– A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use.
– AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy.
– A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods.
– A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.)
– MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions.
– A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words.
– NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational.
Theme: Truth
-
DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE? RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY VS PHILOSOPHY VS LOGIC VS MATHE
DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE? RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY VS PHILOSOPHY VS LOGIC VS MATHEMATICS VS SCIENCE
– A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use.
– AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy.
– A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods.
– A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.)
– MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions.
– A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words.
– NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 15:43:00 UTC
-
Do You Know The Difference? Religion Vs Ideology Vs Philosophy Vs Logic Vs Mathematics Vs Science
– A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use. – AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy. – A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods. – A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.) – MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions. – A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words. – NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational. -
Who invented lying by fictionalism (suggestion, loading, framing, overloading,ps
Who invented lying by fictionalism (suggestion, loading, framing, overloading,pseudohistory, pseudo reason, pseudoscience) and why, and why is it that so many are attracted to comforting lies, and some people so good at creating comforting lies?
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-24 13:29:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944923109630595077
Reply addressees: @plevy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984
IN REPLY TO:
@plevy
Media and cultural evolution 📱 https://t.co/POideG59FR
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984
-
Story>Myth >-Pseudo-history(Fictional History) >+History >Pseudo-law > +Tort Law
Story>Myth >-Pseudo-history(Fictional History) >+History >Pseudo-law > +Tort Law > Scriptural Fictionalism and Hermeneutics >+Empiricism > Justificationary Rationalism (kant/rousseau,mendelsohn) > +Science > Pseudoscience (Marx,Freud,Boaz,Cantor,Mises) >Operational Science.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-24 13:27:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944922595073445889
Reply addressees: @plevy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984
IN REPLY TO:
@plevy
Media and cultural evolution 📱 https://t.co/POideG59FR
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984
-
A Prayer Of Heed
As a soldier i speak the truth. … it is best for soldiering. As a citizen i follow moral law as best i can. … it is best for prospering. As a craftsman i follow my arts the best i can. … it is best for competing. As a father i follow tradition as best i can. … it is best for parenting. As a man i follow reason as best i can. … it is best for deciding. As a sovereign i follow reciprocity as best i can. … it is best for sovereignty. As a warrior i follow by nothing but my will. So how is it that you speak to me? As soldier, on the subject of truth? As a citizen, on the subject of law? As a craftsman on the subject of competition? As a father on the subject of tradition? As a man on the subject of reason? As a sovereign on the subject of reciprocity? Or as a warrior bound by nothing but my will? Because if we speak of other than truth, prospering, competing, parenting, reasoning, or reciprocity – then i follow, and am bound, by nothing but my will. -
A PRAYER OF HEED As a soldier i speak the truth. … it is best for soldiering.
A PRAYER OF HEED
As a soldier i speak the truth.
… it is best for soldiering.
As a citizen i follow moral law as best i can.
… it is best for prospering.
As a craftsman i follow my arts the best i can.
… it is best for competing.
As a father i follow tradition as best i can.
… it is best for parenting.
As a man i follow reason as best i can.
… it is best for deciding.
As a sovereign i follow reciprocity as best i can.
… it is best for sovereignty.
As a warrior i follow by nothing but my will.
So how is it that you speak to me?
As soldier, on the subject of truth?
As a citizen, on the subject of law?
As a craftsman on the subject of competition?
As a father on the subject of tradition?
As a man on the subject of reason?
As a sovereign on the subject of reciprocity?
Or as a warrior bound by nothing but my will?
Because if we speak of other than truth,
prospering, competing, parenting, reasoning,
or reciprocity – then i follow, and am bound,
by nothing but my will.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-19 19:56:00 UTC
-
A Prayer Of Heed
As a soldier i speak the truth. … it is best for soldiering. As a citizen i follow moral law as best i can. … it is best for prospering. As a craftsman i follow my arts the best i can. … it is best for competing. As a father i follow tradition as best i can. … it is best for parenting. As a man i follow reason as best i can. … it is best for deciding. As a sovereign i follow reciprocity as best i can. … it is best for sovereignty. As a warrior i follow by nothing but my will. So how is it that you speak to me? As soldier, on the subject of truth? As a citizen, on the subject of law? As a craftsman on the subject of competition? As a father on the subject of tradition? As a man on the subject of reason? As a sovereign on the subject of reciprocity? Or as a warrior bound by nothing but my will? Because if we speak of other than truth, prospering, competing, parenting, reasoning, or reciprocity – then i follow, and am bound, by nothing but my will. -
Curt Doolittle, Analytic Philosopher of Political Economy, Ethics, Epistemology,
Curt Doolittle, Analytic Philosopher of Political Economy, Ethics, Epistemology, Truth. (quora objection?) THE CORRECT ANSWER While descending from two widely separated waves “generations” that moved out of Africa, Whites have succeeded in significant juvenilization (Neoteny). Asians have succeeded in far greater juvenilization(Neoteny). Asian women are the most juvenilized women on earth. To the point at which they have even gained extended lifespans by delaying the depth of and onset of sexual maturity (compare to central asians, arabs, and sub saharan africans that have NOT engaged in juvenilization.) Secondly, for reasons I am not sure I am confident in addressing, Asians distribute their fat more evenly. And thirdly, Asian IQ is slanted to our educated classes (I suspect it is a narrower distribution because of the juvenilization – and the asian predilection for killing off malcontents in large numbers). So between a ‘more immature look’, more petite look, better weight distribution, and higher average intelligence, the pool of asian women is objectively better than the pool of available white women. Conversely asian women pay a price for mongoloid facial features, and in places like eastern europe where women maintain their weight and walk a great deal, and dress well, asian women lose their advantage. That’s just how it is. (I spend an absurd amount of time on mating patterns.) That said, it’s largely asian women and white men that account for the increase in American race mixing, since the other numbers are remaining relatively stable. (relatively). This is yet another example of the fact that all human behavior can be reduced to some statement analogous to economics. Asian women are a better ‘buy’ than white women for average males. White males are often a much better buy than equivalent asian males who have their own decreased market value. Largely because asians seem to require high context culture (which I won’t go into) and whites thrive in low context cultures. (as is evident in our languages). So asian men in asia and here are at a disadvantage. cheers -
Curt Doolittle, Analytic Philosopher of Political Economy, Ethics, Epistemology,
Curt Doolittle, Analytic Philosopher of Political Economy, Ethics, Epistemology, Truth.
(quora objection?)
THE CORRECT ANSWER
While descending from two widely separated waves “generations” that moved out of Africa, Whites have succeeded in significant juvenilization (Neoteny). Asians have succeeded in far greater juvenilization(Neoteny). Asian women are the most juvenilized women on earth. To the point at which they have even gained extended lifespans by delaying the depth of and onset of sexual maturity (compare to central asians, arabs, and sub saharan africans that have NOT engaged in juvenilization.) Secondly, for reasons I am not sure I am confident in addressing, Asians distribute their fat more evenly. And thirdly, Asian IQ is slanted to our educated classes (I suspect it is a narrower distribution because of the juvenilization – and the asian predilection for killing off malcontents in large numbers). So between a ‘more immature look’, more petite look, better weight distribution, and higher average intelligence, the pool of asian women is objectively better than the pool of available white women. Conversely asian women pay a price for mongoloid facial features, and in places like eastern europe where women maintain their weight and walk a great deal, and dress well, asian women lose their advantage.
That’s just how it is. (I spend an absurd amount of time on mating patterns.)
That said, it’s largely asian women and white men that account for the increase in American race mixing, since the other numbers are remaining relatively stable. (relatively).
This is yet another example of the fact that all human behavior can be reduced to some statement analogous to economics.
Asian women are a better ‘buy’ than white women for average males. White males are often a much better buy than equivalent asian males who have their own decreased market value. Largely because asians seem to require high context culture (which I won’t go into) and whites thrive in low context cultures. (as is evident in our languages). So asian men in asia and here are at a disadvantage.
cheers
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-17 00:54:00 UTC