Under P-Law, Adam Schiff would almost literally be unable to speak. Why? Everything he says is either a lie, seditious, or treasonous.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 20:37:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522314687123234819
Under P-Law, Adam Schiff would almost literally be unable to speak. Why? Everything he says is either a lie, seditious, or treasonous.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 20:37:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522314687123234819
We don’t do anti-biology. We do anti-falsehood. So we do a lot of anti-ideology, anti-philosophy, and anti-theology. The optimum religion for man, with the greatest mindfulness, is the truth – and our celebration that only together do we overcome the tragedy of nature’s laws.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 20:16:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522309393580281856
Playing the race card instead of the truth card.
Is musk trying to restore truthful reciprocal discourse that makes democratic polities possible?
Yes. So why undermine him other than to socially construct a distraction, deceit, fraud?
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 19:58:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522304629299728384
Reply addressees: @x_matter @TheLaurenChen @nytimes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522246841185746944
–“I’ve [read] Degenerate Moderns, by the way. It’s a fun read but the only useful major insight you can take from it, is that leftists justify their intuitions including their immoral desires … with ideology. (Social Construction) – Martin Stepan
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 17:35:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522268829983944704
If I wanted to increase popularity, followers, and donations, I’d justify every prior that I could across the spectrum – but fail to provide a solution. If I seek to provide a solution I will falsify every prior I can across the spectrum but produce a new small number of elites.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 14:47:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522226539470934017
I know it sounds ‘out there’ but there is a reason that truth, prosperity, choice, happiness, mindfulness, and religion are universal desires, and a reason that thought, word, and deed that’s consistent and correspondence with the universe brings them all into being. https://twitter.com/ThruTheHayes/status/1522181842778181634
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 14:41:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522224922533240833
–“Lastly epistemology. Think you’re f_cking smart? Hang with Curt and Martin and Luke for seminar and you’ll see how flimsy your epistemology is. Hang with me for example and you’ll spot (and fix) every Platonism in the hard sciences and all our specialties.” — @MichaelSurrago
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-04 13:53:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521850538572328961
Profound insight from using PMethod unconsciously today, on an unrelated personal matter, and realizing that the reason I haven’t understood this issue before, is I never tried to serialize and disambiguate it before, so never identified the first cause of the series.
Amazing.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-03 19:06:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521566917722615808
BTW: only neurotics use GSRRM as a substitute for argument. Here: let me help you with the female method of deceit, by conflating approval with truth: https://t.co/JP6AFXTy74

Source date (UTC): 2022-05-03 13:55:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521488679059038216
Reply addressees: @HrhOrchid @jetf23 @bopinion @GallupNews @MikeBloomberg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521484983155802112
DIFFERENCES
Testimony -> Truth
Sophistry -> Doubt (uncertainty)
Pilpul -> Deceit
Critique -> Undermining
Denial -> Evasion
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-03 12:41:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521469970810605569