@Shlomo_Baggins@RedPilledWorld@voxday
Well, I mean, what is it that I have purportedly lied about? And if you think so how will you testify to that fact?
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 02:11:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107771272205581830
@asomd2021@Wanderers_Choice@RadioFreeNorthwest
Yes to clarify, there is a difference between continuous increase in precision and falsehood. And there is a difference between a law, a first principle, a settled theory, a working theory, a proposed theory, and a hypothesis.
Most science since the greeks has continuously increased in precision rather than falsified the entirety of the theory. And even those theories that are stated as scientific laws. For example there is something wrong with the formula for gravity but that does not mean the theory is false. It means it is only incompete.
From Aristotle to newton to einstein has been an increase in precision. And gravity is still incomplete. Was newton wrong? no. at human scale his theory was sufficient, but in retrospect it was incomplete.
Why? Because a theory, like all knowledge, consists of the narrative by which we identify opportunities to make use of the theory, the narrative we use to explain causality, and the formula by which we measure the observations.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 02:11:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107771269066692370
Boost of @curtd@asomd2021@Wanderers_Choice@RadioFreeNorthwest
Yes to clarify, there is a difference between continuous increase in precision and falsehood. And there is a difference between a law, a first principle, a settled theory, a working theory, a proposed theory, and a hypothesis.
Most science since the greeks has continuously increased in precision rather than falsified the entirety of the theory. And even those theories that are stated as scientific laws. For example there is something wrong with the formula for gravity but that does not mean the theory is false. It means it is only incompete.
From Aristotle to newton to einstein has been an increase in precision. And gravity is still incomplete. Was newton wrong? no. at human scale his theory was sufficient, but in retrospect it was incomplete.
Why? Because a theory, like all knowledge, consists of the narrative by which we identify opportunities to make use of the theory, the narrative we use to explain causality, and the formula by which we measure the observations.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 02:11:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107771329183898832
@StevenV Quite the opposite. I defeat yoru lies by exposing every little detail of them and that is why you cannot stand it -why it provokes your moroal outrage. Because it is your lies and fighting for survival while the use your body as a puppet.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 01:44:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107771164450750759
WHY THE METHODOLOGY SUCCEEDS
I just work harder and longer and more exhaustively to seek to undrestand over time frames and at personal cost few can afford to pay.
— “Exhaustive Continuous Adversarial Disambiguation, by Serialization and Operationalization, Resulting in a Single Most Parsimonious Paradigm, First Principles, Vocabulary, Grammar and Operational Logic as a Univerally Commensurable System of Measurement, that Permits the Falsification of all Claims Across all Human disciplines.” —
That’s the method. Once you know the methodology then you have to attack every problem you seek to understand exhaustively. And you have to be wiling to throw out every single thing you already hold dear, including your most sacred cows, if you want to discover the truth.
So it’s just not a matter of skill, or intelligence, but of personality: you have to be capable of the truth. And it appears that few of us are. And all of them are male.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 20:30:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769929892820158
THE UNIFICATION OF THE ARYAN AND CHRISTIAN
“Seek To Understand” isn’t just the way to win friends and influence people, it’s the answer to the problem of epistemology, just as christian love is the answer to cooperation at scale: our brains developed a desire for efficiency, but this evolved for reducing physical not verbal or mental costs. As such, both seeking to understand, and exhausting potential for forgiveness, rae the means by which the ariyan and christian achieve both superior political and superior social ends.
Most of us seek to agree or disagree rather than to understand. And when we can understand we double down on priors. My contribution to our civilization is to understand this failing of human consciousness, and to instead, ‘exhaust’ our potential to understand and to cooperate. And in doign so master ourselves, this universe, and those we conquer and rule this universe with: one another.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 19:16:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769637456546205
@Wanderers_Choice Aother thing. you’re equating being honest with selective memory. My point is to be honest in anglo saxon, english, american terms, but just stating the policy in law. This requries you learn a bit, so that you can mature from religion, philosophy, and ideology, to science, economics, logic and law. And all that requiers is understnading the work we’re doing on the constitution. you don’t have to understand all the science and logic behind it. That’s just for people who are playing the role of ‘judges’ undre that law. I am teaching a group of judges. Those judges will teach a generation of judges. Germans don’t comprehend kant or anglos comprenend hume, but we both live them every single day.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 19:05:32 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769595954845617
Again, you prove I am right by claiming you can testify to what you cannot, when others who can have testified to the opposite. I sweat because I am a man. If you don’t then you are less of a man, if you are a man at all, which by using the female method of deceit and denial is increasingly unlikely.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:48:47 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769530121937849
@Snidely_Whiplash @LegionnaireBear @Black_Rabbi @RenegadeScoutr @voxday
PROSECUTING THE VOX-DAY SHORT BUS:
PULL TESTIMONY FROM THE DEFENDANT, SUCH THAT HE INCRIMNATES HIMSELF BY DEMONSTRATING HE CAN”T TESTIFY TO WHAT HE CLAIMS
— “If the error is obvious, why don’t you spell it out here?
Gariepy not only never refuted it, he observably failed to understand it.
If fixation is dependent on genetic bottlenecks, you would require a genetic bottleneck every generation to fix the number of genetic mutations into the human genome that would be required to explain the genetic differences between humans and chimps.
A genetic bottleneck for literally every generation, where the breeding population is reduced to a few hundred or a few thousand closely related individuals. Every generation.
So, no, you don’t get to clain Gariepy has disproved the math, you stupid fuck.” — Another Vox Moron
OMG I can’t believe you’re that stupid. But then, I know you had to go look it up and try to find some excuse that you could pretend you understood.
So, no. (Though, as I understand it JFG and I are going to cover this on Thursday Night’s show. )
In the meantime, try to demonstrate that you know what you’re talking about by explaining the variables that are assumed and unaccounted for between the variation rate and the fixation rate, that are allowing you to come to the false conclusion, and justify your socially constructed supernatural fraud.
I know you can’t. lol I know I can and I certainly know JFG can because I’ve read and heard him say it at least a dozen times.
The fact that you don’t know, is evidence you don’t know what you’re talking about. yet if I supply the information you don’t know, you will, repeating what you just did, run off and try to find another excuse that you can pretend you understand.
Talking to you morons is like talking to kindergarteners.
JFG is a teacher. He’s trying to help you understand.
But I’m a Judge, I’m trying to prevent you from continuing committing your crimes, by demonstrating that you’re not just wrong, but that you’re criminals.
And I’m doing just fine in doing so. 😉 Because you take the bait every time. Which is the whole point of agitating your moral outrage so that you stay in the discourse long enough to expose yourself.
Which again, you morons fall for every time.
It’s just ordinary courtroom procedures.
I’m just using it on you.
The jury figures it out.
I don’t even have to say it until after they already have.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:51:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769305441721043
@WhitesAdvocate@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday
Lies by the conflation of fiction with fictionalism, because the liar refused to do due diligence because the liar has been taught to lie, by the Abrahamic method of lying, which is an institutionalization of the female method of lying, which is the means by which women seduce children, other women, and men to do their will.
FICTION: A narrative that does not claim it is true, and instead specifically claims it is not.
FICTIONALISM: Claims it is not fiction, but true. Fictionalisms are created by one or more deceptions of the three categories of human faculties:
(a) Imaginary: Occult -> Theology
(b) Verbal: Sophistry -> Idealism (philosophy)
(c) Physical: Magic -> Pseudoscience and Pseudomathematics)
There. I helped you learn the difference between fiction and fictionalism.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 17:39:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769258061553048