If you are willing to be that intellectually honest I’m willing to invest in you. That’s all I really require.
Would you be comfortable doing a livestream or recorded session with me? Or would you prefer we just take care of it here in text?
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:07:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012353053671426
Reply addressees: @JarradDMartinez @MartinC86461960 @DanAnde23836316 @nntaleb
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643010351632457730
JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES
(justice vs fairness vs equality vs equity vs proportionality)
Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.
The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.
Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality?
Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.
Only once we’ve restored reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.
The point is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality.
And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:06:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012132693213184
JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES
(justice vs fairness vs equality vs equity vs proportionality)
Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.
The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.
Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality?
Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.
Only once we’ve restored reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.
The point is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality.
And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:06:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012132890456064
I don’t recognize your alias here or remember it from FB. 😉 So I can only thank you for the respect. 😉
Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.
The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.,
Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality? Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.
Only onece we’ve restord reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.
The piont is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality. And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:03:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643011249532272640
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643002846386823169
I don’t recognize your alias here or remember it from FB. 😉 So I can only thank you for the respect. 😉
Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.
The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.,
Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality? Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.
Only onece we’ve restord reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.
The piont is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality. And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.
Reply addressees: @fukiffyknow
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:03:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643011249293197312
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643002846386823169
I love (a) that you’re kidding (b) that you’re willing to state your preferences anyway. (truth before face). lol
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 21:51:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643008405584396293
Reply addressees: @DanAnde23836316 @MartinC86461960 @nntaleb
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643006278489485312
I’m not undermining it. I’m just saying it’s fiction.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 19:42:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642975946104774658
Reply addressees: @JarradDMartinez @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642975733956898816
It’s another cute fiction. But it’s just that. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 19:37:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642974534054576128
Reply addressees: @JarradDMartinez @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642968516365041665
Why is it that your excessively empirical, analytical, truthful mind has to go and make my day worse with these daily truth spasms about the hopelessness of the mouth-breathing bots of the proletarian majority? 😉
-hugs
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 17:43:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642946010757431296
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642923476842430466
(Also, how many OTHER fallacies did IridoX use in that comment?)
I do science. What part of “out of touch” refers to the difference between using empirical data and using idiosyncratic experience? 😉 Um. You. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 17:41:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642945453602775040
Reply addressees: @ChadPitt15 @wifikilI @metomentodo @BretRoberts8 @__Stinkbug__ @polemicdrop
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640711123539468293