Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • The De-Professionalization of Information Distribution

    THE DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION OF INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION Little did they know what they were doing. But by removing the duel, libel, slander, and falsehood from the common law, the state eliminated warranty (skin in the game). And by the elimination of warranty under the law, converted a moral imperative captured in common law, to a moral imperative discarded in exchange for market profits. It was the elimination of duel, libel, slander, and falsehood under the assumption of a naturally moral man, and the catastrophe of free speech that made possible the war against the west: judaic cosmopolitanism, puritan postmodernism, french pseudoscientific moralism, and german pseudo-rationalism.

    THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BUREAUCRACY: DE-PROFESSIONALIZATION AND LOSS OF WARRANTY (SKIN IN THE GAME)

  • An Objective Analysis Of Cultural Philosophies

    Ill give you the objective model instead: 1-utopians(plato)(hindus),

    • The Utopian strategy is train men to be good,  so that no conflict need occur.

    2-truth tellers (aristotle),

    • The Aryan strategy is to resolve conflicts early and quickly so that they cannot be seized in a moment of weakness.

    3-truth avoiders (sun tsu),

    • Sun Tzu is the first philosopher of china. His message is to avoid conflict by use of delay and deceive until you can seize an opportunity in your opponent’s moment of weakness.
    • The Russian strategy is to exaggerate moral hazard, as an excuse to accumulate defenses, then seize territory in a moment of weakness.

    4 – The Truth Benders (russia) 4-liars (abraham),

    • The Judaic strategy is to use suggestion to create moral hazard, and then seize the weakness once it (deterministically) occurs.

    5-lying+ignorance(muhammed)

    • The Muslim strategy is to wear down the weak and overwhelm them in their moment of greatest weakness.

  • An Objective Analysis Of Cultural Philosophies

    Ill give you the objective model instead: 1-utopians(plato)(hindus),

    • The Utopian strategy is train men to be good,  so that no conflict need occur.

    2-truth tellers (aristotle),

    • The Aryan strategy is to resolve conflicts early and quickly so that they cannot be seized in a moment of weakness.

    3-truth avoiders (sun tsu),

    • Sun Tzu is the first philosopher of china. His message is to avoid conflict by use of delay and deceive until you can seize an opportunity in your opponent’s moment of weakness.
    • The Russian strategy is to exaggerate moral hazard, as an excuse to accumulate defenses, then seize territory in a moment of weakness.

    4 – The Truth Benders (russia) 4-liars (abraham),

    • The Judaic strategy is to use suggestion to create moral hazard, and then seize the weakness once it (deterministically) occurs.

    5-lying+ignorance(muhammed)

    • The Muslim strategy is to wear down the weak and overwhelm them in their moment of greatest weakness.

  • If a God Cannot Be Spokent of Truthfully, then How Can it be a god?

    I talk to my god every day. My work is the result of a promise to my god. But like I fight against false statements, false arguments, false promises, and false stories, I also fight against false gods, and the false words of men who create and preserve the false gods. For if god is not identical to, and known by truth then how may he be a god?

  • If a God Cannot Be Spokent of Truthfully, then How Can it be a god?

    I talk to my god every day. My work is the result of a promise to my god. But like I fight against false statements, false arguments, false promises, and false stories, I also fight against false gods, and the false words of men who create and preserve the false gods. For if god is not identical to, and known by truth then how may he be a god?

  • One Cannot Testify to Faith

    If you need faith to justify it, then you cannot testify to it. in other words, you cannot claim it is true.

  • One Cannot Testify to Faith

    If you need faith to justify it, then you cannot testify to it. in other words, you cannot claim it is true.

  • My God is the God of My Ancestors

    My god is very simple. He wants the truth. Because truth gives us power over nature, to bend it to our will. And the power of truth over nature is the source of the ascent of our people by transcendence from beast, to man, to human – and eventually, if successful, to gods. Just as our Aryan(european) ancestors, the aristocratic egalitarians, opened the brotherhood of sovereign men to any who can transcend from beast, to man, to human, by his warrant of sovereignty to other men, my god seeks to create a brotherhood of gods by seeking transcendent humans to join him, and to increase his numbers, by those equally able to wield truth and sovereignty successfully. My god does not seek subjects. He seeks peers: the brotherhood of sovereign men.

  • My God is the God of My Ancestors

    My god is very simple. He wants the truth. Because truth gives us power over nature, to bend it to our will. And the power of truth over nature is the source of the ascent of our people by transcendence from beast, to man, to human – and eventually, if successful, to gods. Just as our Aryan(european) ancestors, the aristocratic egalitarians, opened the brotherhood of sovereign men to any who can transcend from beast, to man, to human, by his warrant of sovereignty to other men, my god seeks to create a brotherhood of gods by seeking transcendent humans to join him, and to increase his numbers, by those equally able to wield truth and sovereignty successfully. My god does not seek subjects. He seeks peers: the brotherhood of sovereign men.

  • A Correction of “Truth, Goodness, And Beauty”

    THE ORIGINAL WASN”T QUITE RIGHT Sovereignty, Truth, Excellence, and Beauty. The original truth, goodness, and beauty betrayed an unfortunate lack of understanding.

    ……S E….+…..B ……T