(Ethelbert, Jesus, and Kant say the same thing) The languages of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.
Theme: Truth
-
No. Science Is A Moral Discipline Within Natural Law: The Means By Which We Warrant The Truthfulness Of Our Statements.
The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances. That’s what science is: A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech. Period. End of story. I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology. Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities. Ethelbert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups. Ok. We’re done here. “Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.” Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy -
Is The Cost Of Entry Into A Religion Acceptance of Falsehoods?
There is a difference between a cost of entry into a religion and the content of the falsehoods in the religion. Many cults do not ask us to pay physical costs, but to deny reality as the cost of entry. In fact, is that not the entire premise of the monotheistic religions? The price of entry is faith in falsehood? A cost of non-correspondence with reality? The signal of trustworthiness to others is the likewise denial? The shared lie? There exist amazing cults (stoicism), questionable cults (Buddhism), ignorance creating cults (Christianity and Islam), immorality creating cults (Judaism), and even worse cults that teach even worse lies.
There is no need for lies. History, myth, man, and nature are beauty enough and wonder enough without the need for lies. -
Is The Cost Of Entry Into A Religion Acceptance of Falsehoods?
There is a difference between a cost of entry into a religion and the content of the falsehoods in the religion. Many cults do not ask us to pay physical costs, but to deny reality as the cost of entry. In fact, is that not the entire premise of the monotheistic religions? The price of entry is faith in falsehood? A cost of non-correspondence with reality? The signal of trustworthiness to others is the likewise denial? The shared lie? There exist amazing cults (stoicism), questionable cults (Buddhism), ignorance creating cults (Christianity and Islam), immorality creating cults (Judaism), and even worse cults that teach even worse lies.
There is no need for lies. History, myth, man, and nature are beauty enough and wonder enough without the need for lies. -
If the we regulated the informational commons by requiring we warranty our speec
If the we regulated the informational commons by requiring we warranty our speech, then the NYT and Academy, would be organized crime orgs.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 17:14:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798937322553221121
-
If the we regulated the informational commons by requiring we warranty our speec
If the we regulated the informational commons by requiring we warranty our speech, then the NYT and Academy, would be organized crime orgs.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 12:14:00 UTC
-
(not that i like this idea, but under propertarian ethics, testimonial truth, an
(not that i like this idea, but under propertarian ethics, testimonial truth, and natural law, the NYT, and a lot of the academy, are classifiable as organized crime.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 11:40:00 UTC
-
Well you know there is only one test of one’s knowledge: survival in debate, and
Well you know there is only one test of one’s knowledge: survival in debate, and demonstrated success in reality.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 23:16:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798666122891407360
Reply addressees: @iamthehamish @SpeakerRyan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798665616609525760
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798665616609525760
-
It is a name, a description, a causal reference, an accusation, and a judgement.
It is a name, a description, a causal reference, an accusation, and a judgement. And as a judgement rests true or false.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 22:14:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798650414686027776
Reply addressees: @dallasosa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798648780924993536
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798648780924993536
-
@_DanielleBasile it’s not hate. it’s just true. costs. we don’t want to pay cost
@_DanielleBasile it’s not hate. it’s just true. costs. we don’t want to pay costs.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 18:25:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798592850153865216
-
If houses were restored to requirements for membership classes could conduct exc
If houses were restored to requirements for membership classes could conduct exchanges truthfully rather than propagandize with falsehoods.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 17:58:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798586074973044736