Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • OUR BRAINS Synthetic/Conflationary/Consensus/Solipsistic (integrated female brai

    OUR BRAINS

    Synthetic/Conflationary/Consensus/Solipsistic (integrated female brain)

    –vs–

    Analytic/Deflationary/Truth/Autistic. (compartmentalized male brain)

    Synthetic/Analytic : similarities vs differences

    Conflationary/Deflationary: summarize vs atomize

    Consensus/Truth : Social value bias.

    Solipsistic/Autistic: consequence of extremes

    These are consequential differences of the male and female brain extremes, with most of us functioning with a bias one side or the other from the center, and some of us at either extreme.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-23 13:36:00 UTC

  • by Curt Doolittle – Consistency in the categorical, internal, correspondent, ope

    by Curt Doolittle – Consistency in the categorical, internal, correspondent, operational, volitional, reciprocal, and fully accounted dimensions, create universally commensurable statements, just as certainly as constant dimensional relations in the first four dimensions are sufficient to describe any motion of and constant relations in time. by Bill Joslin: – Categorical = identity – Internal = is it logical – Correspondent = is it real – Operational = does it exist (how it exists , is real) – Volitional = is it doable – Reciprocity= is it successful (moral) – Fully accounting – necessary and sufficient for all of the above and all consequences accounted for.

  • by Curt Doolittle – Consistency in the categorical, internal, correspondent, ope

    by Curt Doolittle – Consistency in the categorical, internal, correspondent, operational, volitional, reciprocal, and fully accounted dimensions, create universally commensurable statements, just as certainly as constant dimensional relations in the first four dimensions are sufficient to describe any motion of and constant relations in time. by Bill Joslin: – Categorical = identity – Internal = is it logical – Correspondent = is it real – Operational = does it exist (how it exists , is real) – Volitional = is it doable – Reciprocity= is it successful (moral) – Fully accounting – necessary and sufficient for all of the above and all consequences accounted for.

  • by Curt Doolittle – Consistency in the categorical, internal, correspondent, ope

    by Curt Doolittle

    – Consistency in the categorical, internal, correspondent, operational, volitional, reciprocal, and fully accounted dimensions, create universally commensurable statements, just as certainly as constant dimensional relations in the first four dimensions are sufficient to describe any motion of and constant relations in time.

    by Bill Joslin:

    – Categorical = identity

    – Internal = is it logical

    – Correspondent = is it real

    – Operational = does it exist (how it exists , is real)

    – Volitional = is it doable

    – Reciprocity= is it successful (moral)

    – Fully accounting – necessary and sufficient for all of the above and all consequences accounted for.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-22 16:35:00 UTC

  • “Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be

    —“Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be based on metaphysical unknowns, they state quite clearly that their forms aren’t empirical. So from the emergence of liberalism and capitalism what do we find? An overload of justification to why some supposed metaphysical unknowns justifies the existence of private property and the preservation of old, clearly predatory, capital.”—Gage Benson They are based upon actionability, voluntary reciprocity, non parasitism, contract : eugenics. in other words possible contract in testable terms as a means of defeating universal parasitism. They are based on the use of merit to concentrate capital. They mirror evolution. And the success of western and eastern civs is due to evolution: superior neoteny through continuous contraction of the lower margin. this process allows for an increase in the normative means. You presume equality by demand for certainty as a means of preserving opportunity or parasitism. they demand action in furtherance of capital concentration via reciprocity as the test of truth ( existential certainty). they accelerate to save, while you decelerate to consume. you demand consumptive opportunity, they demand retention of production from risk. they force evolution, and you force devolution.

  • “Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be

    —“Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be based on metaphysical unknowns, they state quite clearly that their forms aren’t empirical. So from the emergence of liberalism and capitalism what do we find? An overload of justification to why some supposed metaphysical unknowns justifies the existence of private property and the preservation of old, clearly predatory, capital.”—Gage Benson They are based upon actionability, voluntary reciprocity, non parasitism, contract : eugenics. in other words possible contract in testable terms as a means of defeating universal parasitism. They are based on the use of merit to concentrate capital. They mirror evolution. And the success of western and eastern civs is due to evolution: superior neoteny through continuous contraction of the lower margin. this process allows for an increase in the normative means. You presume equality by demand for certainty as a means of preserving opportunity or parasitism. they demand action in furtherance of capital concentration via reciprocity as the test of truth ( existential certainty). they accelerate to save, while you decelerate to consume. you demand consumptive opportunity, they demand retention of production from risk. they force evolution, and you force devolution.

  • “Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be

    —“Yet the entire pantheon of liberal philosophy and economics admits itself to be based on metaphysical unknowns, they state quite clearly that their forms aren’t empirical. So from the emergence of liberalism and capitalism what do we find? An overload of justification to why some supposed metaphysical unknowns justifies the existence of private property and the preservation of old, clearly predatory, capital.”—Gage Benson

    They are based upon actionability, voluntary reciprocity, non parasitism, contract : eugenics. in other words possible contract in testable terms as a means of defeating universal parasitism.

    They are based on the use of merit to concentrate capital.

    They mirror evolution.

    And the success of western and eastern civs is due to evolution: superior neoteny through continuous contraction of the lower margin. this process allows for an increase in the normative means.

    You presume equality by demand for certainty as a means of preserving opportunity or parasitism. they demand action in furtherance of capital concentration via reciprocity as the test of truth ( existential certainty). they accelerate to save, while you decelerate to consume. you demand consumptive opportunity, they demand retention of production from risk. they force evolution, and you force devolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-22 16:29:00 UTC

  • I have a strict no-ridicule, no-meme, no-stupid policy. And it has worked well f

    I have a strict no-ridicule, no-meme, no-stupid policy. And it has worked well for me. Either make an argument, say something accomodating, or shut up. The way to defeat Ridicule, Shaming, Gossip, and Rallying ( feminine argument) is to return the ridicule, repeat the material question, avoid all engagement outside of it, and exhaust the other parties, using the venue to promote your ideas. If in person, use violence. i use it, recommend it, and write about it. All online attacks are marketing opportunities. If you are marketing the truth then likability is irrelevant. if likability is relevant then one is not selling a marginally beneficial truth.

  • I have a strict no-ridicule, no-meme, no-stupid policy. And it has worked well f

    I have a strict no-ridicule, no-meme, no-stupid policy. And it has worked well for me. Either make an argument, say something accomodating, or shut up. The way to defeat Ridicule, Shaming, Gossip, and Rallying ( feminine argument) is to return the ridicule, repeat the material question, avoid all engagement outside of it, and exhaust the other parties, using the venue to promote your ideas. If in person, use violence. i use it, recommend it, and write about it. All online attacks are marketing opportunities. If you are marketing the truth then likability is irrelevant. if likability is relevant then one is not selling a marginally beneficial truth.

  • I have a strict no-ridicule, no-meme, no-stupid policy. And it has worked well f

    I have a strict no-ridicule, no-meme, no-stupid policy. And it has worked well for me.

    Either make an argument, say something accomodating, or shut up.

    The way to defeat Ridicule, Shaming, Gossip, and Rallying ( feminine argument) is to return the ridicule, repeat the material question, avoid all engagement outside of it, and exhaust the other parties, using the venue to promote your ideas.

    If in person, use violence.

    i use it, recommend it, and write about it.

    All online attacks are marketing opportunities. If you are marketing the truth then likability is irrelevant. if likability is relevant then one is not selling a marginally beneficial truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-21 14:23:00 UTC