RT @curtdoolittle: @thatdbemethatd @RyanOConnor3 Why do you think you know that rather than only ‘believe’ it?
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-10 18:45:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568672124260466690
RT @curtdoolittle: @thatdbemethatd @RyanOConnor3 Why do you think you know that rather than only ‘believe’ it?
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-10 18:45:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568672124260466690
Doesn’t contradict the purpose of repeating this chant that I have to every now and then whenever I say something truthful and beneficial for all that ‘enemies’ can try to frame as evil.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-10 18:45:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568671916256366592
Reply addressees: @jdvelex
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568671410167631872
Why do you think you know that rather than only ‘believe’ it?
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-10 18:41:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568671042247471104
Reply addressees: @thatdbemethatd @RyanOConnor3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568670369741180928
Why do you imagine you’re not wrong?
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-10 18:12:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568663627657363458
Reply addressees: @Anoraky4Cymru
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568296398029819904
I’d need evidence you’d debunked similiar arguments rather than claiming you have. Worse, I’d need evidence you understood my argument – I’m not certain you did. The reality is what it is. The problem is that female intuition in favor of anti-competitive sedition creeps slowly.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-09 16:42:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568278737111896064
Reply addressees: @NatroxNL @ramzpaul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1551130089227972608
Perhaps you shouldn’t interject insults when you’re insulted by painful truths.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-08 20:41:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567976479849598976
Reply addressees: @CapAnderson4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567971464279916544
Evidence is what it is.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-07 19:23:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567594522015633408
Reply addressees: @MGFreelance
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567594265403867138
I think outsiders don’t readily observe that we don’t start with a presumption of good, we seek truth, reciprocity, and full accounting first, and then determine whether a presumption is in fact ‘good’ or ‘bad’. Many intuitive goods are in fact not so.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-07 18:37:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567582944570507267
Exactly. The truth is I forget how the nitwits think and refreshers help me understand just how dim a group of bots (NPCs) they are. Sometimes I think of something new. this time I did. I can amplify scott adams’ theory with a bit more precision.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-07 18:00:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567573467926564864
Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567572885736419328
For my part I have to produce law that prohibits political fraud in public to the public in matters public, and explain the methods by which frauds are perpetuated, with testable criteria so that we can outlaw it.
We can end the left forever.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-07 17:58:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567573074689540096
Reply addressees: @pc20917967
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567572648741474304