Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • Intelligence is an advantage but being less wrong is a bigger advantage

    Intelligence is an advantage but being less wrong is a bigger advantage.

  • Intelligence is an advantage but being less wrong is a bigger advantage

    Intelligence is an advantage but being less wrong is a bigger advantage.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-28 08:53:00 UTC

  • Intelligence is an advantage but being less wrong is a bigger advantage

    Intelligence is an advantage but being less wrong is a bigger advantage.

  • TRUTH: From Correspondence to Non-Correspondence 1 – Martial (Or we die) 2 – Tec

    TRUTH: From Correspondence to Non-Correspondence 1 – Martial (Or we die) 2 – Technological, (Or it doesn’t work, and we carry losses) 3 – Commercial (or we forgo opportunity) 4 – Normative (or we fail to create oppy’s for cooperation) 5 – Political (or we fail to create commons) 6 – Philosophical (or we fail to create common decidability) 7 – Theological (or we fail to create social mindfulness) 8 – Spiritual (or we fail to create personal mindfulness)

  • TRUTH: From Correspondence to Non-Correspondence 1 – Martial (Or we die) 2 – Tec

    TRUTH: From Correspondence to Non-Correspondence

    1 – Martial (Or we die)

    2 – Technological, (Or it doesn’t work, and we carry losses)

    3 – Commercial (or we forgo opportunity)

    4 – Normative (or we fail to create oppy’s for cooperation)

    5 – Political (or we fail to create commons)

    6 – Philosophical (or we fail to create common decidability)

    7 – Theological (or we fail to create social mindfulness)

    8 – Spiritual (or we fail to create personal mindfulness)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-27 11:04:00 UTC

  • TRUTH: From Correspondence to Non-Correspondence 1 – Martial (Or we die) 2 – Tec

    TRUTH: From Correspondence to Non-Correspondence 1 – Martial (Or we die) 2 – Technological, (Or it doesn’t work, and we carry losses) 3 – Commercial (or we forgo opportunity) 4 – Normative (or we fail to create oppy’s for cooperation) 5 – Political (or we fail to create commons) 6 – Philosophical (or we fail to create common decidability) 7 – Theological (or we fail to create social mindfulness) 8 – Spiritual (or we fail to create personal mindfulness)

  • Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is episte

    Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is epistemically superior to Truth. We spend all our time worrying about what’s true (cause it’s cheap) when the question is whether anything is false (which is expensive.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-16 11:56:00 UTC

  • Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is episte

    Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is epistemically superior to Truth. We spend all our time worrying about what’s true (cause it’s cheap) when the question is whether anything is false (which is expensive.)

  • Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is episte

    Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is epistemically superior to Truth. We spend all our time worrying about what’s true (cause it’s cheap) when the question is whether anything is false (which is expensive.)

  • PROPERTARIANISM WILL ABSOLUTELY HELP YOU DISCOVER INCENTIVES, JUST AS TESTIMONIA

    PROPERTARIANISM WILL ABSOLUTELY HELP YOU DISCOVER INCENTIVES, JUST AS TESTIMONIALS WILL HELP YOU DISCOVER FALSEHOODS.

    —“Incentives are not always easy to identify”—

    I dunno. I can almost always identify them.

    At worst, it’s pretty easy to create a range of possibilities. It takes practice. But we all want to acquire the same things. And we all start from pretty obviously different positions.

    I hate conflict but I can take care of myself. Hence why I have libertarian economic intuitions. ( I have high openness to experience )

    I loathe the priestly (pseudoscientific, pseudo-rational, pseudo-ideal, pseudo-mythical) caste. (Purity)

    And I feel revulsion toward the underclasses on every level (disgust, purity).

    Both of which are a defense of the commons – making me a conservative. (i.e. Masculine reproductive strategy)

    So I favor a conservative (eugenic) social order, but with lots of liberty (opportunity) for experimentation and variation in the status hierarchy.

    We can measure all these things and predict them and they’re all reducible to brain structures.

    We all make excuses to explain what is good when what we mean is that we have a preference.

    – Socialism: Feminine Dysgenic Distributed Consumption,

    – Market Liberalism: Balanced Market of largely meritocratic distribution,

    – Fascism(Nationalism): Masculine Eugenic Concentrated Savings

    Are an the Elephant, and only men are the riders that steer them. Women have necessary reproductive intuitions (Drives) but extremely dangerous political intuitions. Men pretty much have the opposite.

    If we are properly socialized we are compatible. If we are improperly socialized and given political license we are incompatible.

    Americans are improperly socialized.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-16 11:06:00 UTC