@Mises The wyrm has turned. We have our success. Why cling to falsehoods out of personal allegiance to mentors? We must surpass them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:14:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767001915959848960
@Mises The wyrm has turned. We have our success. Why cling to falsehoods out of personal allegiance to mentors? We must surpass them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:14:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767001915959848960
@mises We should be teaching that we finally solved the 2500 year-old problem,not trying to use Jewish Critique to prop up our past failures
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:12:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767001420889329665
It’s not like we understood that the source of liberty was Truth (or what we call ‘science’ today.) We just thought Truth was a virtue.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 13:40:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766993220152598528
A social pseudoscientist seeks an optimum compromise of his preference. A social scientist seeks to clarify terms so that people choose wisely, and trade wiseley.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 12:51:00 UTC
Well, you just CONFUSE my speaking the truth with that I have anti-anyone sentiments. I don’t. We can cooperate better if we rely on truth.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 12:50:00 UTC
Either a proposition survives criticism and remains a truth candidate, or it does not and is false.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 10:48:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766950122517204993
Reply addressees: @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949726449131521
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949726449131521
Who speaks the truth, and the reason he speaks the truth, bear no influence upon truth or falsehood.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 10:48:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949983849287680
Reply addressees: @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949726449131521
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949726449131521
Does it matter who says? Or does it matter if it survives all tests of superior argument?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 10:46:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949592554278912
Reply addressees: @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949017997615104
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766949017997615104
It’s not like we understood that the source of liberty was Truth (or what we call ‘science’ today.) We just thought Truth was a virtue.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 09:40:00 UTC
To restore liberty to its origins as social science, I must falsify the competing fallacies. The Jewish model always fails. Our model wins.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 09:38:00 UTC