Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • ¿Objetividad o Relatividad Moral?

    Original article by Curt Doolittle  / Escrito por Curt Doolittle: http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/06/17/moral-objectivity-or-relativity/ Translation by Alberto R. Zambrano U.  [L]a moralidad es tan absoluta como la matemática. Todo lo demás no es moralidad sino estrategias competitivas: variaciones contractuales sobre la moralidad objetiva. Así como toda la ley es tan absoluta como la matemática excepto las variaciones contractuales de la legislación. La fusión de la moralidad con la estrategia, y la ley con el comando es un problema de larga data en la filosofía racional. La ley y la moralidad son idénticas en contenido. La estrategia grupal y el contrato grupal son meramente utilitarios. La cooperación evolucionó tras la supervivencia individual. Para que la cooperación sea racional debe ser mutuamente beneficiosa. Para que sea mutuamente beneficiosa debe ser (en sumatoria) de esencia no parasitaria. Nosotros criamos a nuestros hijos, demostramos selección de los nuestros con afines y cooperamos con los que no son los nuestros y competimos con aquellos con los que no cooperamos. Así que: Productivos. Plenamente informados. Garantizados. Transferencia voluntaria. Libre de la exterioridad negativa de criterios similares es igual a cooperación beneficiosa La moralidad es absoluta. Las normas son meramente tácticas. La legislación no es necesariamente legal. Las normas no son necesariamente morales. Como tal, nosotros podemos medir si algunas culturas son más morales que otras, al medir el grado de supresión del parasitismo (chuleo) que es suprimido por la ley y la norma. Así que no sólo es absoluta la moralidad, sino que el contenido relativo moral de diferentes culturas es absoluto. Esa es la diferencia que determina la velocidad económica, y la velocidad económica nos garantiza gran moralidad (si la elegimos), es es el área de inquietud más grande que tenemos. salud Curt Doolittle El Instituto Propietarista Kiev, Ucrania

  • ¿Objetividad o Relatividad Moral?

    Original article by Curt Doolittle  / Escrito por Curt Doolittle: http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/06/17/moral-objectivity-or-relativity/ Translation by Alberto R. Zambrano U.  [L]a moralidad es tan absoluta como la matemática. Todo lo demás no es moralidad sino estrategias competitivas: variaciones contractuales sobre la moralidad objetiva. Así como toda la ley es tan absoluta como la matemática excepto las variaciones contractuales de la legislación. La fusión de la moralidad con la estrategia, y la ley con el comando es un problema de larga data en la filosofía racional. La ley y la moralidad son idénticas en contenido. La estrategia grupal y el contrato grupal son meramente utilitarios. La cooperación evolucionó tras la supervivencia individual. Para que la cooperación sea racional debe ser mutuamente beneficiosa. Para que sea mutuamente beneficiosa debe ser (en sumatoria) de esencia no parasitaria. Nosotros criamos a nuestros hijos, demostramos selección de los nuestros con afines y cooperamos con los que no son los nuestros y competimos con aquellos con los que no cooperamos. Así que: Productivos. Plenamente informados. Garantizados. Transferencia voluntaria. Libre de la exterioridad negativa de criterios similares es igual a cooperación beneficiosa La moralidad es absoluta. Las normas son meramente tácticas. La legislación no es necesariamente legal. Las normas no son necesariamente morales. Como tal, nosotros podemos medir si algunas culturas son más morales que otras, al medir el grado de supresión del parasitismo (chuleo) que es suprimido por la ley y la norma. Así que no sólo es absoluta la moralidad, sino que el contenido relativo moral de diferentes culturas es absoluto. Esa es la diferencia que determina la velocidad económica, y la velocidad económica nos garantiza gran moralidad (si la elegimos), es es el área de inquietud más grande que tenemos. salud Curt Doolittle El Instituto Propietarista Kiev, Ucrania

  • I DON’T DO ANTI-SEMITISM. I DO TRUTH AND RULE OF LAW. Again. Please do not go al

    I DON’T DO ANTI-SEMITISM. I DO TRUTH AND RULE OF LAW.

    Again. Please do not go all anti jewish on me. I dont do racism. it’s tedious and useless. I know how the germans failed. i know how the french failed. I know how we anglos failed. I don’t think the jews of the 19th and 20th centuries knew what they were doing any more than the Germans, French and Anglos knew what they were doing. We all work with the frames of reference we get from our cultures.

    I want to know how to accomplish the elimination of lying in the social sciences, and law, what we accomplished with the elimination of mysticism and the elimination of rationalism.

    To do that I must understand the technique. Did Plato know what he was doing? I am not sure. Did Socrates? I am not sure Did Aristotle = I think he did. Did Smith and Hume? I think they did. Did Jefferson, yes. Did Marx, I don’t think so. Did Adorno and crew? I have no idea but according to him, not really. Did Rand and Rothbard – rand maybe, rothbard I don’t think so.

    The technique of the talmud is quite simple. The question is, why does it work so well?

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 17:39:00 UTC

  • FOLLOWUP TO: THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM

    FOLLOWUP TO: THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM’S LIES

    —Dr. Dolittle, you’re an ignorant anti-semite!!—

    Actually I’m not anti-anything, and I am probably the most knowledgeable person working today on the subject of Truth, and its consequences in Ethics, Morality, and Politics. Which I’m happy to demonstrate in any debate with anyone living at any time. And I probably know the very few people capable of debating me.

    Either statements are true, statements are false or statements are undecidable. Either you can attack the arguments that I put forward or you cant. No name calling will alter the truth or falsity of the statements. All it demonstrates is that you’re either ignorant or dishonest.

    The fact of the matter is that westerners discovered quite by accident, the technology of truth and it resulted in reason, science, medicine, technology and nearly all significant advancements made by mankind.

    The fact of the matter is that for some reason, probably necessity, the hebrews created very useful means of deception of simple people who wished for the world to be other than it is. Their first great lie was scriptural monotheism. Their second great lies were pseudoscience.

    The New England neo-puritans (my people, my ancestors, since my ancestors were norman and then puritans in the plymouth and new haven colonies,) evolved into the anti-slavery movement as a way of preparing the way for women’s suffrage. This is all well documented history. Sorry. The combination of the radical changes of the industrial revolution, the anglo, french, german, and jewish enlightenment failures, and the failure of western governments to successfully adapt rule of law and political processes that provide a means of constructing commons, could not adapt.

    While a good number of our greatest minds understood that a problem was in progress they failed at solving it. Poincaré, Russell, Mises, Hayek, Popper, Bridgman, Brouwer, all failed to solve the problem of the social sciences. And because they failed, the 20th century will be remembered both as a rapid economic expansion, and (as Hayek warned it would be) a century of mysticism. Or, given their lack of understanding of the reason for the success of the discipline of science, ‘the century of pseudoscience.’.

    These are just facts. Deal with reality. We don’t need more lies. We’ve destroyed western civilization with those lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 15:28:00 UTC

  • THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM’S LIES (The

    THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM’S LIES

    (The Stoics Were Right: Jehova Is The Devil) (trigger warning) (ouch)

    The Greeks tried and only partly succeeded in creating a discipline of truth telling.

    The Hebrews succeeded in creating an training manual in deception, written using the very technique of deception that they wished to promote.

    The first great deception was monotheism: Moses restatement of Ramses’ monotheism, and Abraham’s use of Babylonian absolutism.

    The second great deception was pseudoscience: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, The Frankfurt School and Critique, Rothbard and Rand, Strauss’s neoconservatism, Chomsky.

    These techniques of deception work by the same mechanism: half truth, desirable falsehood, suggestion appealing to altruism, and loading, framing, overloading, and propagandizing by heaping undue praise on the falsehood while heaping straw man criticisms on the truth.

    It took others a few decades to identify the vulnerability. It took me a few years to understand the technique and find a means of exposing it to analytic criticism.

    But now it’s pretty clear that the ancient battle between western science and middle eastern mysticism is merely the battle between the art of truth telling and the art of lying.

    It is far more profitable to lie than speak the truth. Especially in a land where everyone speaks the truth.

    If for no other reason than it is cheaper and faster to diligently construct desirable falsehoods than unpleasant truths.

    Just as the common law evolves only in response to innovations in parasitism; just as science evolves only by the falsification of theories; so does truth telling evolve only by the incremental suppression of lying.

    This should be clear enough for an individual with a Bachelors degree in a STEM discipline to follow.

    Curt Doolittle.

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 11:22:00 UTC

  • “VOX” : LIES DAMNED LIES, AND MORE LIES (an example of failing the test of full

    “VOX” : LIES DAMNED LIES, AND MORE LIES

    (an example of failing the test of full accounting)

    It’s a race problem. The data has consistently demonstrated that it’s a race problem.

    We punish people who train their dogs because of the people who dont.

    We punish the people who have insurance because of the people who dont.

    We punish the people who produce because of the people who dont.

    We punish the people who behave well in parks becasue of the people who dont.

    We give moms in minivans going 4mph over the speed limit yet it takes 9 convictions before a car thief sees jail time, and the police do not even investigate property crime perpetrated by meth gangs.

    We punish people for tax problems yet the IRS takes no responsibility for their advice.

    We punish people in courtrooms for the crime of being too poor to take a day off from work for a procedural problem.

    We make people renew drivers licenses every four years while the rest of the world works in decades or lifetimes.

    We tax elderly out of their homes so that higher taxes can be extracted from a new generation.

    Now you want to punish the people who behave well with guns because of the people who dont.

    I can go on with this list of injustices forever.

    This issue is done. The public won’t change. We increase gun ownership every year.

    Fix the mental health problem.

    Fix the out-of-control race problem.

    Fix the injustice problem.

    Otherwise the only reason we have guns – to eliminate injustice by replacement of a corrupt government with a new one – will be the consequence.

    http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/12/4/9851102/gun-deaths-us-children

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 09:27:00 UTC

  • FULL ACCOUNTING IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT THAN I THOUGHT I have definitely underest

    FULL ACCOUNTING IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT THAN I THOUGHT

    I have definitely underestimated the importance of the the principle of the “Warranty of Full Accounting”. Its so damned obvious in retrospect. But it is VERY hard to pull a fast one if you are required to give a full accounting of any principle. This is much better than popper’s incomplete ‘falsification’. Followers of Popper ‘get’ that something is very right with falsification but none have reduced it the the set of dimensional warranties that I have. The virtue of thinking like a programmer in operations balancing accounts rather than a philosopher using analogies, or a logician using equality of ratios.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 09:05:00 UTC

  • We couldn’t innovate the technology of truth fast enough to compensate for the r

    We couldn’t innovate the technology of truth fast enough to compensate for the rate at which they innovated lying. Again, just as they distributed the first great lie throughout Rome on the backs of women and slaves, they did the same in the 19th and 20th century through women and slaves.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 08:36:00 UTC

  • IF WE TEACH 100 PEOPLE HOW TO DISMANTLE THE THE LIES AND RESTATE IT AS TRUTH WE

    IF WE TEACH 100 PEOPLE HOW TO DISMANTLE THE THE LIES AND RESTATE IT AS TRUTH WE WILL CHANGE MANKIND FOREVER.

    That’s our first objective. To get 100. To get that 100 I need to show how they lie, show formulaically how they lie, show formulaically how to restate lies truthfully.

    We can transform social science, morality, law, and politics just as much as we have changed the world from mysticism to science.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 08:34:00 UTC

  • THIS ACADEMIC I ran across him because of an article today. He’s working on simi

    https://sites.google.com/site/davidhughjones/WATCH THIS ACADEMIC

    I ran across him because of an article today. He’s working on similar issues in economics: the value of honesty.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 06:55:00 UTC