Theme: Truth

  • Rhetorical Fallacy. Insufficient action is indistinguishable from no action. Int

    Rhetorical Fallacy. Insufficient action is indistinguishable from no action. Intentions are irrelevant vs results.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 21:22:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665641046987153409

    Reply addressees: @CptTibbs @JulieBorowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665640307439116288


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665640307439116288

  • FWIW: ‘Condemnation’ from a culture of low trust, where lying and getting away w

    FWIW: ‘Condemnation’ from a culture of low trust, where lying and getting away with it are heroic activities, is meaningless.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 20:35:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665629268903333888

    Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665626555159216128


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JulieBorowski

    Muslims around the world condemn terrorism after the Paris attacks https://t.co/ROvGJ5kLkn via @qz

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665626555159216128

  • Why do I sentimentally agree with catholic intellectuals – in fact, we are all v

    Why do I sentimentally agree with catholic intellectuals – in fact, we are all very similar – but I do not see mysticism, god, or anything else non-factual as meaningful.

    I know that catholicism asks us to think universally. I know that it asks us to think intertemporally. I know that it forces us to think honestly. I know that the long history of the church matters a great deal.

    But maybe I know the alternatives, and that the same effect is achieved by multiple means?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 11:22:00 UTC

  • Brothers In Arms

    [I] care that you are intelligent, an aristotelian, christian, a warrior, speak the truth, and a friend. I do not care about the color of your skin. Just as I hope you do not care about the color of mine. Warriors are brothers all. Most of our conflict is the product of democracy in which political power can be used to obtain privilege by force of law. Otherwise, in the great war to transform the universe into eden, and man in to gods, we fight the universe as brothers in arms.

  • Brothers In Arms

    [I] care that you are intelligent, an aristotelian, christian, a warrior, speak the truth, and a friend. I do not care about the color of your skin. Just as I hope you do not care about the color of mine. Warriors are brothers all. Most of our conflict is the product of democracy in which political power can be used to obtain privilege by force of law. Otherwise, in the great war to transform the universe into eden, and man in to gods, we fight the universe as brothers in arms.

  • There is no more reason we should fear teaching testimonialism’s extension of th

    There is no more reason we should fear teaching testimonialism’s extension of the scientific method, than we fear teaching grammar, rhetoric, or newtonian physics. Because unlike mathematics, chemistry, and post-newtonian physics, testimony is a property of perceptions, experiences and limitations – not something that we cannot directly grasp.

    1) TESTIMONIALISM

    Experience (filling your mind)

    Creativity (free association)

    Hypothesis

    Identity (property, method, relation, and category)

    Internal Consistency (logic)

    External Correspondence (experiment)

    Existential Possibility (operationalism)

    Morality (fully informed voluntary exchange free of negative externality)

    Limits (falsification)

    Parsimony

    Evolution of Truthfulness (epistemology):

    Experience,

    Free Association,

    Hypothesis,

    Theory,

    Law,

    Truth,

    Tautology

    2) PROPERTARIANISM:

    Morality: The necessity of cooperation: natural law: necessary for the construction of the voluntary organization of demand, invention, production, distribution and trade, and the formation of prices and incentives which inform our actions in the service of one another.

    The basis of natural law of voluntary cooperation and the construction of the voluntary organization of production: The Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary exchange, of property-en-toto, free of imposition of costs by externality.

    3) PROPERTY EN TOTO (Demonstrated Property)

    I. SELF-PROPERTY

    Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”

    ….a) Physical Body

    ….b) Actions and Time

    ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands.

    ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.)

    II. PERSONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over.

    III. KINSHIP PROPERTY

    ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction)

    ….b) Children (genetics)

    ….c) Familial Relations (security)

    ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility)

    ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)

    IV. COOPERATIVE PROPERTY

    ….a) Organizational ties (work)

    ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)

    V. SHAREHOLDER PROPERTY

    ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset)

    VI. COMMON PROPERTY

    ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons)

    ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.

    VII. COMMON INFORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY:

    ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.

    VIII. COMMON FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws.

    3.2) Categories of Property, Rights and Oblications:

    0) Non-Property (Bring under total control)

    ….CONTROL: Total Control

    ….PURPOSE: Create Property

    ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus.

    1) Personal (Private) Property (limited control)

    ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption

    ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio,

    ….MAYBE: Abusus

    2) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control)

    ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control

    ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation

    ….YES: Fructus

    ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio,

    ….NO: Abusus

    3) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders)

    ….CONTROL: No control.

    ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption.

    ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus,

    ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus

    4) RIGHTS

    1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation.

    2) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space.

    3) Usus – Use: setting up a stall.

    4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits)

    5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer)

    6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo.

    5) OBLIGATIONS

    1) Non-Imposition : Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto, Free of External Imposition of Costs against Property-en-toto.

    6) LAW, JUDGE AND JURY

    (obvious)Law is discovered by judges as the incremental suppression of parasitism that violates property en toto. While government may produce commons and it may construct contracts, all law must be discovered.

    7) MONARCH(JUDGE), HOUSES (MARKETS), ADVOCATES (CITIZENS)

    Decidability: Equidistribution of proceeds to houses. Economic Investment as ‘voting’. Legal Dissent prevents passage. Otherwise all legal contracts are binding.

    Houses, chosen by lot, 90 days on. 90 days off:

    7.1) Judge: The Monarchy, Judiciary

    7.2) Force: Military, Sheriffs and Militia

    7.3) Production and Property: Treasury, Finance and Banking, Entrepreneurs, Professionals, Employers of non relations.

    7.4) Reproduction, Consumption, and Insurance: Race, Nation, Tribe, Clan, Family, Individual

    The House-out-of-House.

    7.5) Gossip: Academics, Intellectuals, and media.

    – may not participate.

    – must speak truthfully (warranty)

    8) WILSONIAN SYNTHESIS: LAW, MORALITY, PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE(TRUTH TELLING)

    1) Morality: preservation of the disproportionate rewards of cooperation by a total prohibition on imposition of costs against property-en-toto.

    2) Law: an evolutionary list of the accumulated prohibitions on innovations in the means of immoral actions: impositions of costs on property en toto.

    3) Property Rights: The promise that third parties will warranty restitution and retaliation, and not retaliate for restitution and retaliation, for imposition of costs against property en toto in exchange for the same warranty from the defending party or parties.

    4) Science: the discipline(technology) of laundering imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deception from testimony, leaving only truth candidates.

    5) Philosophy: The discipline(technology) of improving truthful testimony.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 06:37:00 UTC

  • I care that you are intelligent, an aristotelian, christian, a warrior, speak th

    I care that you are intelligent, an aristotelian, christian, a warrior, speak the truth, and a friend. I do not care about the color of your skin. Just as I hope you do not care about the color of mine. Warriors are brothers all. Most of our conflict is the product of democracy in which political power can be used to obtain privilege by force of law. Otherwise, in the great war to transform the universe into eden, and man in to gods, we fight the universe as brothers in arms.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 03:48:00 UTC

  • Learn to debate honestly. Don’t play redefinition games

    Learn to debate honestly. Don’t play redefinition games.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 22:13:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291522292752384

    Reply addressees: @RiverC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291122189737984


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291122189737984

  • If you cannot speak truthfully as a man, then you are just a weak pretender. Mos

    If you cannot speak truthfully as a man, then you are just a weak pretender. Most claimants to aristocratic ethics are losers.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 22:12:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291199901749248

    Reply addressees: @RiverC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665290408008765441


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665290408008765441

  • You cannot define natural. you lie about definition of ethics. you claim power b

    You cannot define natural. you lie about definition of ethics. you claim power but show weakness. and conflate freedom with ethics.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 22:11:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665290886553694209

    Reply addressees: @RiverC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665290408008765441


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665290408008765441