Theme: Truth

  • I do my job. I am very good at my job. My job is to suppress deception so that w

    I do my job. I am very good at my job. My job is to suppress deception so that we are limited to open truthful reciprocal voluntary cooperation free of coercion, both private and public – which requires the persistence of European truth before face in public, to the public, in matters public. And there is no more moral and ethical position or duty possible by man. And if you disagree you are confessing to the immorality and criminality of your nature.

    Reply addressees: @Bent43303160 @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 01:23:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698869528090828801

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698867712183689374

  • It’s more that I don’t speak about what I can’t authoritatively speak about. I w

    It’s more that I don’t speak about what I can’t authoritatively speak about.
    I wish more people did the same. 🙂

    But humor aside, I’m not young and acquired aspie amounts of information along the way, studied history, engineering, computer science, neuroscience, ai, law and economics, I’ve had to work through the first principles of nearly every discipline. So I’ve studied what matters to people in solving the big questions. So it’s more that as an epistemologist, I understand all these systems of thought and what they can and can’t do and whether claims are possible from the information present. This allows us to vastly reduce silly claims even if for example I can’t get into the weeds in biochemistry or chemistry in particular, and while I grasp mathematics deeply as a system of logic I can’t necessarily use some of it with any facility.

    Now learning my (our) work provides that same understanding of the universe’s system and systems. The grammars and first principles, the ethics, testimony, and western group strategy of natural law are the framework for all knowledge. It’s just inconceivable that such a thing is possible.

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII @Hail__To_You


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 00:18:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698853037689774080

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698801204917387325

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: ADJUST YOUR NARRATIVES Gods NOT Men Spatial NOT Visual Ought N

    RT @ThruTheHayes: ADJUST YOUR NARRATIVES

    Gods NOT Men
    Spatial NOT Visual
    Ought NOT Should
    Mastery NOT Novelty
    Nuance NOT Ambiguity
    Co…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-04 14:04:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698698497644532038

  • I’m using the Socratic method. Is that toying with you? Or am I trying to assist

    I’m using the Socratic method. Is that toying with you? Or am I trying to assist you in gaining competency over yourself and the world?

    When I was fairly young, about 25, I understood just how dim the vastness of humanity really is – and was horrified. So from that day onward, I tried to help everyone I can at every opportunity, no matter how small, even if it was just to make them feel better. But that’s because it’s possible for me to. So is ‘toying’ with people not educating them? Isn’t every test I run a test of whether I can benefit people or the world? And am I just conscious that I almost everyone runs tests for themselves alone, and I run tests for everyone as well as myself, and take joy in it.

    So, should I, as me, behave as I do? Or should I behave as if I were you and behave as you do?

    Reply addressees: @zwholetruth @afoolishwiseman


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-04 02:02:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698516880846110720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698513291163607299

  • Josh, I don’t think you’re making sense without an explanation. But yes the auth

    Josh, I don’t think you’re making sense without an explanation.
    But yes the author was correct, and I was correct to confirm it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-03 02:24:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698160119500951965

    Reply addressees: @josh61597760 @Glennedgar3 @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698156077018239410

  • Well there is a reason for NLI Decorum Policy. We have to be very cautious. And

    Well there is a reason for NLI Decorum Policy. We have to be very cautious. And I have to watch Martin because his truth and clarity is often too much for some to bear. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 19:17:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697690120646746410

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697680998425825452

  • You can do your own research. If you don’t know how to user Perplexity AI then l

    You can do your own research.
    If you don’t know how to user Perplexity AI then learn.
    If you can’t do the research, then there is no merit in your criticism.
    It wouldn’t hurt to start with Reich on genetics.
    The research on neotenic expression (domestication syndrome) is voluminous.
    The research on neoteny in humans is voluminous.
    The research on both canines and apes is voluminous.
    Again, you’re nobody. You have no arguments. You post no criticism other than ignorance. There are potential criticisms of the existing science that you would easily offer if you knew the first thing about the subject matter. And I have no obligation to service people who are intellectually dishonest, and morally questionable when they’re claiming competence they obviously lack.

    I’m notorious for demanding critics ‘show intellectual honesty first’ because as anyone who follows me knows, I don’t hold any opinions that are strictly constructed from the research.

    Reply addressees: @nthg2see @BTC_i_Hodl @Mbali_2466 @_TOLANI_


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 19:11:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697688531617943552

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697672931948523779

  • CORRECTION “9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresp

    CORRECTION
    “9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresponsible intolerance or truth before face”

    It should read Intolerance FOR (or OF) truth before face… Apparently, the ‘f’ key was feeling insensitive today. 😉

    Thank you @IvarDiederik for catching…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 18:00:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697670772251042163

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697649965437268424


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    TWITTER WAS THE LAST STRAW BEFORE REVOLUTION?
    Here is the case we make:

    1. This new CEO, Linda Yaccarino, is going to ruin Elon’s ambition for Twitter – our demand for open discourse, and with it, place the final stamp of approval on revolution and civil war – the last straw by removing the last hope.

    2. Elon’s mission to provide a public forum necessary for the presentation of participatory government by informed citizens will fail.

    3. The X-Twitter platform as a political commons is a necessary public service in the preservation of participatory democracy in its conflict with organized social construction of the ‘March through the institutions of cultural production of western civilization and its process of, and demand for, individual responsibility in exchange for individual liberty.”
    Ergo, X-Twitter is political infrastructure not industry.

    4. But as infrastructure masquerading as a business, X-Twitter is bound by the need for subsidy by advertising, (until it can be supported by fees) just as politicians are financed by the financial sector donors.

    5. Advertisers are constrained by the undermining and cancel strategy of the left, which is repeating the Islamic means of suppression that has destroyed seven great civilizations of the ancient world and reduced them to ignorance and ashes of poverty and superstition.

    6. The left’s warfare against civilization relies on the antisocial behavior of the feminine method of warfare by undermining, shrilling, shouting down, canceling, gossiping, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, and moralizing in order to evade rational argument and reasoned discourse. (See “GSRRM”)

    7. So, instead, X-Twitter’s ‘SAFETY” will once again facilitate the spread of his antisocial behavior that is the primary means of undermining our institutions, our rule of law, by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, our republican government, our concurrent democratic participation. Why? Because there is no means of non-public resolution of disputes other than adversarial debate. Historically newspapers had asked a set of competent parties to comment, then displayed both sides of an argument, and let the public decide. In some cases there is insufficient evidence to decide (ie: the vaccine question) and we must make a pragmatic decision. But most importantly, our job is to expose evasions, denials, falsehoods, false promises and baitings into hazard by propagandists.

    8. Advertising and marketing programs are bound by the dominance of women in the field, their indoctrination by the academy, and the dominance of women in hyperconsumption, hypergamy, debt accumulation, spending of 70% of household income, and consuming 70% of government resources, while being net tax consumers subsidized by male taxpayers.

    9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresponsible intolerance or truth before face, which is the principle reason that our civilization was able to produce participatory government and rule of law and jury trials.

    10. None of us are any longer bound by the inalienable obligation for truth before face to the public, in public, in matters public.

    11. Through legal activism we are no longer bound by the common law requirement of truth before face, and reciprocity of exchange in matters of public speech.

    12. None of us are any longer bound by limiting ourselves to resolution of conflict by adversarial debate before the jury refereed by a judge.

    13. Through legal activism, we are no longer bound by the common law’s prohibition on conflict outside of truthful reciprocal debate or court – particularly the crimes of defamation regardless of material impact.

    14. Through legal activism against the courts we are no longer bound by demand for concurrency in voting or legislation.

    15. Through the process of deliberate undermining by:
    (a) majoritarian activism and
    (b) enfranchisement of all, regardless of merit,
    (c) direct election of the Senate instead of Senate a proxy for the governor, and
    (d) overwhelming immigration in lieu of demand for full integration, and
    (e) the desperate attempt to circumvent the Electoral College as well;
    … we are no longer bound by concurrency between classes and regions, with a small number of vast immigrant cities attempting to seize the continent as the north did in its war of aggression against the agrarian south.

    16. As such we are no longer bound by the common, natural, concurrent law of self-determination by self-determined means, by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, and inalienability of duty, truth, excellence, and beauty before self, limiting us to voluntary markets for cooperation whether private or public, or truthful reciprocal debate and adversarial competition before a jury of our peers.

    17. As such, as far as I can determine from the evidence:
    (a) We are no longer operating under the rule of the natural law of self-determination that is the only of suppressing conflict and maximizing cooperation.
    (b) We are no longer operating under the process of common law discovery of universal interests in conflict resolution.
    (c) We are no longer operating under the process of voting and legislation by tests of concurrency in agreement of interests between classes and regions.
    (d) Therefore, the state has failed to defend and secure our self-determination by self-determined means, by security of life, liberty, and property (demonstrated interests). And it is time for the replacement of this government and the restoration of our natural rights under our constitution of natural rights obligations and inalienations.
    (d) and the demand for restitution, punishment, and prevention against those who have brought about this criminal condition by sedition and treason both with intent, self-interest at the expense of others, and failure of due diligence against participation in such crimes.

    I think that’s a pretty solid case.
    Let me know what YOU think.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1697649965437268424

  • To have accumulated citations, I would have to pursue publication to obtain them

    To have accumulated citations, I would have to pursue publication to obtain them. And yes, people ask me to publish my work all the time. Because unlike most theorists I’ve had more than one revolutionary insight. But activism and results are all I’m interested in, not stamps of approval, or legitimacy in the academy – any more than Darwin sought it from the Church. And in activism, books matter more than papers. Darwin didn’t publish until he was ready. I have no interest in publishing before I’m ready. And thankfully due to the help of the staff at the institute, we’re progressing nicely.
    So, either you can seek to understand and debate me(us) with intellectual honesty, or you can’t. And so far, I haven’t found anyone who can find a hole in my(our) work anywhere. And that’s the whole point of it.
    Demand for cites is evidence you lack the knowledge to carry the debate on your own. Instead, bring arguments and cites with any objection. Otherwise, demand in lieu of them is childish. And it’s a tiresome, pretentious, effeminate, leftist trope.
    So don’t ask me to serve you in your current state of knowledge and ignorance, when I’m trying to serve mankind and be judged by history.

    Yes, I’m a little annoyed. 😉
    This is the ‘pain’ of doing my work in public.
    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 15:36:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697634622794760192

  • (FWIW: Search my feed for “apologies”, “sorry”, “my mistake”, “I should have sai

    (FWIW: Search my feed for “apologies”, “sorry”, “my mistake”, “I should have said”, and you’ll see plenty of admissions.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 15:07:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697627210851430869

    Reply addressees: @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697621471802114230