PAINFUL TRUTH BEFORE FACE REGARDLESS OF COST https://t.co/6tPzmpBKXy

Source date (UTC): 2021-11-23 21:22:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1463256726900203524

PAINFUL TRUTH BEFORE FACE REGARDLESS OF COST https://t.co/6tPzmpBKXy

Source date (UTC): 2021-11-23 21:22:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1463256726900203524
Truth is enough. Truth before face, regardless of cost, producing reciprocity in display word and deed. But we must protect the informational commons from false promise and deceit, for truth and truth before face, to restore the high trust, participatory, civil society, and duty.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-23 21:21:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1463256312830210053
Um… odd that if you can state that you don’t see what’s wrong with it.
Again. What’s True? (a) it MOSTLY kills the aged (b) we should secure the aged and leave the rest working (c) it would still affect the them (d) leaving the choice up to the individual (if no aged contact.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-23 06:44:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1463035811180564480
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @WesternRenaiss2 @TheAutistocrat @LukeWeinhagen @brandon @NathanWiens9
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1463025822630035456
@Bobbmarly You can’t testify to that. You can only lie that you can testify to that. It is a lie to assert as true that which you cannot, and others cannot, testify to.
This is the ‘problem’ with abrahamic religions. They teach you to lie. Confucianism doesn’t. European religions didn’t.
If there is a god we can only know his will through evidence we can testify to.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-22 17:00:08 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107321780389361082
@Bobbmarly We cannot testify to the existence of god. We can only testify to the human want of one. And the utility of such a thing.
Much of humanity does not believe in god or practice an equivalent solution.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-22 16:53:43 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107321755113628705
REVELATION IS JUST WISDOM: IT’S ONLY TRUE ENOUGH.
— “Revelation versus reason, and people who respond well to arguments based upon either source of truth.” —
That’s false (lie) of course, and it’s evidence of the Abrahamic method of lying (conflation). Truth must be testifiable and the testifiable must be falsifiable.
So: meaning (felt and imaginary), wisdom (argued and verbal ), science (discovered and physical).
If we say instead of Truth (testimony), meaning true enough to decide in matters of conflict, that we mean ‘true enough for me to act” then yes we might claim true enough as ‘true’.
True Enough For Daily Life , True enough for Testmony with consequence, vs Competent Enough to understand it beyond yourself and your daily life.
So we can truthfully (testify) that the difference between true proper and true enough covers the spectrum from science to law to philosophy ideology to theology to the occult, to magic.
There is however some empirical value to wisdom literature that survives for centuries
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-22 16:31:44 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107321668688389131
So we can truthfully (testify) that the difference between true proper and true enough covers the spectrum from science to law to philosophy ideology to theology to the occult, to magic. There is however some empirical value to wisdom literature that survives for centuries
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-22 16:27:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462820150579716100
Reply addressees: @JAndrewLauer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462817865036410885
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JAndrewLauer If we say instead of Truth (testimony), meaning true enough to decide in matters of conflict, that we mean ‘true enough for me to act” then yes we might claim true enough as ‘true’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1462817865036410885
If we say instead of Truth (testimony), meaning true enough to decide in matters of conflict, that we mean ‘true enough for me to act” then yes we might claim true enough as ‘true’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-22 16:18:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462817865036410885
Reply addressees: @JAndrewLauer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462817562711011330
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JAndrewLauer That’s false (lie) of course, and it’s evidence of the Abrahamic method of lying (conflation). Truth must be testifiable and the testifiable must be falsifiable. So meaning (felt and imaginary), wisdom (argued and verbal ), science (discovered and physical).
(more…)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1462817562711011330
That’s false (lie) of course, and it’s evidence of the Abrahamic method of lying (conflation). Truth must be testifiable and the testifiable must be falsifiable. So meaning (felt and imaginary), wisdom (argued and verbal ), science (discovered and physical).
(more…)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-22 16:17:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462817562711011330
Reply addressees: @JAndrewLauer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1462817040419504128
THE WORD OF MEN MUST BE TRUSTED, BUT THE WORD OF GOD IS EVIDENT.
Evolution is not only true, but ‘evolve‘ was the one, first, word god spoke, and the only word he needed to. Beware the word of men who claim they heard the word of god, vs the word of god that is visible throughout every aspect the universe if we only learn the skill to read it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-22 15:45:29 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107321486820904873