Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • “What benefit is there, in protecting liars from retaliation, if they can be sho

    —“What benefit is there, in protecting liars from retaliation, if they can be shown to be liars? Why do you want to protect liars, unless you should be one yourself?”— Eli Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-09 03:41:00 UTC

  • Edward Fürst 1 – Excellent demonstration of Pilpul. 2 – Excellent use of straw m

    Edward Fürst

    1 – Excellent demonstration of Pilpul.

    2 – Excellent use of straw man.

    3 – Excellent use of argument from ignorance.

    4 – Excellent user of black or white fallacy

    5 – Excellent use of shaming.

    6 – Excellent use of using all of the above to construct overloading.

    7 – Excellent use of creating a high cost of defense.

    In other words, an excellent use of Pilpul. Which is your usual argumentative technique: to raise the cost of refutation not to seek understanding, and not to refute but to make truthful discourse impossible. To demonstrate that you are in fact one of the liars we seek to prevent from lying.

    Now that we have established the method by which you conduct your intuitionistic attempt to pollute the commons, we can address your deceit point by point.

    ON DEFINITIONS OF IMPULSIVITY

    The article you site does not test impulsivity but aggression. Aggression may be the result of impulsiveness or reason, but the willingness to bear costs and risks in order to obtain returns does exist in a spectrum with men taking greater risks and women fewer risks. Hence why men are more expendable and why we are born in slightly greater numbers.

    So the question is instead why we would not prosecute the authors for conflating impulse with aggression since while aggression may be impulsive, men and women are equally impulsive but unequally aggressive.

    In fact, women have a much harder time managing their impulsive emotions. And they need to. Because the cost of caring for offspring is non-rational. SO women must be incentivized by nature non-rationally. They risk less but work more. We work less but risk more. We generally describe the differences as women play the role of gatherer-tortoise and men the role of hunter-hare. But this is just a necessary division of labor.

    ON LEGALITY OF TRUTH

    1) the scientific method consists not of a method but a set of criteria for eliminating falsehood.

    2) science requires operational language, parsimony, limits and full accounting. It does not require objective morality. Law does (mostly) require it. Science is extremely good at policing itself. (science proper does not take social science seriously).

    3) the law already includes many tests of sufficiency. If we can provide tests of sufficiency the law can treat them as any other list of sufficiency – particularly in moral matters (involuntary transfer). We must give the law tests of sufficiency. Which is what I have done with truth: warranties of sufficiency of due diligence in various dimensions.

    4) If one communicates poorly that is very different from one advocating theft directly or indirectly. If one errs one can recant, and issue correction. If one cannot issue correction one can pay compensation. But in any case, in order to end up in court, one must provide another with the incentive to bring him to court, and the likelihood that such a person would prevail before a jury of one’s peers.

    5) If we can teach reading, arithmetic, mathematics, and various other skills. And if we can have taught Grammar(organizing), Logic(processing) and Rhetoric(outputting), and if we can teach formal logic then we can certainly teach truthfulness. If we can write software we can write strictly constructed law.

    6) It is a cost. The increase in the degree of suppression of parasitism is always a cost. But what was the cost of the failure of the last century to suppress the jewish art of lying in all fields (Pseudoscience) as a successor to the jewish art of lying in all fields in the ancient era (monotheistic scripturalism). And the cost of suppressing german philosophical discourse, or american postmodernism, or the innumeracy of keynesian economics? All costs are opportunity costs.

    7) Juries are exceptionally successful at stepping into the shoes of criminals. The evidence is (and there is a lot of it) that juries are exceptionally good at their job except in the most abstract of cases. Lying is not so difficult a problem to overcome.

    8) Courts already seek to identify a deception. Law is only a question if no deceptions can be found. Very few cases go to court because this is determined prior to jury.

    9) The mild randomness of the jury is an incentive to reconcile disputes prior to court.

    10) that judges do not specialize is the first problem. That lawyers cannot be prosecuted for falsehoods is the second. That we insufficiently select juries from peers is the third

    11) Producers of all goods and services must provide warranties of sufficiency and show due diligence against the externalization of harm (costs). Where political speech can produce the greatest harm of all, there is no reason not to require it be truthfully constructed.

    12) Legislation and law can be strictly constructed by the same criteria as tests of truth and this prohibits the ‘interpretation’ of the law and restores the constitution that would force the courts to return decisions to the legislature if the questions are not in fact questions of truth or law. This was the original intent of the framers, who in retrospect we can see were trying to construct a formal logic but were still to christian to do so.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-09 03:31:00 UTC

  • Very important piece for those with intellectual bent. #libertarian #conservativ

    Very important piece for those with intellectual bent.
    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/03/08/the-athenian-art-of-truth-vs-jerusalems-art-of-lying/ #libertarian #conservative #altright #nrx #propertarianism

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 20:45:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707306192566161409

  • You cannot create the superman any more than you can create truth. What we can d

    You cannot create the superman any more than you can create truth. What we can do is eliminate falsehood, and and eliminate the bad men, leaving only candidates for truth and candidates for good men remaining. This is enough and it is all we can know. We domesticated everything on earth including ourselves. And we know now that the prosperity of a civilization is not determined by it’s geniuses, but by the absence of its fools. We must eliminate the bad. That is enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 15:59:00 UTC

  • The Disciplines We Teach Frame Our Generations

    Of all the skills we can be taught the Trivium is the most important. It is the art of testimony – of teaching all children to judge the truth or falsehood of statements. Why would you no longer teach Grammar, Logic, and Rhetoric? Unless you wanted children to lie? The Trivium Gives Us Skills in Truth Telling (Not my definitions) 1) Grammar teaches the mechanics of language to the student. This is the step where the student “comes to terms”, i.e. defining the objects and information perceived by the five senses. Hence, the Law of Identity: a tree is a tree, and not a cat. 2) Logic (also dialectic) is the “mechanics” of thought and of analysis; the process of identifying fallacious arguments and statements, and so systematically removing contradictions, thereby producing factual knowledge that can be trusted. NOTE: I would replace logic with ‘testimony’. 3) Rhetoric is the application of language in order to instruct and to persuade the listener and the reader. It is the knowledge (grammar) now understood (logic) being transmitted outwards, as wisdom (rhetoric). The Quadrivium gives us Application of truth telling which is absent morality and cooperation arithmetic – accounts geometry – Spaces and distances. astronomy – Physics music – composition (Aesthetics) Note that these are all statements of measurement Philosophy and Theology ended one’s education. You can also lie in philosophy simply by choosing the standard in-group categories rather than the full set of categories. If you start with this list: Metaphysics, Epistemology, Ethics, Politics, Aesthetics. You will produce very different conclusions from this list: Existence (physics) Metaphysics (actionability) Biology (reproductive strategy) Psychology (biases and limits) Family (organization of reproduction) Epistemology and Truth (Testimony) Ethics (Logic of Cooperation) Sociology (Organization of Production) Politics and Institutions (Organization of production of commons) Group Evolutionary Strategy Warfare Economics Science and Technology. Religion and Mythology History and Aesthetics Education. Why would you write Dr Seuss instead of using our Fairy tales? The socialists lied to our people, taught our people to lie, and ended their education in defense against lying.

  • The Disciplines We Teach Frame Our Generations

    Of all the skills we can be taught the Trivium is the most important. It is the art of testimony – of teaching all children to judge the truth or falsehood of statements. Why would you no longer teach Grammar, Logic, and Rhetoric? Unless you wanted children to lie? The Trivium Gives Us Skills in Truth Telling (Not my definitions) 1) Grammar teaches the mechanics of language to the student. This is the step where the student “comes to terms”, i.e. defining the objects and information perceived by the five senses. Hence, the Law of Identity: a tree is a tree, and not a cat. 2) Logic (also dialectic) is the “mechanics” of thought and of analysis; the process of identifying fallacious arguments and statements, and so systematically removing contradictions, thereby producing factual knowledge that can be trusted. NOTE: I would replace logic with ‘testimony’. 3) Rhetoric is the application of language in order to instruct and to persuade the listener and the reader. It is the knowledge (grammar) now understood (logic) being transmitted outwards, as wisdom (rhetoric). The Quadrivium gives us Application of truth telling which is absent morality and cooperation arithmetic – accounts geometry – Spaces and distances. astronomy – Physics music – composition (Aesthetics) Note that these are all statements of measurement Philosophy and Theology ended one’s education. You can also lie in philosophy simply by choosing the standard in-group categories rather than the full set of categories. If you start with this list: Metaphysics, Epistemology, Ethics, Politics, Aesthetics. You will produce very different conclusions from this list: Existence (physics) Metaphysics (actionability) Biology (reproductive strategy) Psychology (biases and limits) Family (organization of reproduction) Epistemology and Truth (Testimony) Ethics (Logic of Cooperation) Sociology (Organization of Production) Politics and Institutions (Organization of production of commons) Group Evolutionary Strategy Warfare Economics Science and Technology. Religion and Mythology History and Aesthetics Education. Why would you write Dr Seuss instead of using our Fairy tales? The socialists lied to our people, taught our people to lie, and ended their education in defense against lying.

  • We Gave Them The Choice. They Chose Poorly. But We Are Morally Free.

    [W]e gave our own women a choice. We have the rest of the world a choice. They chose poorly. The experiment failed. We can morally abandon hope. We can return to evidence. We can exchange but not convert. We can cooperate but not advance. We can use high trust internally but pragmatism with others. We can act morally but not optimistically.

  • We Gave Them The Choice. They Chose Poorly. But We Are Morally Free.

    [W]e gave our own women a choice. We have the rest of the world a choice. They chose poorly. The experiment failed. We can morally abandon hope. We can return to evidence. We can exchange but not convert. We can cooperate but not advance. We can use high trust internally but pragmatism with others. We can act morally but not optimistically.

  • The Athenian Art of Truth vs Jerusalem’s Art of Lying

    (VERY IMPORTANT PIECE) (h/t: eli harman) [P]ilpul is a craft. It is ‘the art of lying’. It is one of the oldest written arts. The art of justifying anything. The art of loading, framing, overloading, and suggestion. The art of constructing loaded relations in the mind so that a justification for for a desired action can be found. It’s the art of overwhelming the human mind with the stimulation of language so that the stimulations of experience cannot compete. Because while searching to understand one is open to suggestion – to inception – to deceit. It is the source of the last century’s transformation of western law from a descriptive science that prohibits involuntary transfers, and preserves the peace, to a system of moral justification by which people can be brought into political conflict so that political power can be obtained by force of government. Marx’s “Dialectical Materialism” is just an application of Pilpul. The vast expansion of pseudoscience during the 19th and 20th has been achieved through the use of the technique whereby it is possible to justify anything if you seek justification of it through ‘meaning’ rather than seek correspondence to existence using internally consistent and externally correspondent language. In the west we use the opposite technique: existential operations. We did so because of the the Roman conversion of greek platonism to empirical law. Because if you want to justify something using ‘meaning’ rather than existential operations, you can find or create that justification. This is the meaning of hermeneutic interpretation. The study of texts and language in order to assist you in free association by which you can justify anything is in accord with that text. And this is why strict construction and operational language, identity and non conflation, external correspondence and internal consistency, full accounting, parsimony and limits, and objective morality are required of us if we are to speak truthfully and cause no harm to others by untruthful speech. Westerners invented truth and we speak the truth. We are so indoctrinated into seeking to understand one another, and so habituated trust in one another, that we have forgotten how how to detect lies. Our empathy, our trust, are exactly what is needed for the naive training of – deceit of – our minds through suggestion. We have stopped teaching logic and rhetoric so that the left could spread lies. But even in teaching logic and rhetoric we taught rhetorical fallacies of construction. We did not teach how to counter lies of loading, framing, overloading and suggestion. Nor did we teach (or know) our cognitive biases – which are now the central canon of psychological study, or our genetic biases – which must become part of that canon. Even in our rhetoric we assume the others merely err, not that they intentionally lie, seek justification, and deceive. We have been trusting for so many thousands of years that we do not know the art of lying. We hare become naive in our trust. Pilpul is the training that educated the great deceits of Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, [even some of Popper], Rothbard, and the Frankfurt School: (Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Pollock, Fromm, Kirchheimer, Löwenthal, Neumann ,Grossman). Christianity and Kantian rationalism are the training that was provided to the great continental liars that still persist in both the german rationalist, and american postmodern traditions. The originators and the propagators do not really know they lie any more than women who engage in ever-present never-escapable, but often unimaginable female wishful thinking know they lie. But if enough people go along with the lie, it is as good enough for them as it is if we discover some fundamental truth and spread it. It is the technique by which academics, jews, and women have used their weakness to create a new religion as mystical and deadly as the last that sent us into a dark age for a thousand years, from which we emerged over the next thousand through the the use of truth under the name we surreptitiously called ‘science’ in order to not accuse the church and academy and state of lying. Science is the discipline by which we practice the art of speaking truthfully. That we had to call it something other than truthful speech is an indictment of all the rest of society by the few who practice truthful speech. Reason, reasonableness and science (and not philosophical rationalism) have been attempts to create a specialization in truth telling without threatening the religious moral and legal leaders. Our law was converted from an empirical science to a religo-moral form of jewish mysticism over the course of the twentieth century by constant use of the PilPul tradition. Law identifies and lists the methods by which we humans prey upon one another, and prohibits them going forward. Law is a purely empirical study. But the talmud is not a vehicle for science of truth telling. The indo european anglo saxon law is such a vehicle. The talmud is not empirical it is justificationary. It is an instruction manual for lying. And pilpul is the technique by which one learns to lie. The ancient battle between Athens and Jerusalem is one between science and truth, and justification and deceit. And governments are pragmatic. They will use truth or lie as it suits them. Notice how rationalism in philosophy and legal relativism have evolved in tandem. Philosophy has been used to lie as much as it has ben used to tell the truth. Legislation is not law, unless it is also legal. Legislation consists of some combination of law(science of prohibition of parasitism), contract (exchange between parties), and Command (export of costs), and predation (bureaucratic parasitism). But law is a very simple thing: an empirically accumulated record of the methods of parasitic action, and the methods of restitution for having committed them. The only western philosophy needed is and has ever been our common law. The rest of it is an attempt to gain power, or an attempt to justify the separation of truth seeking in the form of science, from the discipline of lying in its many forms – particularly religio-moral forms. We are in this position because only Darwin and Einstein fully succeeded in their disciplines. Spencer failed in philosophy because he was not co-temporal with Popper’s falsification. Popper failed in epistemology – an irony for the ages. Mises, Hayek failed in economics. Brouwer failed in math. Bridgman in Science. All our sages failed in law – first because western law is practiced as a cult of the law, rather than as a science of the prohibitions of involuntary transfer. And Tesla and Turing and programming came to late to instruct all of the above in the solution of strict construction and operational language by limit of discourse to existential terminology. It has fallen to my generation to stand on the shoulders of great men and look back at their failings and to understand why it is that they failed, and how to restore truth to our discourse. When we encountered the enlightenment era we had to solve the problem of cooperating at scale – with different people from different nations. But all our moral discourse for intertribal and international cooperation was constructed out of myth and mysticism. We had to invent economics. Not as ‘truth’ but as a separate discipline in order not to offend our elites. Just as we had to invent science and reason as separate disciplines as not to offend our elites. We have spend millennia trying not to offend our elites – who rule by lie. To solve this problem forever, we have to punish our elites for their use of anything other than truth. We humans can organize around truth, morality, and correspondence, or we can organize around falsehood, immorality, and non-correspondence. By constructing these great deceits, the jewish enlightenment caused tremendous damage to western civilization. Although ALL the enlightenments did so. Look at what France has become? Look at what england is becoming. Look at all of europe. The lie of Rousseuaian France. The lie of Kantian rationalism. The lie of british aristocracy of everyone. The lie of the free ride of Keynesian Economics – that we can increase employment without consuming all other forms of national capital in the process. That between keynesian pseudoscience and jewish pseudoscience, our civilization had been destroyed, and we have been brought to near extinction. What is the difference between the immediacy of a gas chamber and the slow process of extermination by a new process of conversion and gradual suicide? What is the difference between gradual suicide and immediate displacement through immigration of non-kin and competitors? If we give the Chinese heroin and ruin their civilization and they kick us out forever, they are right. If we give teh lie of the good of democracy instead of the truth of the common law and science to others, they are right to reject us. If the jews and germans, and french and anglo enlightenment thinkers give us intellectual heroin and we like it very much – hyper-consumption is a naturally occurring heroin for humans – and it produces the exact same effect as heroin over longer periods. It overwhelms our reason. Hyper consumption of our genetic, territorial, physical, traditional, cultural, normative, capital, has been stimulating just as heroin is stimulating. But neither is an objective good. I think we forget that jewish verbalism and female verbalism have the same cause. That jewish argument and female argument have the same cause. That jewish group evolutionary strategy and female group evolutionary strategy are identical: to gossip, rally, shame and frame through repetition, to in order to survive no matter which group of males are in charge of them. Women act as such. Jews act as such. Jewish women are more masculine, and jewish men more feminine than competing orders. Conversely, western people absolutely LOVE to protect the weak as a sign of status. We love to demonstrate our masculine superiority by hosting more of the weak. Yet we merely invite those who conspire against us. The female encourages consumption to increase her rate of reproduction. That is her strategy. It has no mind or reason. Man herds. He manages his herd. He manages his territory. He manages the balance of each. He fights competitors. He expands his territory. In doing so he captures the genes that let him do so. END THE LIES. NOT JUST OF THE JEWS BUT OF ALL ENLIGHTENMENT THINKERS. Return the west by returning us to our martial foundations: Truth, Reason, Science, Testimony, Jury, Common Law, Rule of law, Universal standing, Natural Law necessary for rational voluntary cooperation. TRUTH IS ENOUGH. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilpul

  • The Athenian Art of Truth vs Jerusalem’s Art of Lying

    (VERY IMPORTANT PIECE) (h/t: eli harman) [P]ilpul is a craft. It is ‘the art of lying’. It is one of the oldest written arts. The art of justifying anything. The art of loading, framing, overloading, and suggestion. The art of constructing loaded relations in the mind so that a justification for for a desired action can be found. It’s the art of overwhelming the human mind with the stimulation of language so that the stimulations of experience cannot compete. Because while searching to understand one is open to suggestion – to inception – to deceit. It is the source of the last century’s transformation of western law from a descriptive science that prohibits involuntary transfers, and preserves the peace, to a system of moral justification by which people can be brought into political conflict so that political power can be obtained by force of government. Marx’s “Dialectical Materialism” is just an application of Pilpul. The vast expansion of pseudoscience during the 19th and 20th has been achieved through the use of the technique whereby it is possible to justify anything if you seek justification of it through ‘meaning’ rather than seek correspondence to existence using internally consistent and externally correspondent language. In the west we use the opposite technique: existential operations. We did so because of the the Roman conversion of greek platonism to empirical law. Because if you want to justify something using ‘meaning’ rather than existential operations, you can find or create that justification. This is the meaning of hermeneutic interpretation. The study of texts and language in order to assist you in free association by which you can justify anything is in accord with that text. And this is why strict construction and operational language, identity and non conflation, external correspondence and internal consistency, full accounting, parsimony and limits, and objective morality are required of us if we are to speak truthfully and cause no harm to others by untruthful speech. Westerners invented truth and we speak the truth. We are so indoctrinated into seeking to understand one another, and so habituated trust in one another, that we have forgotten how how to detect lies. Our empathy, our trust, are exactly what is needed for the naive training of – deceit of – our minds through suggestion. We have stopped teaching logic and rhetoric so that the left could spread lies. But even in teaching logic and rhetoric we taught rhetorical fallacies of construction. We did not teach how to counter lies of loading, framing, overloading and suggestion. Nor did we teach (or know) our cognitive biases – which are now the central canon of psychological study, or our genetic biases – which must become part of that canon. Even in our rhetoric we assume the others merely err, not that they intentionally lie, seek justification, and deceive. We have been trusting for so many thousands of years that we do not know the art of lying. We hare become naive in our trust. Pilpul is the training that educated the great deceits of Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, [even some of Popper], Rothbard, and the Frankfurt School: (Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Pollock, Fromm, Kirchheimer, Löwenthal, Neumann ,Grossman). Christianity and Kantian rationalism are the training that was provided to the great continental liars that still persist in both the german rationalist, and american postmodern traditions. The originators and the propagators do not really know they lie any more than women who engage in ever-present never-escapable, but often unimaginable female wishful thinking know they lie. But if enough people go along with the lie, it is as good enough for them as it is if we discover some fundamental truth and spread it. It is the technique by which academics, jews, and women have used their weakness to create a new religion as mystical and deadly as the last that sent us into a dark age for a thousand years, from which we emerged over the next thousand through the the use of truth under the name we surreptitiously called ‘science’ in order to not accuse the church and academy and state of lying. Science is the discipline by which we practice the art of speaking truthfully. That we had to call it something other than truthful speech is an indictment of all the rest of society by the few who practice truthful speech. Reason, reasonableness and science (and not philosophical rationalism) have been attempts to create a specialization in truth telling without threatening the religious moral and legal leaders. Our law was converted from an empirical science to a religo-moral form of jewish mysticism over the course of the twentieth century by constant use of the PilPul tradition. Law identifies and lists the methods by which we humans prey upon one another, and prohibits them going forward. Law is a purely empirical study. But the talmud is not a vehicle for science of truth telling. The indo european anglo saxon law is such a vehicle. The talmud is not empirical it is justificationary. It is an instruction manual for lying. And pilpul is the technique by which one learns to lie. The ancient battle between Athens and Jerusalem is one between science and truth, and justification and deceit. And governments are pragmatic. They will use truth or lie as it suits them. Notice how rationalism in philosophy and legal relativism have evolved in tandem. Philosophy has been used to lie as much as it has ben used to tell the truth. Legislation is not law, unless it is also legal. Legislation consists of some combination of law(science of prohibition of parasitism), contract (exchange between parties), and Command (export of costs), and predation (bureaucratic parasitism). But law is a very simple thing: an empirically accumulated record of the methods of parasitic action, and the methods of restitution for having committed them. The only western philosophy needed is and has ever been our common law. The rest of it is an attempt to gain power, or an attempt to justify the separation of truth seeking in the form of science, from the discipline of lying in its many forms – particularly religio-moral forms. We are in this position because only Darwin and Einstein fully succeeded in their disciplines. Spencer failed in philosophy because he was not co-temporal with Popper’s falsification. Popper failed in epistemology – an irony for the ages. Mises, Hayek failed in economics. Brouwer failed in math. Bridgman in Science. All our sages failed in law – first because western law is practiced as a cult of the law, rather than as a science of the prohibitions of involuntary transfer. And Tesla and Turing and programming came to late to instruct all of the above in the solution of strict construction and operational language by limit of discourse to existential terminology. It has fallen to my generation to stand on the shoulders of great men and look back at their failings and to understand why it is that they failed, and how to restore truth to our discourse. When we encountered the enlightenment era we had to solve the problem of cooperating at scale – with different people from different nations. But all our moral discourse for intertribal and international cooperation was constructed out of myth and mysticism. We had to invent economics. Not as ‘truth’ but as a separate discipline in order not to offend our elites. Just as we had to invent science and reason as separate disciplines as not to offend our elites. We have spend millennia trying not to offend our elites – who rule by lie. To solve this problem forever, we have to punish our elites for their use of anything other than truth. We humans can organize around truth, morality, and correspondence, or we can organize around falsehood, immorality, and non-correspondence. By constructing these great deceits, the jewish enlightenment caused tremendous damage to western civilization. Although ALL the enlightenments did so. Look at what France has become? Look at what england is becoming. Look at all of europe. The lie of Rousseuaian France. The lie of Kantian rationalism. The lie of british aristocracy of everyone. The lie of the free ride of Keynesian Economics – that we can increase employment without consuming all other forms of national capital in the process. That between keynesian pseudoscience and jewish pseudoscience, our civilization had been destroyed, and we have been brought to near extinction. What is the difference between the immediacy of a gas chamber and the slow process of extermination by a new process of conversion and gradual suicide? What is the difference between gradual suicide and immediate displacement through immigration of non-kin and competitors? If we give the Chinese heroin and ruin their civilization and they kick us out forever, they are right. If we give teh lie of the good of democracy instead of the truth of the common law and science to others, they are right to reject us. If the jews and germans, and french and anglo enlightenment thinkers give us intellectual heroin and we like it very much – hyper-consumption is a naturally occurring heroin for humans – and it produces the exact same effect as heroin over longer periods. It overwhelms our reason. Hyper consumption of our genetic, territorial, physical, traditional, cultural, normative, capital, has been stimulating just as heroin is stimulating. But neither is an objective good. I think we forget that jewish verbalism and female verbalism have the same cause. That jewish argument and female argument have the same cause. That jewish group evolutionary strategy and female group evolutionary strategy are identical: to gossip, rally, shame and frame through repetition, to in order to survive no matter which group of males are in charge of them. Women act as such. Jews act as such. Jewish women are more masculine, and jewish men more feminine than competing orders. Conversely, western people absolutely LOVE to protect the weak as a sign of status. We love to demonstrate our masculine superiority by hosting more of the weak. Yet we merely invite those who conspire against us. The female encourages consumption to increase her rate of reproduction. That is her strategy. It has no mind or reason. Man herds. He manages his herd. He manages his territory. He manages the balance of each. He fights competitors. He expands his territory. In doing so he captures the genes that let him do so. END THE LIES. NOT JUST OF THE JEWS BUT OF ALL ENLIGHTENMENT THINKERS. Return the west by returning us to our martial foundations: Truth, Reason, Science, Testimony, Jury, Common Law, Rule of law, Universal standing, Natural Law necessary for rational voluntary cooperation. TRUTH IS ENOUGH. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilpul