You know, I”m not into this whole nazi thing. OK?
I’m not into the racism thing.
Everyone fucked up.
I just wanna fix it.
Truth is enough.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 11:59:00 UTC
You know, I”m not into this whole nazi thing. OK?
I’m not into the racism thing.
Everyone fucked up.
I just wanna fix it.
Truth is enough.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 11:59:00 UTC
HOW KNOWLEDGE IMPROVES
—“sometimes what works satisfyingly for a time is subsequently found replaceable by something that works even better — for example, the discovery that Newtonian mechanics is a special case of relativistic mechanics that holds exactly only in the limit of v approaching zero, but is “good enough”— Frank Lovell
Newtonian mechanics is a special case of relativistic mechanics where v approaches zero.
This does not mean newtonian mechanics are false.
As far as I can tell this tends, more often than not, by far, to be the method by which knowledge evolves. And I very much like Frank’s terminology here since it avoids the fallacy of treating knowledge (actions that produce desired outcomes) and logic (internally true or false) as bound by the same criteria. THEY ARE NOT.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 06:21:00 UTC
Moral language is a failure because they convinced useful idiots that morality was subjective. Financial and economic language defeats them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:31:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716166047456501762
Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Keynes, Rothbard, Strauss. The old right failed to crush pseudoscience. Truth crushes pseudoscience. TRUTH
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:27:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716165179373985792
Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Keynes, Rothbard, Strauss. They failed to crush pseudoscience. Truth crushes pseudoscience.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:27:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716165061555961856
Reply addressees: @DJTWMAR
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716164413833633796
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716164413833633796
Our Generation’s Red Queen, is that genetic differences matter, and the data is incontrovertible. We must reverse the tide. No more lies.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:25:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716164517026250752
Why are we the #NewRight? Because we earned it. The West rose because we invented Testimony. We tell the truth. The Old Right didn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:23:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716164049088684032
Why are we the #NewRight? Because we rely on science, evidence, demonstrated preference – not wishful thinking. Empiricism = Conservatism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:19:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/716163208017481728
WE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO IGNORANCE AND MYSTICISM IN THE COMMONS
Why do we have the right to ignorance and mysticism (in the commons)?
–“…the question is unanswerable…”–
Quite the opposite. The question is answerable either way.
That one cannot have a right to impose costs upon others.
You can hold any falsehood you want, any immorality you want, as long as its in your head. But once you bring it into the commons then you are forcing a cost upon others.
So,
why does one have the right o act mystically?
why does one have the right to act ignorantly?
why does one have the right to act immorally?
why does one have the right to act unethically?
why does one have the right to act criminally?
why does one have the right to act malignantly? (evil)
You see, when you place ideas on a spectrum of similar ideas it becomes clearer that ignorance, and mysticism are merely increasingly indirect means of exporting costs upon others: another form of crime.
In the past we have been tolerant of every form of malignant, criminal, unethical, immoral, ignorant, and mystical behaviors.
But we have incrementally suppressed each form of crime over the generations and it is this suppression of crimes of imposition that have created our ‘domestication of man’. Our prosperity is the result of eliminating criminality as much as eliminating error.
So again, why does one have the right to ignorance and mysticism any more than the right to immoral, unethical, criminal, and malignant behavior?
One only possesses that right if others reciprocally grant it.
That is the origin of all rights: reciprocal insurance.
Why do we suppress imposition of costs? to force people into beneficial behavior rather than parasitic behavior. And ignorance and mysticism are a cost, and truth and spiritualism are not.
There is nothing unscientific about spirituality any more than there is anything unscientific about the experience of seeing color in visible light.
Mysticism is a drug. Ignorance is a form of free riding.
Drugs are fine in your home. Ignorance is fine in your home.
Don’t do drugs in public. Don’t speak ignorance in public.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 04:28:00 UTC
Moral language is a failure because they convinced useful idiots that morality was subjective. Financial and economic language defeats them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 03:31:00 UTC