Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • Told ya. “Truth is Enough.” Playing the left’s game was a sucker’s bet

    Told ya. “Truth is Enough.” Playing the left’s game was a sucker’s bet.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 09:14:00 UTC

  • IS ENOUGH A short course in Testimonial Truth

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/TRUTH IS ENOUGH

    A short course in Testimonial Truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 07:24:00 UTC

  • I DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR RACE, NATIONALITY, OR GENDER I don’t care about anything

    I DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR RACE, NATIONALITY, OR GENDER

    I don’t care about anything other than the content and form of your arguments. I don’t care about nationality or race, or gender. All I care about is building an international group of people who can teach and use natural law in opposition to the abrahamic, marxist, frankfurt, and postmodern schools. Aristocracy For Everyone. Let a thousand Nations Bloom. No people can fail transcendence if they choose it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 14:46:00 UTC

  • Dear Lunatics, All you have discovered is that history is full of a lot of idiot

    Dear Lunatics,

    All you have discovered is that history is full of a lot of idiots like you.

    The job of historians is to discover the few fragments of truth despite the preponderance of idiots who wrote drivel and nonsense for popular consumption the same way that some idiot wrote the voynich manuscript: for money and fun.

    The world is a very simple place. All science whether human or physical is very simple. People are simple. It’s their fantasies and lies that are complicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 12:28:00 UTC

  • NEWBIES: ITS ALL ABOUT A SINGLE QUESTION: TRUTH —“Why do people follow this bl

    NEWBIES: ITS ALL ABOUT A SINGLE QUESTION: TRUTH

    —“Why do people follow this bloke?”–Declan Keating

    —“Because he uses lots of words”— Philip Maher

    ‘Cause I say smart things, for smart people, in language for smart people, and openly ridicule not-smart people, for not understanding smart things written in language for smart people. And believe it or not, there are smart people around the world. Conversely, only a simple pleb speaks in the simple language of simple plebs. So I don’t speak in the simple language of plebs, because I am not a simple pleb – and doing so would be pandering to simple plebs.

    Seriously though: *I am playing an internet game: How do you do serious philosophy and political theory using the internet as your classroom?* And I am asking one very big question: “Is it possible to legislate the demand for warranty of due diligence for public political and commercial speech just as we demand it for products and services – thereby freeing us from living in a world of lies?” Well, it turns out that there are people who want to do serious philosophy and political theory who can’t or dont want or won’t spend the money to do so full time in universities. And that they are interested in the answer to that question. The price of working as I do, is switching from philosopher, to professor, to troll (animal) controller.

    And it’s hard to separate the decent ordinary folk from the dick-weeds who waste my time and effort. So I have learned to Troll-fight with the best. 😉

    cheers. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 04:47:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) I do my job. I do it with rigorous discipline and consistency.

    (from elsewhere)

    I do my job. I do it with rigorous discipline and consistency. Even if I think I intuit the outcome, i ignore my intuition and continue my investigation through aggressive falsification. When the investigation is exhausted, and I can find nothing left to falsify I construct a solution out of what remains. Christianity must die, but jesus-ness is a good thing – as long as it is limited to *personal actions on those within the polity*.

    If you can find many other thinkers with this degree of commitment to falsification of everything they believe, I’d like to meet them. Because as far as I know, we happy few are painfully rare.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 17:46:00 UTC

  • THE PURPOSE OF MEMES, ARGUMENTS, AND THEORIES —“Memes < arguments < arguments

    THE PURPOSE OF MEMES, ARGUMENTS, AND THEORIES

    —“Memes < arguments < arguments turned into memes”—Benji Buckles

    That’s not quite right. Let me rephrase:

    3) Memes( distribution and advertising to opposition markets)

    2) Arguments (production and marketing to different markets)

    1) Theories (Research and Development regardless of market)

    I do theories and arguments. I don’t do memes.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:59:00 UTC

  • I WILL GUT THE ALT RIGHT’S USE OF POSTMODERNISM THIS YEAR I was connected to all

    I WILL GUT THE ALT RIGHT’S USE OF POSTMODERNISM THIS YEAR

    I was connected to all the top libertarians before I gutted libertarianism. History had already gutted marxism. Peterson and Hicks are gutting left’s postmodernism. I’m just showing how to gut all postmodern speech left and right. And I’ll take out the use of postmodernism by the right over the next year.

    And then we will have an honest discussion about how we will conduct civil war and destroy this government, or we will have one under which we devolve the regulation of norms to the regions, and limit the federal government (once again) to the regulation of trade between states, and the defense of the continent – just as europe will as the european project fails in tandem.

    The present is only novel to those who have not mastered history, economics, and demographics. People are just another domesticated animal. We are special only in that we can use language and reason to negotiate cooperation or war with each other, rather than throw feces and shouting.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:52:00 UTC

  • MEME FREE ZONE WARNING: No memes in this page. Memes are for people who cant mak

    MEME FREE ZONE

    WARNING: No memes in this page. Memes are for people who cant make arguments and so need memes. I can make arguments, and I made a forum specifically for good arguments. And I keep it ‘clean’ of non-arguments and most bad arguments.

    (Sorry. It’s a class thing. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:21:00 UTC

  • by Bill Joslin —“That’s the difference between Real (model), Ideal (argument),

    by Bill Joslin

    —“That’s the difference between Real (model), Ideal (argument), Supernatural (excuse).”— Curt

    (Gunna tattoo this on the inside of the eyelids for the next little while.)

    1 – SUPERNATURAL – undecidable

    2 – ARGUMENT – imaginable, possible (under ideal circumstances)

    3 – MODEL- possible within necessary conditions (operational, constant relationship).

    If the conditions are observable (without necessary interpretation) the model is extant.

    If not, can possible changes to relations with the condition be made. If so, then existentially possible.

    — Curt Responds—

    1 – Fictionalism [Supernatural] – limited by free association

    2 – Argument [Ideal] – limited by internal consistency

    3 – Model [ Real] -limited by sequential existential possibility.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 10:00:00 UTC