence of female feels over reals, GSRRM over argument. Fraud over
GSRRM. More evidence of female feels over reals, GSRRM over argument. Fraud over truth. Parasitism over production.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 17:35:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452327974854971395
Reply addressees: @BucMon21 @KuduPunctilious
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452327522595655698
-
The problem is that Twitter brevity inhibits chains of reasoning in a discourse
The problem is that Twitter brevity inhibits chains of reasoning in a discourse so we find (idiots) seeing a tweet out of context, and both unintentionally and intentionally failing to understand and misrepresenting what is said. Twitter generates conflict and it’s profitable to.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 17:14:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452322638743883781
Reply addressees: @slovborg @james__jenko @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452316850805780489
-
Professor #Lumuba is a thinker, and a leader, who can deliver truth and wisdom w
Professor #Lumuba is a thinker, and a leader, who can deliver truth and wisdom with near-religious inspiration. Africa is the largest example of “united we stand, but divided we fall.” There is no shortcut to sovereignty. It requires reciprocal preference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmXSi6_vFAI
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 14:42:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452284272526643210
-
Unfortunately it doesn’t occur to anyone that the intuitionistic and operational
Unfortunately it doesn’t occur to anyone that the intuitionistic and operational movement (revolution) was identifying the difference between symbolic mathematics as sophistry, vs computational mathematics as science. As such we lost a century to pseudo-math -> pseudoscience.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-23 13:49:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451908521365319685
Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451907957160136708
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BobMurphyEcon While I’m hostile to the abuse of the Austrian economic method by Mises and Rothbard, the point is that only the austrians including Mises, intuited the problem in math and science, that was the intuitionistic and operationalist revolution – that failed especially in economics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1451907957160136708
-
Of course, this is the reason for “In vino veritas”
Of course, this is the reason for “In vino veritas”. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1451717279977295872
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-23 01:24:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451721077009395712
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1451717279977295872
-
The adversarial method, king of the hill games, are the same epistemology as whe
The adversarial method, king of the hill games, are the same epistemology as when Neo fights Seraph in the Matrix: “You do not really know someone until you fight them”.
You do not learn the first principles of an individual or group by discourse, or cooperation, but by conflict.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-23 01:09:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451717279977295872