Theme: Truth

  • White Supremacists Claim That, If It Weren’t For White People, The World Would Still Be Living In The Stone Age. They Also Claim That White People Brought Enlightenment And The Modern World We Know Of Today. Is This True?

    Um. Its pretty hard to argue with deflationary truth (western objective truth). It’s pretty hard to argue with early european sovereignty and heroism. It’s pretty hard to argue empirically with socrates->plato->aristotle->(Epicureanism/Stoicism). It’s pretty hard to argue against greek tragedy and art. It’s pretty hard to argue against Roman law, and administration. It’s pretty hard to argue against natural law. It’s pretty hard to argue against Empiricism (enlightenment). It’s pretty hard to argue against the aesthetic, agrarian, industrial, financial, and informational revolutions.

    The only people who came close were the chinese. And despite a much longer history, and geographic isolation from ‘the tribal people of the desert and steppe’, and a much longer development cycle with a larger more homogenous population arguably more ‘pliable’ they didn’t. (And I am certain now that I can explain why.)

    Yet in a few generations in the ancient world, and a few generations in the modern world, white people dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature.

    If it were not for the Abrahamic Dark Age of Ignorance brought about by Judaism->Christianity->Islam, and especially the damage done to the western empire by christianity thanks to Paul of Tarsus and the eastern emperors, and more so the damage done to the great civilizations of the fertile crescent and north africa destroyed by the islam – the Roman and European peoples were very close to bringing about the first industrial revolution – the seeds of which were beginning by the time of Archimedes.

    yes, white people’s great civil war (world wars 1 and 2) ended the colonialism project by which we forcibly and profitably dragged people out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. And yes, had that project completed – at least in the British model of “raise and let them loose” as they did with america, india, and most of the other colonies. Then the world would be in a better condition today.

    And yes, if Americans had continued to China and Russia after the second world war, then we would have been prevented of the disasters of socialism and communism that still plague the (foolish) peoples of the world.

    That said. Europeans have committed suicide post war, and it has no sign of abating other than the possibility that the current stresses will lead to a single civil war that causes a chain reaction – out of envy of the consequences.

    https://www.quora.com/White-supremacists-claim-that-if-it-werent-for-white-people-the-world-would-still-be-living-in-the-Stone-Age-They-also-claim-that-white-people-brought-enlightenment-and-the-modern-world-we-know-of-today-Is-this-true

  • White Supremacists Claim That, If It Weren’t For White People, The World Would Still Be Living In The Stone Age. They Also Claim That White People Brought Enlightenment And The Modern World We Know Of Today. Is This True?

    Um. Its pretty hard to argue with deflationary truth (western objective truth). It’s pretty hard to argue with early european sovereignty and heroism. It’s pretty hard to argue empirically with socrates->plato->aristotle->(Epicureanism/Stoicism). It’s pretty hard to argue against greek tragedy and art. It’s pretty hard to argue against Roman law, and administration. It’s pretty hard to argue against natural law. It’s pretty hard to argue against Empiricism (enlightenment). It’s pretty hard to argue against the aesthetic, agrarian, industrial, financial, and informational revolutions.

    The only people who came close were the chinese. And despite a much longer history, and geographic isolation from ‘the tribal people of the desert and steppe’, and a much longer development cycle with a larger more homogenous population arguably more ‘pliable’ they didn’t. (And I am certain now that I can explain why.)

    Yet in a few generations in the ancient world, and a few generations in the modern world, white people dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature.

    If it were not for the Abrahamic Dark Age of Ignorance brought about by Judaism->Christianity->Islam, and especially the damage done to the western empire by christianity thanks to Paul of Tarsus and the eastern emperors, and more so the damage done to the great civilizations of the fertile crescent and north africa destroyed by the islam – the Roman and European peoples were very close to bringing about the first industrial revolution – the seeds of which were beginning by the time of Archimedes.

    yes, white people’s great civil war (world wars 1 and 2) ended the colonialism project by which we forcibly and profitably dragged people out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. And yes, had that project completed – at least in the British model of “raise and let them loose” as they did with america, india, and most of the other colonies. Then the world would be in a better condition today.

    And yes, if Americans had continued to China and Russia after the second world war, then we would have been prevented of the disasters of socialism and communism that still plague the (foolish) peoples of the world.

    That said. Europeans have committed suicide post war, and it has no sign of abating other than the possibility that the current stresses will lead to a single civil war that causes a chain reaction – out of envy of the consequences.

    https://www.quora.com/White-supremacists-claim-that-if-it-werent-for-white-people-the-world-would-still-be-living-in-the-Stone-Age-They-also-claim-that-white-people-brought-enlightenment-and-the-modern-world-we-know-of-today-Is-this-true

  • 3) The problem, and the one that creates the permanent vulnerability to any syst

    3) The problem, and the one that creates the permanent vulnerability to any system of calculation, truth, sovereignty, and reciprocity, is that people all desire false histories. My only correct critics so far are those that say ‘truth is enough to rule, but not enough for man’.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 18:19:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948982183133437952

    Reply addressees: @KyleHen44723716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948849390885666817


    IN REPLY TO:

    @KyleHen44723716

    @curtdoolittle Bureaucratic strangulation (modern system)-William. Before Norman colonial expansionism, there existed space to develop the base ideas of propertarianism. Question is where is the strength to protect it against organised long term planning? Can you direct me to defence methods?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948849390885666817

  • I know, you need ‘woo’. I don’t do ‘woo’. Sorry. Truth is enough

    I know, you need ‘woo’.

    I don’t do ‘woo’.

    Sorry. Truth is enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-03 09:45:00 UTC

  • I know, you need ‘woo’. I don’t do ‘woo’. Sorry. Truth is enough

    I know, you need ‘woo’. I don’t do ‘woo’. Sorry. Truth is enough.
  • I know, you need ‘woo’. I don’t do ‘woo’. Sorry. Truth is enough

    I know, you need ‘woo’. I don’t do ‘woo’. Sorry. Truth is enough.
  • Considering The Mainstream Media Bias In Favor Of Democrats, Does This Show That Us Media Is Broken And Must Be Taken Over By The Us Government?

    It shows that it’s time for extending the warranty of due diligence that we demand of products and services, to that of media and information, and to restore defamation (libel and slander) to their historical positions.

    The era of politics by “propaganda in the form of gossip” needs to end.

    https://www.quora.com/Considering-the-mainstream-media-bias-in-favor-of-Democrats-does-this-show-that-US-media-is-broken-and-must-be-taken-over-by-the-US-government

  • Considering The Mainstream Media Bias In Favor Of Democrats, Does This Show That Us Media Is Broken And Must Be Taken Over By The Us Government?

    It shows that it’s time for extending the warranty of due diligence that we demand of products and services, to that of media and information, and to restore defamation (libel and slander) to their historical positions.

    The era of politics by “propaganda in the form of gossip” needs to end.

    https://www.quora.com/Considering-the-mainstream-media-bias-in-favor-of-Democrats-does-this-show-that-US-media-is-broken-and-must-be-taken-over-by-the-US-government

  • “When you use the words 1) true, and 2) truth, what do you mean by them? And 3)

    —“When you use the words 1) true, and 2) truth, what do you mean by them? And 3) is it possible for such a thing as you mean to exist?”—

    0 – Identity(Tautology) Description: True(correspondent, consistent, existential, coherent) vs False (non-correspondent, inconsistent, non-existential, or incoherent) [Truth proper]

    1 – Calculation: True(without error) versus false(with error) [analytic truth] [axiomatic]

    2 – Deduction(induction): True (without error) versus False (with error) [ logical truth] [axiomatic]

    3 – Description( identity) : that description, definition, you would give if you possessed perfect knowledge, perfect vocabular, perfect grammar, and specified perfect limits and scope. [Ideal truth] [theoretic]

    4 – Narration: True(correct) versus False(incorrect). [testimonial truth] [ theoretic]

    5 – Legal Judgement: Right(non-imposition) versus Wrong(imposition) [legal right and wrong] [empirical]

    6 – Judgement: Right(correct) versus Wrong(incorrect) [moral right and wrong] [rational]

    7 – Normative Judgement: Right(obedient) vs Wrong(disobedient) [normative right and wrong] [habitual]

    Truth consists of speech that preserves constant relations in any grammar of decidability that we have produced, whether categorical, algorithmic, rational, narrative, legal, moral, or normative.

    Truth provides DECIDABILITY independent of preference or good, or norm.

    All these methods are existentially possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-31 11:51:00 UTC

  • “When you use the words 1) true, and 2) truth, what do you mean by them? And 3)

    —“When you use the words 1) true, and 2) truth, what do you mean by them? And 3) is it possible for such a thing as you mean to exist?”— 0 – Identity(Tautology) Description: True(correspondent, consistent, existential, coherent) vs False (non-correspondent, inconsistent, non-existential, or incoherent) [Truth proper] 1 – Calculation: True(without error) versus false(with error) [analytic truth] [axiomatic] 2 – Deduction(induction): True (without error) versus False (with error) [ logical truth] [axiomatic] 3 – Description( identity) : that description, definition, you would give if you possessed perfect knowledge, perfect vocabular, perfect grammar, and specified perfect limits and scope. [Ideal truth] [theoretic] 4 – Narration: True(correct) versus False(incorrect). [testimonial truth] [ theoretic] 5 – Legal Judgement: Right(non-imposition) versus Wrong(imposition) [legal right and wrong] [empirical] 6 – Judgement: Right(correct) versus Wrong(incorrect) [moral right and wrong] [rational] 7 – Normative Judgement: Right(obedient) vs Wrong(disobedient) [normative right and wrong] [habitual] Truth consists of speech that preserves constant relations in any grammar of decidability that we have produced, whether categorical, algorithmic, rational, narrative, legal, moral, or normative. Truth provides DECIDABILITY independent of preference or good, or norm. All these methods are existentially possible.