Theme: Truth

  • First, I am sure I (as well as any observer) understand that you’re admitting de

    First, I am sure I (as well as any observer) understand that you’re admitting defeat on truth, and switching, to avoid it…


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 18:17:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768150299374718976

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768114061615570946


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768114061615570946

  • THE SPECTRUM OF SIGNALS OF BELIEF CLAIMS. We’ve been discussing this in my corne

    THE SPECTRUM OF SIGNALS OF BELIEF CLAIMS.

    We’ve been discussing this in my corner of the universe, and I tend to work with the following terminological sequence:

    Faith = recognition that you’re position is indefensible, but you report that you hold some position.

    Belief = a ‘signal’ in the report that you might decide in favor of the position were it of no cost to you, but that you aren’t accountable for the truth or falsehood of it.

    Know = that you are not signaling, but with present knowledge, will defend your claim that you will decide in favor of the position, even if it costs you minor reputation for defending it.

    Promise = that you are willing to commit status and reputation to defend the assertion that you will choose in favor of the position.

    Warranty = that you are willing to commit materially to defend the assertion that you will choose in favor of the position.

    Demonstrate = that you have chosen in favor of the position.

    We have a lot of evidence that says this hierarchy of costs reflects the ‘put’ that an individual is making on the proposition at hand.

    TYING TO EARLIER POST ON THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY as reducible to word games that attempt to escape accountability.

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154464857972264

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:26:00 UTC

  • Here, I’ll match your link and raise you a deck. 😉

    Here, I’ll match your link and raise you a deck. 😉 http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:14:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768073858641428484

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768051879062347778


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768051879062347778

  • OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM’S MAIN THEMES Quick Note Turned into a Post. If you

    OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM’S MAIN THEMES

    Quick Note Turned into a Post.

    If you watch (1) the intertemporal division of perception, (2) the intercultural division of perception (circumpolar people), and (3) listen to this podcast (civilizational strategies);

    And if you catch that consistently across the personal, interpersonal, national, and civilizational strategies, that I CONSISTENTLY try to draw your attention to the three possible means of governance (coercion): religion/gossp/ostracization, trade/remuneration, and law/order/violence, you will begin to see the pattern that I work with that is VERY DIFFERENT from the idealism of ‘equality’ or even near equality.

    And if you then grasp that all human intuition, mind, emotion, reason, exists for the simple purpose of acquisition. And our intuitions vary only be reproductive strategy(gender) and our desirability(class). And that our emotional reward system is nothing more than evidence of changes in the state of property.

    And that we act to acquire property in toto.

    And that we negotiate for acquiring what we desire to fulfill our strategy.

    And that we signal by a thousand means in order to improve our negotiating position.

    And if you are enough of a philosopher to grasp that I divide categories of argument into the equivalent of increasingly articulate mathematical disciplines. (see my hierarchies of argument) – and we use them to honestly, dishonestly, wishfully, foolishly, and rarely truthfully, use them to negotiate with one another.

    And if you then you bring in the various dimensions by which I ask we test propositions (testimonialism’s six dimensional tests of due diligence necessary for warranty of propositions),

    And that the only way we make use of information across all our perceptions, is when we cooperate (Trade) voluntarily.

    And then that we can ‘calculate’ together fastest, most competitively, if we make use of (1)natural, judge-discovered, common law, jury, (2) a market for reproduction (marriage and family), (3) a market for the production of good and services in support of the market for reproduction, (4) and a market for the production of commons.

    And that we have domesticated mankind through incremental suppression of parasitism thereby enforcing production. And that we have only now to expand our suppression of parasitism to counter the development of media, so that we prevent propaganda and deceit in every walk of life.

    Then you have social science as I describe it in Propertarianism. (Natural Law), and the solutions to the majority of current problems.

    Stop lying, stop parasitism, and stop involuntary association, and that’s what it takes.

    My next series of thought will be criticisms of the attempt to preserve the monopoly of territory on the continent by the federal government.

    And I will continue to work on religion while I do that.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:12:00 UTC

  • well this is the point, you are claiming authority where you have none, and I am

    well this is the point, you are claiming authority where you have none, and I am doubting you rather than allowing deception.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:35:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768064107643895808

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768063915536199681


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768063915536199681

  • It doesn’t matter how many people believe something, or what norm demonstrated,

    It doesn’t matter how many people believe something, or what norm demonstrated, only what’s not false and possibly true.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:26:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768061904736624641

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059858650173441


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059858650173441

  • You mean you declared the tautology, right?

    You mean you declared the tautology, right?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:25:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768061584702861313

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059858650173441


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059858650173441

  • If we have accurate language we create create fewer errors in analysiss and comm

    If we have accurate language we create create fewer errors in analysiss and communication.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:18:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059879206612992

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257

  • You speak the truth. The symbols you’ve written are a tautology, not even a proo

    You speak the truth. The symbols you’ve written are a tautology, not even a proof. You just conflate terms w/o understanding.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:17:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059581658521600

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257

  • This statement says: “I promise if you add 1 and 1 you will produce two.” I read

    This statement says: “I promise if you add 1 and 1 you will produce two.” I read your promise and I agree you speak the truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:16:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059325088665608

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257