Truth favors the european group evolutionary strategy, because meritocracy favors the european group evolutionary strategy. The reason being that europeans have demonstrated superiority when using truth and meritocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 17:04:00 UTC
—“Give the people heroes not lies – and not heroes who lie [prophets].”—Bill Joslin
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 11:32:00 UTC
LIMITING THE PREFERRED AND THE GOOD WITH THE TRUE
Well some of us are biased for true, and some for good, and some for preferable, and those of us who are biased for true, are better at ‘limiting’ those biased for the good and preferable, if we can deflate their ‘moral and normative’ language into ‘technical’ language. In other words, we must force them to meet us on our turf: truth.
Just as you cannot prove any system of logic within itself, and must appeal to the next higher dimension of logic (that includes more information), we cannot criticize the intuitive (preferable), good (moral and normative) unless we do so with the next higher logic: the true.
And the language of truth is deflation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 09:37:00 UTC
As I continue my work, I generally think more in terms of conflation and deflation. I’m not against religion – i think it’s necessary. I’m against falsehood. And that’s because falsehood is not necessary – and the consequences of it are terrible.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 09:17:00 UTC
WHY IT’S NOT MY JOB TO MAKE IT SIMPLE FOR SIMPLE FOLK: THE DIVISION OF COGNITIVE LABOR
(a) Have you read bacon, Locke, smith, hume, darwin, spencer, hayek and nietzsche? What about Marx, Engels, Boaz, Freud, Adorno, Foucault, Derrida? What about Cantor Poincare Hilbert, and keynes? Of course not. You don’t read original material. You probably don’t even read the people who translate their ideas into common context in intellectual history. It’s possible you read simplifications written by those that simplify the work of the translators into intellectual history. Its most likely that you ‘hear’ the rules of thumb that interested or educated people have learned from the simplifiers.
(b) Do you ask questions morally? Meaning do you ask how something CAN be true, or do you ask how you might err in how you think today? Especially given the evidence of what you know, have read, and have achieved in your life? No, you are another silly young male.
(c) Just as there is an occupational hierarchy of politicians > financiers > entrepreneurs > executives > professionals > managers > craftsmen > laborers > underclass, there is an intellectual occupational hierarchy of inventors of ideas (140+) > communicators of ideas (130+) > adapters of ideas(120+) > users of adapted ideas(110+) > users of instructions provided by adopters of ideas (100+) > imitators of instructions provided by adapters of ideas (100-) > and below 100 we get into rumours, parables, and sayings rather than the ideas themselves.
So ideas degrade with every generation downward. Common examples are that evolution is non-directional, other than the exploitation of niches, and the ludic fallacy that we can calculate probabilities of non-closed distributions.
So you know, I don’t take criticisms from dimwits seriously and I’m unkind to dimwits because I’ve found that most dimwits are either not worth my time, or they are just young men who haven’t learned how to ask questions using good manners. The way I test young men, is by shaming them. And that separates the moral young men, from the dimwits.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 08:39:00 UTC
RELIGIONS: SEPARATING THE OPERATIONS FROM THE CONTENT
I understand the value of Myth(Decidability), Ritual (Mass), and Mindfulness (prayer).
But do you understand that there is nothing in what you call ‘christianity’ that cannot be produced by truthful means, rather than lies?
So my opinion is, like a woman, or a child, you cannot separate the OPERATIONS: teaching myths for the purpose of shared decidability, performing rituals for the purpose of shared trust reinforcing thost patterns of decidability, and performing contemplative disciplines for the purpose of adapting to those patterns of decidability – from the CONTENT of those operations.
But that it is the OPERATIONS, regardless of the CONTENT that produce the ‘goods’ that result from performing those operations.
So as far as I know, you are ‘owned’ by your inability to deflate the operations, the content, and the training from those operations. And you treat the content as material, when it is the operations that are material regardless of the content.
It is trivially easy to reform our church. It is trivially easy to reform the operations in our churches. And trivially easy to reform the mythos of our churches. That is because the good that is in our churches is the use of Myth, Ritual, and Mindfulness to produce that High Trust of the European Peoples.
And we do not need the lies of the semites, who do not practice this high trust. We do not need the mental disease of the semites, to demand submission – that is the antithesis of our european peoples.
We have plenty of myths and decidability, we can always use the Feast (Church/Mass) ritual of Toast (preaching), Oath (Creed), Feast (bread) as an opportunity for creating common decidability and common trust.
And we can always use the some combination of self-analysis (Stoicism), internal dialog with archetypes (prayer), mindless repetitive chanting, and mental discipline (meditation) to adapt ourselves to the order we create by those means of decidability.
The difference is that we will need to return to the era when the men who lead such civic ceremonies are worthy of our audience.
Where the decidability provided by the content is materially transcendent, heroic, good, true, and beautiful – in the european heroic ethic not the semitic tyrannical.
Where the Feast Ritual heralds western man’s achievements in the real world, not the lies of the semitic world that imprisons men in ignorance.
We can reform our church.
But the first step is realizing that you err. That you value the content rather than the operations. But that you are wrong. It is the operations regardless of the content that makes a religion valuable.
And most importantly: there is no content on earth superior to the european scientific, technical legal, political, economic, cultural and historical.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 08:06:00 UTC
ABRAHAMISM
*why do you need to lie?*
*why do you need lies?*
*why do you fear truth rather than lies?*
The left has produced a false secular religion. They did it with pseudoscience and lies.
The right tried (failed), but is finally producing a secular religion without pseudoscience pseudo-rationalism and lies.
WHY DO YOU NEED TO LIE?
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-24 07:30:00 UTC
No matter what excuse you make for Abrahamism, in order to justify your priors, you’re stuck with one question: if it’s good, then why do you need to lie about it?
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-23 10:18:00 UTC
ALL PSYCHOLOGISM IS MERELY FEMINISM
Statements are true or false. Motives irrelevant except to explain the truth or falsehood. The strong state the truth or falsehood and ignore the motive. The weak and the women shame the motive to disapprove in order to obscure their ignorance.
All freudianism is just feminine shaming. Psychologism is just shaming in order to mandate feminine conformity.
Man up and criticize an argument.
(Irony intended as always)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 10:19:00 UTC
I reserve the right to be stupid and ignorant like everyone else. I just prefer people correct me rather than let me STAY stupid and ignorant. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 09:22:00 UTC