BTW: I don’t LIKE what i’ve learned. I just don’t lie about it to myself or anyone else.
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 02:24:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670256028603101185
Reply addressees: @MudKevin @dosontheshinshi @Barbarian_Brain
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670249060371161090
Not sure how you got to my ideas being laws of the universe. Instead that the laws of the universe exist whether we like them or not, and denying them is just lying and lying about them is the origin of the feminine, Abrahamic, marxist sequence.
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 01:27:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670241796532719616
Reply addressees: @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin @Barbarian_Brain
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670119354057326595
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
CORRECTIONS
1 – We can adapt a population’s IQ in as few as three and no more than six generations simply by reducing the bottom and repeat criminals – and the bottom is a huge drag on society, economy, and politics, and criminals are worse.
2 – It certainly appears that education in the sciences, converting many particular rules to a few general universal rules improved not iq, but demonstrated intelligence, by a half to a full standard deviation.
3 – It certainly appears that education in our work (don’t worry about it) in logical and behavioral science does about the same as did the physical sciences.
4 – No population on earth is prohibited from near to western or eastern success if they increase their IQ by education and regulated reproduction, and the rule of law that performs natural selection as a consequence.
5 – No population can adhere to natural law and achieve economic, social, and political prosperity without either the resource curse or raising their average IQ above ~92 to 95. And the higher above 100, the better, because only people above 105 can learn by reading instructions, repair machines, or self educate. And economic complexity is increasing every year, meaning intellectual demands on a population increase every year.
I don’t make the laws of the universe. But it’s my job and the job of our organization to try to prevent people from lying about the laws of the universe, and the consequences for mankind when we try to evade them.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1670119354057326595
RT @astrotrad: @curtdoolittle @Buck3DX @jordanbpeterson Truthful and incisive to the core of it:
“Dr Peterson works from the premise of the…
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 21:51:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670187440445726720
It’s not a dodgy subject at all. As the audience here can easily observe, you’ve done nothing but read pop sci articles and propaganda.
We solved the question of IQ in the 80s, the nature over nuture debate by 2000, sex differences in intelligence and personality by 2012, and race differences by 2018.
We now the direction of human evolution from chimps and it’s relatively simple (noteny) and that evolution has been accelerating – at least until the industrial revolution’s reversal of natural selection.
All we are doing is slowly accumulating the polygenic scores to try to determine if we can identify enough of the causally dense contributions to intelligence, personality and cognitive development.
Now, if you know anything at all you would state it.
I’m pretty rock solid on brain development beginning with neural tube formation, and migration of stem cells to different parts of the body, and from there the incremental evolutionary development of our brains.
I can discuss every single function in the process of the organization of the brain and resulting cognition and I’ve made educational videos on the subject, and have a handful left to produce.
So I know you’re a nitwit and I know you have psychological problems, because a full third of women have psychological problems (which we were warned about prior to women’s entry into the franchise). Of the remaining two thirds of women who lack mental problems, more than half demonstrate feminine proglems with cognition and I’ve documented the I’m painful detail, by explaining how the science of female antisocial behavior originates in neurological structure. In fact as far as I know I’m one of the top single digits of experts in the subject despite not wanting to be.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @helenfromhel @Barbarian_Brain @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 20:57:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670173763990614016
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670171159239745538
Note the dependence on idiosyncratic experience. Total absence of terminology or common knowledge in the field. Doubling down on disapproval in the absence of argument. Evasion and denial.
I mean I could ask the team to comment on your thread helen but the’ll just say your mentally unstable highly neurotic externalizing your dissatisfaction with your life’s failures, you’re low sexual market value, and low status and unlikability.
Reply addressees: @helenfromhel @Dek01907133
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 20:49:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670171764431675393
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670159898338836481
You’re proving my point that women can’t tell the difference between truth and preference – and lying as I’ve documented in detail, and explained with excruiciating precision.
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 19:19:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670149272879214593
Reply addressees: @helenfromhel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670148666483417088
You are demonstratly incorrect. You’re just opining (projecting) pretence of knowledge (lying).
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 19:19:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670149074501214208
Reply addressees: @XLColdJ @xMajorKills
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670148587504771075
Any use of “Sounds Like” is an admission of ignorance and stupidity, rather than knowledge comprehension and intelligence.
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:12:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670071938037829633
Reply addressees: @realdanstilwell @digitildream
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670062026041769984
Q: Curt: How did the left manage to escape the US Constitution in the first place?”
In simple terms: failing to solve free *truthful* speech and the consequences of failing to do so.
List:
– Failing to articulate the natural law, common law, and concurrency in the declaration…
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 20:11:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669799786013138964
Reply addressees: @tryanph
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669791606671831040
Q: Curt: How did the left manage to escape the US Constitution in the first place?”
In simple terms: failing to solve free *truthful* speech and the consequences of failing to do so.
List:
– Failing to articulate the natural law, common law, and concurrency in the declaration and constitution by assuming it, and not including Blackstone’s argument explicitly.
– Failing to articulate the european group evolutionary strategy of maximizing individual responsibility thereby suppression the existence of and need for authority, and thereby creating freedom and liberty.
– The Failure to solve the problem of truthful reciprocal speech rather than free speech. Failure to anticipate the ability to scale female antisocial behavior in education, media, and politics by maintaining common law prohibitions on it.
– The failure to preserve libel and slander, interference in occupation, interference in business, interference in marriage.
– The Failure to maintain common law prohibitions on limiting conflict to voluntary markets, reciprocal debate, court and duel, and the prohibition on breaking the kings (common law) peace.
– The problem of Christianity as a convenient deception using female antisocial behavior and opening the door for more false speech.
– The Failure to grasp that a religion must merely promote a false promise of freedom from any of the four sets of laws of the universe.
– The failure to recognize the marxist pseudoscientific sequence as the reformation of Judaism and Christianity as a new hostile religion exploiting female antisocial behavior, undermining natural, common, concurrent law.
– The failure (long-standing) to include baiting into hazard as a crime even more serious than fraud (the reason for repeated Jewish persecutions) and, therefore the failure to prosecute the marxist sequence like all leftism as baiting into hazard.
– The Failure to require judicial ascent for legislation to pass.
– The Failure to prevent lawfare by punishing those pursuing legal activism for attempts to undermine the constitution.
– The Failure to suppress and outlaw the marxist sequence as seditious and treason against the natural common concurrent law.
– The Failure to maintain the requirement for demonstrated responsibility (commercial producing property) for political participation.
– The Failure to preserve rule of law by the most egregious violation of it with the civil rights law legalizing reverse racism, and ending necessary integration required for the preservation of natural, common, concurrent law.
– The failure of all of the above by the introgression of women into politics and economy before educating and preventing these means of antisocial, antipolitical behavior.
While those are the major points, they’re just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-16 20:11:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669799785765675022