Theme: Truth

  • RT @ScottAdamsSays: If your opinion about free speech is the same today as it wa

    RT @ScottAdamsSays: If your opinion about free speech is the same today as it was in the eighties, you are not a serious person.

    In 2023,…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 04:49:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706893703560761744

  • Technically speaking I’m a genius by every measure. But I’m ok with you justifyi

    Technically speaking I’m a genius by every measure. But I’m ok with you justifying your disagreement by whatever means make you comfortable living in your alternate reality.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 19:51:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706758376070189552

    Reply addressees: @goingtofunky @Dave_Oswald_CEO @Abusoru @RadioTodd13 @9898guitar

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706757057443975623

  • Truth is

    Truth is.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 09:00:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706232283655483712

    Reply addressees: @j_szpanowska @schizarella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706223528863805708

  • Truth hurts?

    Truth hurts?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 08:15:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706220869574693180

    Reply addressees: @j_szpanowska @schizarella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706215829472153936

  • They are afraid of men, truth, responsibiilty, and adulthood as if they live in

    They are afraid of men, truth, responsibiilty, and adulthood as if they live in a fiction of pervasive trauma, instead of their own failure to mature in to competent adults.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 04:03:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706157360098464087

    Reply addressees: @AnonDehlvi @datepsych

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706142196892582072

  • Sorry princess but I am a genius by every measure, and more rigorous and truthfu

    Sorry princess but I am a genius by every measure, and more rigorous and truthful than you will find almost anywhere. YOu on the other hand are confirming my criticism and proving the science.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 00:07:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706098112912064742

    Reply addressees: @LaNadaSoy @schizarella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706097178345693185

  • FROM PROPERTARIANISM (PHILOSOPHY) TO NATURAL LAW (SCIENCE) Curt Doolittle change

    FROM PROPERTARIANISM (PHILOSOPHY) TO NATURAL LAW (SCIENCE)

    Curt Doolittle changed from using the term propertarianism to natural law, and founded the Natural Law Institute to convert his philosophical work into scientific terms.

    He explains his reasons for this change in his website, where he states:

    “I have been working on the problem of converting philosophy into science for a long time.

    And I have been working on the problem of converting moral philosophy into natural law for a long time.

    And I have been working on the problem of converting natural law into a constitution for a long time.

    And I have been working on the problem of converting the constitution into a religion for a long time.

    And I have been working on the problem of converting the religion into an educational system for a long time.

    And I have finally succeeded in all of these things.

    But along the way, I realized that the term ‘Propertarianism’ was too narrow, too specific, too technical, and too easily misunderstood or misrepresented by those who did not share my vision or my goals.

    I realized that the term ‘natural law’ was more accurate, more general, more universal, and more appealing to those who valued truth, justice, and freedom.

    I realized that the term ‘natural law’ was also more consistent with the history and tradition of Western civilization, which has always been based on natural law, whether in its ancient, medieval, modern, or postmodern forms.

    So I decided to change the name of my system from propertarianism to natural law, and to rename my institute from the Propertarian Institute to the Natural Law Institute.

    I also decided to revise and update my website, my book, my videos, and my other materials to reflect this change.

    I hope that this change will make my work more accessible, more understandable, and more influential to those who seek to restore and advance Western civilization in the face of its enemies and its challenges.”


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 00:00:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706096251266035712

  • Rita. No one. No one at all. Who knew me or followed me would imagine I am other

    Rita. No one. No one at all. Who knew me or followed me would imagine I am other than brutally skeptical and work entirely from the science.

    For you to come in out of the blue when you don’t know who you’re speaking to is… arrogant? Vain? A bit, dim maybe?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 22:45:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706077319964561429

    Reply addressees: @RitaMeterMade @decofuturism @Thaeus4 @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706073988303139275

  • “Q: Curt: Do you think “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”is a legitimate docu

    —“Q: Curt: Do you think “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”is a legitimate document? Curious.”–

    The Nameless War is solid book, though I haven’t done more than give it a quick scan and sampled read. The book “The Protocols” was first published, making use of eaerlier sources, in Russia in 1908.

    CONTEXT
    While the publication of Grimm’s in 1812, set off a tradition that reached its peak in the Romantic movement, and continued into the 1960s, and even early seventies, there was a tendency in much of the prewar period toward mysticism, seances, and magic, just as there was in 1555 when Nostradomus cashed in on women’s want of such things, after the sucess of the printing press. And this is also the age of the circus and their ‘exaggerations’, and this is even the period where those fake medieval torture devices etc were invented.

    So I take that work in the spirit that the authors intended it at the time (I assume) as an analysis of the jewish strategy if it were written by a european in the european sensibilities, given the spirit of the times.

    So legitimate document? Or a work of fiction that would capture the imagination of the audiences at the time? Which would sell better? The one printed of course.

    HISTORICAL RECORD
    Now, is there supporting evidence in the historical record both by jews and christians that the financial jews felt that they would be better rulers than the nobility and Aristocracies? And did they openly and frequently discuss this as a supremacist agenda? Of course. And they have over the centuries. However we should not that the jews and muslims are incapable of producing a stable and durable state until europeans made it possible. So the jewish understanding of what can be accomplished by jewsih ethics appears as impenetrable to them as western ethics are to our women – inconcievable. Because loyalty, sovereignty, reciprocity, and productivity, is required – as well as a commons that only europeans and the japanese have produced.

    The jews oddly enough pretend there is no jewish history prior to 1600, for the same reason their ancestors fictionalized history into one that was inspirational and aspiratoinal despite that they were ‘not liked very much’ and hired by the egyptians and taught numbers and letters so that these people who were outcases could be used to rule the locals. Or that during the time of roman occupation the jews were as predatory on their own and their neighbors as they were in the diaspora. they’ve developed a social structure that benefits from external disdain, by engagine in commercial activity that benefits some among the host, despite the vast cost to the people. Or, as Goldfarb says, “They always and everywhere ally with the state against the people, who eventually rebel, kill, rob, and outcase them as a consequence.”

    THE BEHAVIOR AND WHY EUROPEANS RESIST IT
    Claiming you are a good businessman when your specialization is baiting into hazard, allying with the state against the people, engaging in black markets slaving, and selling alcohol or prostitution or gambling on credit, to take advantage of the weak, or charging 300% interest on planting loans for crops, so that you can repossess the land and resell it without paying for it, is a pretty interesting business model.

    In my short time in my twenties I had the fun of prosecuting a jeweler, a franchies seller, and and two financial firms, run by jews that practiced this ancient traditoin and excused it by saying it was possible for their victims to succeed (even if extraordinarily improbable) but they failed for reasons not the lender’s responsibility. Except it was their responsibility not to bait others into hazard.

    Truth: We destroyed the lives of every single one of them simply by using the light of day before the court, the IRS, the FBI, and Postal Service. And one of them is still trying to pull scams in florida today. But guess what? No jail time. Nope. Just financial devastation. But never jail time. (Oops. That’s not true. we got one of his employees, but not him.) We have to make it a more serious crime. And our organization has done that.

    These people we prosecuted did not behave like normal people. They are like addicts for the immoral deal. The cheat. The assymetric win. The doing little for money. As if they enjoy hurting others. It’s unbelievable. And BTW: all of them were polish or russian jews. And that’s where I learned the difference between pre-war european and post-war eastern europen jewry. And IMO that’s the problem we have had in america. Because the earlier germanic integrated jews were doing just fine in the states.

    There are good people bad people regardless of culture or cult. We tend to dislike those who betray our trust and morals more than those who commit ordinary crimes (the italians etc).

    So there is a higher distaste for jewish criminality of betrayal than the western tradition of “Everyone’s gotta eat but you don’t mess with women, children, the elderly, or a man’s family – and no one needs to engage in treason because then you’re the enemy of us all.”

    OPINION
    The community’s issue is that they don’t stop their bad actors. If they did this would be over in a decade or so. Recent publication by Rabbis, who could easily take ownership of this ‘correction’ was helpful. But it needs to be consistent, aggressive, and curative to work.

    So, I hope this answers your question. 😉

    I’m not in the hate biz. I’m in the fix-it biz. 😉

    Cheers
    Curt

    Reply addressees: @J58039716


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 22:01:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706066227687206912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706053661565338000

  • (Correct) My goal is usually the audience not the other party. The best you can

    (Correct)
    My goal is usually the audience not the other party.
    The best you can do with another party is give them something to consider.
    The best you can do with the audiencde is to find people who you educate by the discourse, want to learn more, understand more, and develop.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 20:19:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706040720727949712

    Reply addressees: @Areez22 @JessicaCalarco @epopppp

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705995699945365909