Theme: Truth

  • Q: “Curt: How long do you think each day on ways to be a bigger a– than the day

    Q: “Curt: How long do you think each day on ways to be a bigger a– than the day prior?”

    I keep working at incrementally discovering the limit of human instinct, intuition, ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, magical thinking, incompetence, stupidity and denial – and through extraordinary diligence I uncover new people with ever-increasing new depths of such stupidity, by testing for their deviation from the tedious, boring, mechanical rules of the universe.

    It’s not hard.
    This is social media.
    It’s a rich vein of stupidity to mine.

    Thank you dear mouse.
    Here is some cheese.
    Now scuttle along. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 19:15:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635359045035909120

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635357305234661376

  • I do the science. I don’t have to like it. Disapproval is irrelevant. I don’t ha

    I do the science.
    I don’t have to like it.
    Disapproval is irrelevant.
    I don’t have the choice of comfortable lies.
    And over time, none of us do.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 18:55:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635353987858980864

    Reply addressees: @thenoahkinsey

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635352075898085378

  • Not an argument. Disapproval doesn’t impact truth. Sorry

    Not an argument.
    Disapproval doesn’t impact truth.
    Sorry.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 18:53:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635353426388471808

    Reply addressees: @IainTProud

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635352103811158016

  • (cognitive science) “Q: Abstractly speaking, does your brain actually care about

    (cognitive science)
    “Q: Abstractly speaking, does your brain actually care about what you believe as real reality, or does it just go along with whatever beliefs you hold?”

    THE ONE CORRECT ANSWER
    Your brain operates by organizing Itself to produce increasingly long time frames of successful prediction, into episodes(identifiers, indexes) of associations (causal relations) that can be stored (remembered) as associations of fragments (sensations, edges, surfaces, objects, movements, paths, backgrounds), including the fascinating bits of eye, head, torso, limb position, movement, direction, speed, space within a location, and associations between present and other locations. (Just (exactly) like a 3D video game). So your brain doesn’t have anything to care about other than organizing inputs from your nerves into an episode that can predict your ability to act in the real world.

    So your brain doesn’t care so much as it learns to keep your nervous system from objecting to variations from homeostasis (not objecting) where objecting consists of nerves detecting risk, scarcity, harm, or damage. The very thing you call you is a really tiny bit of your brainstem, not very different from a thermometer, that asks your brain to help it change its condition. Your brain evolved to change the body’s condition. This is why all of your brain, like all brains, evolved from organizing muscles to move: change condition.

    Your brain is about as dumb a thing as possible, and from the moment of neural tube formation begins to learn what is related to what, and continues throughout life, with the difference being similar to how babies, children, and youth, teens and young adults, incrementally make sounds, learn a word, put words together, put phrases together, and eventually learn to speak their minds, eventually understand others minds, understand the world, and engage in conversation, and over time learn how to negotiate, convince, narrate, and eventually if possible narrate, or tell stories. This process – in language – is the same for every single thing we learn across the spectrum of what we CAN learn.

    This is why we observe the real world so nearly perfectly, but we predict (reason, imagine, fantasize, daydream) how to act in it so poorly. 😉

    A nerve does nothing but vibrate at different rates. We have no model of the world. We have only successful prediction of moment to moment to chains of moments, to stories of chains of moments, to sort the world into sights, smells, sounds, touches, etc. As our neurons slowly organize all those vibrations of all those nerves into an order, that we experience as awareness, and that we reflect upon as consciousness.

    The brain is really simple really. That’s why it’s even more amazing.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 17:56:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635339089703477256

  • (cognitive science) “Q: Abstractly speaking, does your brain actually care about

    (cognitive science)
    “Q: Abstractly speaking, does your brain actually care about what you believe as real reality, or does it just go along with whatever beliefs you hold?”

    THE ONE CORRECT ANSWER
    Your brain operates by organizing Itself to produce increasingly long time frames of successful prediction, into episodes(identifiers, indexes) of associations (causal relations) that can be stored (remembered) as associations of fragments (sensations, edges, surfaces, objects, movements, paths, backgrounds), including the fascinating bits of eye, head, torso, limb position, movement, direction, speed, space within a location, and associations between present and other locations. (Just (exactly) like a 3D video game). So your brain doesn’t have anything to care about other than organizing inputs from your nerves into an episode that can predict your ability to act in the real world.

    So your brain doesn’t care so much as it learns to keep your nervous system from objecting to variations from homeostasis (not objecting) where objecting consists of nerves detecting risk, scarcity, harm, or damage. The very thing you call you is a really tiny bit of your brainstem, not very different from a thermometer, that asks your brain to help it change its condition. Your brain evolved to change the body’s condition. This is why all of your brain, like all brains, evolved from organizing muscles to move: change condition.

    Your brain is about as dumb a thing as possible, and from the moment of neural tube formation begins to learn what is related to what, and continues throughout life, with the difference being similar to how babies, children, and youth, teens and young adults, incrementally make sounds, learn a word, put words together, put phrases together, and eventually learn to speak their minds, eventually understand others minds, understand the world, and engage in conversation, and over time learn how to negotiate, convince, narrate, and eventually if possible narrate, or tell stories. This process – in language – is the same for every single thing we learn across the spectrum of what we CAN learn.

    This is why we observe the real world so nearly perfectly, but we predict (reason, imagine, fantasize, daydream) how to act in it so poorly. 😉

    A nerve does nothing but vibrate at different rates. We have no model of the world. We have only successful prediction of moment to moment to chains of moments, to stories of chains of moments, to sort the world into sights, smells, sounds, touches, etc. As our neurons slowly organize all those vibrations of all those nerves into an order, that we experience as awareness, and that we reflect upon as consciousness.

    The brain is really simple really. That’s why it’s even more amazing.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 17:56:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635339089481179144

  • “Q: What is the difference between Continental and Analytic philosophy?” Anglo E

    “Q: What is the difference between Continental and Analytic philosophy?”

    Anglo Empiricism evolved from Law; Science evolved from Empiricism; and Anglo Analytic philosophy evolved from Science. It’s continuously deflationary. Anglo analytic philosophy attempted to develop Decidability (Truth)

    Continental Philosophy evolved from Literature. It is conflationary. Seeking to provide Wisdom (Good)

    The only ‘enlightenment’ was the Anglo empirical. The rest of the continent (French, German, Jewish, and Russian) retaliated against the empirical enlightenment with literature that attempted to preserve the authority of church and state in secular prose, using the method of argument and values of the nation(culture) of the authors that produced them. French Maternal Authoritarianism, German Duty, Ashkenazi Separatism, and Russian Nihilism.

    Continental philosophy is best categorized as Wisdom Literature: Literary Moral Fictionalism. (Plato)

    Anglo analytic philosophy is best categorized as Law: Science of Testimony. (Aristotle)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 17:32:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635332900550746118

  • “Q: What is the difference between Continental and Analytic philosophy?” Anglo E

    “Q: What is the difference between Continental and Analytic philosophy?”

    Anglo Empiricism evolved from Law; Science evolved from Empiricism; and Anglo Analytic philosophy evolved from Science. It’s continuously deflationary. Anglo analytic philosophy attempted to develop Decidability (Truth)

    Continental Philosophy evolved from Literature. It is conflationary. Seeking to provide Wisdom (Good)

    The only ‘enlightenment’ was the Anglo empirical. The rest of the continent (French, German, Jewish, and Russian) retaliated against the empirical enlightenment with literature that attempted to preserve the authority of church and state in secular prose, using the method of argument and values of the nation(culture) of the authors that produced them. French Maternal Authoritarianism, German Duty, Ashkenazi Separatism, and Russian Nihilism.

    Continental philosophy is best categorized as Wisdom Literature: Literary Moral Fictionalism. (Plato)

    Anglo analytic philosophy is best categorized as Law: Science of Testimony. (Aristotle)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 17:32:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635332900437610497

  • Ok. There is no savage assessment to make. There is no constructive criticism to

    Ok. There is no savage assessment to make. There is no constructive criticism to offer. Now, that said, I was trained in art criticism (drilled actually), that one must demonstrate care, consideration, and effort, by finding SOMETHING to criticize or suggest, else we cannot know the value of one’s opinion, or that one read it, or is even honestly speaking. All I can really offer is that I can determine you’re correct because I grasp what you mean despite the brevity, vocabulary, and examples you use. And that you might want to learn to convert each of your paragraphs to ‘proof’ language. And in doing so demonstrate you have not only gleand the meaning, but also mastered the methodology. But does that matter? So why would I do that? So I won’t. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 16:01:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635310156039835649

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635301149141241856

  • Ok. There is no savage assessment to make. There is no constructive criticism to

    Ok. There is no savage assessment to make. There is no constructive criticism to offer. Now, that said, I was trained in art criticism (drilled actually), that one must demonstrate care, consideration, and effort, by finding SOMETHING to criticize or suggest, else we cannot know the value of one’s opinion, or that one read it, or is even honestly speaking. All I can really offer is that I can determine you’re correct because I grasp what you mean despite the brevity, vocabulary, and examples you use. And that you might want to learn to convert each of your paragraphs to ‘proof’ language. And in doing so demonstrate you have not only gleand the meaning, but also mastered the methodology. But does that matter? So why would I do that? So I won’t. 😉

    Reply addressees: @kontherad1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 16:01:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635310155934965767

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635301149141241856

  • Brevity is the soul of wit (analogy, suggestion, deceit), while operational pros

    Brevity is the soul of wit (analogy, suggestion, deceit), while operational prose is the grammar of testimony (truth).

    I can write logic, algorithms, operational proofs (what you’re objecting to), arguments, essays, opinion, history, fiction, scripts, and poetry with near equal facility.

    But my job – requires the paradigm, logic, vocabulary, and syntax of testimonial truth: operational prose, including serialization as a mesurement in defense against ambiguity.

    It looks like ordinary language. But it’s closer to mathematics and programming, but using ordinal rather than cardinal logic.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 15:14:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635298293931556864

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635284366476861444


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Well, you don’t know this, but you should be for engaging with me, that I work in cognitive science, behavioral economics, epistemology, testimony, law, and most especially the logic of lying. So just as when you go to a doctor or lawyer and speak, and in turn they disambiguate what you’ve said into causes, I do the same. It’s just that I see how you’re lying, defrauding, cheating, stealing, undermining, projecting, defending, evading, and denying. And work in this discipline unfortunately means a vast majority of the population is about as smart, cunning, witty, funny as a preschooler.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1635284366476861444