Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • TRUTHFUL ARGUMENT WITH FICTIONALISTS “If we are engaging in negotiation or argum

    TRUTHFUL ARGUMENT WITH FICTIONALISTS

    “If we are engaging in negotiation or argument, we want to know if we can cooperate with you. We prefer to cooperate with you only because cooperation in the long term is more rewarding than predation in the short term. The strategy of my people is maneuver: speed in adaptation. As such we practice Heroism, Sovereignty(Reciprocity), Contract, and Testimonial Truth. And because Maneuver using Heroism, Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial truth are the most expensive method of cooperation, it is only in our interest to cooperate with you if you can at least participate in Contract and Testimonial Truth. Otherwise, because of our use of Maneuver, by the high costs of Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial Truth, it is preferable to defeat you, kill or enslave, and take from you that which we cannot obtain by cooperation under contract and testimonial truth, rather than pay the unnecessary cost of your violation of contract, and your use of deceit. And so in negotiation and argument, if you cannot practice full reciprocity of sovereignty, and constrain yourself to that which you can testify to, then you are incapable of contract for reciprocal sovereign cooperation. And as such we need not discourse, only fight. So no, when you call upon your gods, you cannot testify to them because you cannot demonstrate them, only lie about them. While, if I call upon reason, I can demonstrate reason, and demonstrate all that follows from my reason, or I would not enter it into sovereign, reciprocal, discourse, negotiation, and debate. So if you rely upon that which you cannot demonstrate, then you cannot testify to it, and therefore you are incapable of truth, and therefore incapable of contract, and for these reasons we must, given no other choice, fight, defeat, kill or enslave, and take from you what we cannot obtain by cooperation.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-05 08:43:00 UTC

  • Truthful Argument With Fictionalists

    “If we are engaging in negotiation or argument, we want to know if we can cooperate with you. We prefer to cooperate with you only because cooperation in the long term is more rewarding than predation in the short term. The strategy of my people is maneuver: speed in adaptation. As such we practice Heroism, Sovereignty(Reciprocity), Contract, and Testimonial Truth. And because Maneuver using Heroism, Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial truth are the most expensive method of cooperation, it is only in our interest to cooperate with you if you can at least participate in Contract and Testimonial Truth. Otherwise, because of our use of Maneuver, by the high costs of Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial Truth, it is preferable to defeat you, kill or enslave, and take from you that which we cannot obtain by cooperation under contract and testimonial truth, rather than pay the unnecessary cost of your violation of contract, and your use of deceit. And so in negotiation and argument, if you cannot practice full reciprocity of sovereignty, and constrain yourself to that which you can testify to, then you are incapable of contract for reciprocal sovereign cooperation. And as such we need not discourse, only fight. So no, when you call upon your gods, you cannot testify to them because you cannot demonstrate them, only lie about them. While, if I call upon reason, I can demonstrate reason, and demonstrate all that follows from my reason, or I would not enter it into sovereign, reciprocal, discourse, negotiation, and debate. So if you rely upon that which you cannot demonstrate, then you cannot testify to it, and therefore you are incapable of truth, and therefore incapable of contract, and for these reasons we must, given no other choice, fight, defeat, kill or enslave, and take from you what we cannot obtain by cooperation.”

  • Truthful Argument With Fictionalists

    “If we are engaging in negotiation or argument, we want to know if we can cooperate with you. We prefer to cooperate with you only because cooperation in the long term is more rewarding than predation in the short term. The strategy of my people is maneuver: speed in adaptation. As such we practice Heroism, Sovereignty(Reciprocity), Contract, and Testimonial Truth. And because Maneuver using Heroism, Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial truth are the most expensive method of cooperation, it is only in our interest to cooperate with you if you can at least participate in Contract and Testimonial Truth. Otherwise, because of our use of Maneuver, by the high costs of Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial Truth, it is preferable to defeat you, kill or enslave, and take from you that which we cannot obtain by cooperation under contract and testimonial truth, rather than pay the unnecessary cost of your violation of contract, and your use of deceit. And so in negotiation and argument, if you cannot practice full reciprocity of sovereignty, and constrain yourself to that which you can testify to, then you are incapable of contract for reciprocal sovereign cooperation. And as such we need not discourse, only fight. So no, when you call upon your gods, you cannot testify to them because you cannot demonstrate them, only lie about them. While, if I call upon reason, I can demonstrate reason, and demonstrate all that follows from my reason, or I would not enter it into sovereign, reciprocal, discourse, negotiation, and debate. So if you rely upon that which you cannot demonstrate, then you cannot testify to it, and therefore you are incapable of truth, and therefore incapable of contract, and for these reasons we must, given no other choice, fight, defeat, kill or enslave, and take from you what we cannot obtain by cooperation.”

  • Abrahamism as the Manufacture of Ignorance: Informational Dysgenia

    ABRAHAMISM AS THE MANUFACTURE OF IGNORANCE
    (ending freedom of false religion, along with ending false speech, of which religious dogma is a member.)
     
    We tend to look at the demonstrated verbal superiority of the Ashkenazi, their long history of literacy, writing, law, hermeneutic interpretation, persuasion, and consequent success in occupations that require a combination of the estimation of others ability, the accumulation of textual information, and the exercise of persuasion (or coercion).
     
    But we forget that their group success is dependent almost entirely on eugenic reproduction, in which the community contributes money to the Professor (Rabbi) so that he may bear extra children, and that the community outcasts members who cannot perform to standard, and reduces the rates of reproduction through poverty of those that cannot perform to standard. So just as the european nobility redistributed to the middle and upper classes, the production of the underclasses, the Ashkenazi, redistributed the production of the host peoples to their upper genetic classes. And both the Ashkenazi and Europeans then specialized in self transcendence by (beneficial) suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses, and the redirection of energies to the upper classes.
     
    However, lets have a look at what Europeans (Aryans) achieved when they were literate, and what the Ashkenazi (and jews) accomplished when they were literate. Or lets ask it differently: what did Aryans and Jews accomplish when they practiced Abrahamism, versus before adoption and after departure from Abrahamism.
     
    Or put another way, what have the Aryans and Jews accomplished under Aristotelianism (European Aryanism), versus what have they achieved under Abrahamism.
     
    Moreover, what had the north africans, the Levantines, the Byzantines, and the Persians accomplished before Abrahamism? What did they accomplish under the long term effects of Abrahamism?
     
    Lets bring in the Indians. What did the Dravidians (Hrappans) achieve before Supernatural Aryanism. What did they achieve after Supernatural Aryanism? What have they achieve since the introduction of Aristotelian Aryanism?
     
    What did the Chinese achieve having never encountered Supernatural Aryanism, or Jewish Abrahamism?
     
    What occurred when the Chinese resisted Aristotelian Aryanism? What occurred now that the Chinese finally adopted Aristotelian Aryanism?
     
    Jews accomplished literally nothing despite being the most literate people in europe. Islamists accomplished nothing except the selective import of classical, persian, and indian thought, and upon consumption of those parts of those civilizations that they could consume, declined rapidly into even lower trust, even greater ignorance after 1200, even while invading europe for centuries to come, and spreading islamic ignorance from which spain and the southeast of europe seem challenged to recover from due to both cultural and genetic devolution.
     
    We tend to make excuses by justifying intentions. But if we look at the historical record, Supernatural Aryanism was used to educate if not subjugate the ignorant, and let to the eradication of the Supernatural (Iranian) Aryans.
     
    There is no greater crime than Abrahamism in human history. There is no greater source of ignorance and deceit than Abrahamism. No greater source of poverty. No more severe limitation transcendence.
     
    There has been no greater source of murder, death, starvation, than the combination of Third Generation Judaism in the form of Marxism, Socialism and the first jewish empire: the Soviet Union, and the French reformation of it into Postmodernism and the necessary reactions to it including Fascism; Nor and the Second Generation of Arab Abrahamism(islam), in which the tactics of Arab expansion of Arabic Abrahamism (Islam) which relies on intellectual seduction of the underclasses and women, raiding of capital and trade, and decentralized warfare, to obtain sufficient power to conduct conventional warfare internally and externally, to impose Abrahamic Ignorance upon people, and devolve them into increasingly ignorant, and unintelligent peoples.
     
    Just as freedom of speech must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful speech. Freedom of religion must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful religion.
     
    That is the less on of history.
     
    And all that prevents us from it, is abandoning our malinvestment in that branch of Abrahamism that perpetuated our dark age: Christianity, and its lies.
     
    The only value of christian teaching is the extension of kinship love to non kin thereby increasing the investment cooperation by which we train ‘cheaters’ that it is better to cooperate morally than ‘cheat’.
     
    A lesson we must understand, is not present in Judaism or Islam since both explicitly advocate asymmetrical polylogical ethics. (Lying, cheating, against non-members).
     
    Truth is enough. Save the West. Save mankind.
    End the unlimited, require limits.
    Require the limit of truthfulness.
    Require the limit of reciprocity
    Require the limit of full accounting.
     
    Deny the devolution of Abrahamism to our people, and man.
     
    END IT FOREVER.
     
    It’s quite simple you know. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information.
     
    Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true.
     
    HOW? INVOLUNTARY WARRANTY OF TESTS OF DUE DILIGENCE
     
    1 – Categorical consistency
    2 – Logical consistency
    3 – Empirical consistency
    4 – Operational consistency
    5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor)
    6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity)
    7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.)
    8 – Full accounting of consequences within those limits.
     
    White this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice.
     
    And all the culture along with it.
    And all of mankind as a consequence.
     
    End the invention of lying.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

  • Abrahamism as the Manufacture of Ignorance: Informational Dysgenia

    ABRAHAMISM AS THE MANUFACTURE OF IGNORANCE
    (ending freedom of false religion, along with ending false speech, of which religious dogma is a member.)
     
    We tend to look at the demonstrated verbal superiority of the Ashkenazi, their long history of literacy, writing, law, hermeneutic interpretation, persuasion, and consequent success in occupations that require a combination of the estimation of others ability, the accumulation of textual information, and the exercise of persuasion (or coercion).
     
    But we forget that their group success is dependent almost entirely on eugenic reproduction, in which the community contributes money to the Professor (Rabbi) so that he may bear extra children, and that the community outcasts members who cannot perform to standard, and reduces the rates of reproduction through poverty of those that cannot perform to standard. So just as the european nobility redistributed to the middle and upper classes, the production of the underclasses, the Ashkenazi, redistributed the production of the host peoples to their upper genetic classes. And both the Ashkenazi and Europeans then specialized in self transcendence by (beneficial) suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses, and the redirection of energies to the upper classes.
     
    However, lets have a look at what Europeans (Aryans) achieved when they were literate, and what the Ashkenazi (and jews) accomplished when they were literate. Or lets ask it differently: what did Aryans and Jews accomplish when they practiced Abrahamism, versus before adoption and after departure from Abrahamism.
     
    Or put another way, what have the Aryans and Jews accomplished under Aristotelianism (European Aryanism), versus what have they achieved under Abrahamism.
     
    Moreover, what had the north africans, the Levantines, the Byzantines, and the Persians accomplished before Abrahamism? What did they accomplish under the long term effects of Abrahamism?
     
    Lets bring in the Indians. What did the Dravidians (Hrappans) achieve before Supernatural Aryanism. What did they achieve after Supernatural Aryanism? What have they achieve since the introduction of Aristotelian Aryanism?
     
    What did the Chinese achieve having never encountered Supernatural Aryanism, or Jewish Abrahamism?
     
    What occurred when the Chinese resisted Aristotelian Aryanism? What occurred now that the Chinese finally adopted Aristotelian Aryanism?
     
    Jews accomplished literally nothing despite being the most literate people in europe. Islamists accomplished nothing except the selective import of classical, persian, and indian thought, and upon consumption of those parts of those civilizations that they could consume, declined rapidly into even lower trust, even greater ignorance after 1200, even while invading europe for centuries to come, and spreading islamic ignorance from which spain and the southeast of europe seem challenged to recover from due to both cultural and genetic devolution.
     
    We tend to make excuses by justifying intentions. But if we look at the historical record, Supernatural Aryanism was used to educate if not subjugate the ignorant, and let to the eradication of the Supernatural (Iranian) Aryans.
     
    There is no greater crime than Abrahamism in human history. There is no greater source of ignorance and deceit than Abrahamism. No greater source of poverty. No more severe limitation transcendence.
     
    There has been no greater source of murder, death, starvation, than the combination of Third Generation Judaism in the form of Marxism, Socialism and the first jewish empire: the Soviet Union, and the French reformation of it into Postmodernism and the necessary reactions to it including Fascism; Nor and the Second Generation of Arab Abrahamism(islam), in which the tactics of Arab expansion of Arabic Abrahamism (Islam) which relies on intellectual seduction of the underclasses and women, raiding of capital and trade, and decentralized warfare, to obtain sufficient power to conduct conventional warfare internally and externally, to impose Abrahamic Ignorance upon people, and devolve them into increasingly ignorant, and unintelligent peoples.
     
    Just as freedom of speech must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful speech. Freedom of religion must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful religion.
     
    That is the less on of history.
     
    And all that prevents us from it, is abandoning our malinvestment in that branch of Abrahamism that perpetuated our dark age: Christianity, and its lies.
     
    The only value of christian teaching is the extension of kinship love to non kin thereby increasing the investment cooperation by which we train ‘cheaters’ that it is better to cooperate morally than ‘cheat’.
     
    A lesson we must understand, is not present in Judaism or Islam since both explicitly advocate asymmetrical polylogical ethics. (Lying, cheating, against non-members).
     
    Truth is enough. Save the West. Save mankind.
    End the unlimited, require limits.
    Require the limit of truthfulness.
    Require the limit of reciprocity
    Require the limit of full accounting.
     
    Deny the devolution of Abrahamism to our people, and man.
     
    END IT FOREVER.
     
    It’s quite simple you know. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information.
     
    Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true.
     
    HOW? INVOLUNTARY WARRANTY OF TESTS OF DUE DILIGENCE
     
    1 – Categorical consistency
    2 – Logical consistency
    3 – Empirical consistency
    4 – Operational consistency
    5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor)
    6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity)
    7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.)
    8 – Full accounting of consequences within those limits.
     
    White this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice.
     
    And all the culture along with it.
    And all of mankind as a consequence.
     
    End the invention of lying.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

  • I have found nothing I cannot articulate other than falsehoods. Heroin and LSD a

    I have found nothing I cannot articulate other than falsehoods. Heroin and LSD are also informative, and one of them will kill you.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-01 01:53:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870096022223159296

    Reply addressees: @ThePlatonicChad

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870093722377220102

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/870093722377220102

  • Well that’s the whole issue. Abrahamists don’t speak the truth. Meaningful. Help

    Well that’s the whole issue. Abrahamists don’t speak the truth. Meaningful. Helpful. Parable. Yes. But all lies. Three books of lies. https://twitter.com/Dawn2334Dawn/status/869326077746966528

  • AN APHORISM ISN’T AN ARGUMENT, BUT AN INDEX One doesn’t try to make an argument

    AN APHORISM ISN’T AN ARGUMENT, BUT AN INDEX

    One doesn’t try to make an argument via an aphorism, but merely to draw one’s attention to the vehicle by which he may investigate that which he might use as an argument.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:37:00 UTC

  • AN ARGUMENT WITH A MUSLIM: HERE IS HOW IT IS DONE. STAY ON MESSAGE. REPEAT THE T

    AN ARGUMENT WITH A MUSLIM: HERE IS HOW IT IS DONE. STAY ON MESSAGE. REPEAT THE TRUTH. EXPOSE THEIR LIES JUST LIKE WE DO AGAINST LIBERTARIANS AND LEFTISTS.

    (You see, they sold their lies on the presumption that empirical evidence would accumulate more slowly their means of conquest of the underclasses. It worked among the jews, it worked in the ancient world via the christians. It worked in the medieval world by the church, and it ALMOST worked in the modern world by the jewish cosmopolitans and their french allies.)

    (I also want to interject that this fellow relies on feminine argument techniques such as NAXALT, False moral equivalency, and shaming, and straw men. And this leads us to repeat the observation that the jews (communists), the french (the most effeminate of europeans) and women (feminist, socialists), all make use of the female reproductive strategy, and the female means of argument. As such we must understand that it is the attempt to devolve society again by the reintroduction of matrilenalism, and if possible, matriarchy, that is being empoyed by islam, judaism, christianity, feminism, communism, socialism, postmodernism… all the ism’s against aristocracy here and in china are means of rebelling against our invention of aristocracy.)

    Jahan Khalili If Islam and poverty always existed there, but the radicalization never appeared until you started poking the hornet’s nest, the source of the radicalization is yourselves.

    (CURT: Um. Islam, evolved out of christianity as a means of resistance against the roman empire, the same way that judaism evolved out of zoroastrianism as a means of resisting the persian and egyptian and hittite and … every other superior people.

    Curt Doolittle This isn’t right. No one is very honest about these things so here is the very, very simple answer:

    (a) The purpose of american involvement was to prevent the soviets and the chinese from exporting communism and militarism to the oil lands.

    (b) the purpose of american policy since the end of world communism has been to transform the muslim world into a civilized rule of law and consumer capitalism and drag it out of ignorance and poverty as we did european, sinic, hindu, and christian african civilization.

    The problem is that muslims neither possessed the demographics (most muslim nations have near subsaharan african IQ’s), nor the history of quality rule (outside of persia) as did china and india (and less so russia). Nor any have muslims adopted literacy as had those countries, nor education. Nor had muslims adopted

    The USA’s supposition that persia could secularize, restore it’s heritage and develop into a core state for islam. WHen this failed americans tried to do the same with Turkey. However, it appears that demographically this is nearly impossible and that we must treat islamic countries (or at least the arab muslim countries) as just a militant version of subsaharan africa, that must be contained and allowed to mature at their own rate, just as we contained Russia and China.

    

    Curt Doolittle Islam was never able to break kin, clan, tribal, and national bonds, nor able to nor able to develop a professional governemnt, nor develop deflationary thought, and was unable to modernize in response to the industrial revolution.

    Jahan Khalili “The purpose of american involvement was to prevent the soviets and the chinese from exporting communism and militarism to the oil lands. “

    OK, so the purpose of terrorists who attack the West is to change the West.

    What are you trying to say? That purpose = right to do something?

    Curt Doolittle The only hope was Persia. The second hope was Turkey. But the ethnic arabs are, and seemingly have been, unable to develop land-holder (agrarian) ethics, and to develop agrarian genetics, and without these is having difficulty transitioning to industrial, and not even informational era ethics.

    

    Jahan Khalili Islam is not something monolithic. Muslims are fighting with each other.

    Curt Doolittle I have a very precise and scientific definition of right. So yes, they had teh ‘right’ to do something, since islam has been at war with the west for 1400 years, and has destroyed roman, north african, persian, byzantine, and north indian civilizations.

    Jahan Khalili Islamic imperialists judge the West just as harshly. The Westerners have been unable to stop spreading corruption like porn and alcohol. What do we do about these problematic corrupters and vice-spreaders?

    

    Curt Doolittle Islam is monolithic in the the sense that it is, like the other two abrahamic religoins, a set of lies, the purpose of which is to create ignorance, so that simple bpeople can be subjeted to rule.

    Curt Doolittle Porn and alcohol and nude women and all other temptations are designed to entrap weak people of weak character so that we can imprison or kill or punish them, and prevent them from reproduction.

    (CD: he moved on too fast, but this was a great opportunity to show that islam actually PREVENTS the acccumulation of the skills necessary for the suppression of implsiveness, which is why it is so useful for inferior peoples.)

    

    Jahan Khalili Can you explain how ISIS murders Shi’ites and Saudi Arabia persecutes them, if Islam is monolithic?

    (CD: Note the use of NAXALT)

    

    Curt Doolittle WHat does infighting have to do with the fact that islam has destroyed at least four superior more advanced civilizations, lost two standard deviations of intelligence, and impoverished everyone it touches, buy the mandatory indoctrination of people into a set of falsehooods, and fictional history, the purpose of which is merely to make them easeir to rule?

    

    Jahan Khalili The Islamic fanatics view the West as monolithic, too, with its many countries, cultures and very different and formerly fighting forms of Christianity. Would you agree with them?

    

    Curt Doolittle You know, a scientist doesn’t use ‘ideal’ terms like ‘monolithic’ because they are like religious terms, means of lying. Instead, we use deflationary language in order to prevent lying.

    

    Jahan Khalili Dude, you’re not an authority on this subject. You’re repeating propaganda that the Muslim-haters use as self-justification for further intervention, which caused this mess in the first place.

    Curt Doolittle So, the west has had conflcits. The musim world has had conflicts. But the fact of the matter is that arabs are the dumbest and most ignorant people in the world outside of south africa, and that they have destroyed four major successful civlivations, and reversed the evolution by down breeding.

    Islam has caused more death, ignorance, and harm than every other event otehr than the black plague and malaria.

    

    Curt Doolittle I am, in fact, an authority on this subject.

    

    Jahan Khalili That’s what you say

    Curt Doolittle I am in fact, quite possibly THE authority on truth.

    

    Jahan Khalili Catholic-Protestant wars

    Curt Doolittle And you are, as is typical, like an Abrahamist, avoiding any sense of empirical or logical argument by attempting to create moral equivalency by suggesting equality between things that are empirically and logically not equal in consequence.

    

    Jahan Khalili “I am in fact, quite possibly THE authority on truth.”

    Ridiculous. What’s the difference between you and prophet Mohammad?

    Jahan Khalili I have a beard and dark complexion and an Iranian name. That makes me an Abrahamist?

    (Note the suggestion that his appearance rather than his method of argument identifies him. Your method of argument determines your allegiance. )

    

    Curt Doolittle Mohammed, if he existed, was never mentioned during his lifetime, and every stitch of what is attributed to him is appropriated from christian and jewish sects. What separates me from ‘fictionalism’ is called ‘science’ or what is more accurately called ‘measurement’ rather than ‘analogy’, ‘parable’ and ‘fiction.

    

    Jahan Khalili

    There is no such a thing as a person who has the whole truth. Maybe you should be more humble. Have you ever even lived in an Islamic country?

    (CURT: Straw Man. Hyperbole.)

    

    Jahan Khalili

    I wouldn’t take an “expert on the West” who has never lived in the West seriously. We have plenty of those fake experts in Iran.

    (CURT: Note the fallacy: becuase you don’t know this particular, you can’t make claims about the general – ie: the consequences. Thats similar to saying that one’s intentions have some bearing on the consequences of one’s words and actions.)

    

    Curt Doolittle

    You are DEMONSTRATING abrahamic deceit by attempting to avoid answering the argument. This is the secret to abrahamic lying. Is or is it not true that the west rationally contained islamic peoples from adopting communism, and rationally still contains them because in the pre-modern era, for 1400 years, islam was a plague upon this earth causing more death and the destruction of more civilizations than the great diseases of malaria and the great plague, and the islamic peoples are still ignorant, illiterate, superstitious, poor, and expansionary, and violent, and harmful to more developed civilizations?

    THESE ARE SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC FACTS.

    Jahan Khalili

    Nonsense. You don’t know me or my motivations and are behaving like a fanatic yourself by projecting your ideas on me.

    (CURT: wait. A muslim… ‘projecting your ideas on me’. lol. No. I’m just trying to determine if he is a liar by intent or by habituation due to indoctrination into the lies Abrahamism.)

    

    Curt Doolittle

    You are demonstrating you are an Abrahamist (jew) by appealing to AUTHORITY (expert) rather than making an argument, or refuting an argument.

    Jahan Khalili

    LOL. I’m accused of appealing to authority after you claimed to be one?

    (CURT: Note that he stated that i needed to be an authority to have an opinion. lol So he made the appeal to authority, and I countered it.)

    

    Curt Doolittle

    I do not care what your motivations are. Your motivations are meaningless. (a) you are in fact making fraudulent arguments in the abrahamic tradition (b) you are in fact denying that islam has been the most destructive decivilizing force in history, and (c) you are denying that islam was a cancer on this earth and was the principle cause of the european dark ages because of raiding and plunder.

    

    Curt Doolittle

    So you are demonstrating abrahamism (jewishness) by your use of fraudulent argument, straw men, appealing to argument, denial of facts, use of moral equivalence between objectively moral and immoral civilizations.

    

    Curt Doolittle

    You are owned. You are had. You are defeated. You are a liar, an Abrahamist, and a justifier of lies, Abrahmism, violence, and the cancer of islamic civilization.

    Jahan Khalili

    Yes, everything is meaningless except your ideas which are golden cannon. No one – not even people who lived with actual Muslims – has any input that can be useful towards understanding the subject except yourself.

    (CURT: Ah. You don’t know how I feel fallacy. Straw man.)

    

    Jahan Khalili

    You are an angry man who is lashing out at someone you don’t even know over the internet.

    (CURT: Ad hom. Psychologism. Feminine. )

    Curt Doolittle

    So you again demonstrate that you are an abrahamic by making a false moral equivalency rather than answering the criticism that islam has been the most destructive influence on humanity other than the great plagues?

    

    Jahan Khalili

    You are aware that argument alone is insufficient to learn the truth, and that experience and gathering data play a role?

    (CURT: I kinda wonder how the empirical evidence of 1400 years of history and the destruction of four major civilizations has not been a matter of experience and data…. sigh)

    

    Curt Doolittle

    I dont’ care who you are because, it is my job as a moral man to stop evil in this world, and if you are an evil abrahamic justifier of parasitism devolution and death then it is my job to prosecute you.

    

    Jahan Khalili

    LOL. Whatever.

    

    Curt Doolittle

    Thank you for this discourse, so I can publish it and show others what it is like to argue with abrahamism.

    

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:20:00 UTC

  • (F–k. After two years of hard work we are finally getting somewhere with religi

    (F–k. After two years of hard work we are finally getting somewhere with religion. Damn. Truth was NOTHING compared to the problem of religion. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 09:50:00 UTC