Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • 4 – So I’m happy to throw the masses breads of someone else’s baking, but testim

    4 – So I’m happy to throw the masses breads of someone else’s baking, but testimonial truth, operational grammar, and natural law are very hard crusts for the peasantry to chew. That said, I’ll have that debate if it’s in a forum thats well moderated.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 15:20:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955460202396049408

    Reply addressees: @Rewwgh @InsulaQui @TrueDilTom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955417881172471808

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955417881172471808

  • 2 – If we have a discussion with a series of questions to discuss first, that’s

    2 – If we have a discussion with a series of questions to discuss first, that’s ok.But for insula(libertarian justificationism), Tom(rationalism/justification) and doolittle(science and law) it would be difficult to say anything meaningful until we had some sort of text xchange.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 15:14:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955458672251035649

    Reply addressees: @Rewwgh @InsulaQui @TrueDilTom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955417881172471808

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955417881172471808

  • 1 – Generally, debates are a waste of time – in general, people are sufficiently

    1 – Generally, debates are a waste of time – in general, people are sufficiently rational but insufficiently scientific, which is the purpose of pilpul->theology->rationality – to avoid it. I don’t know Insula’s abilities, Tom is probably sophisticated enough. I don’t know.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 15:11:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955458019176968192

    Reply addressees: @Rewwgh @InsulaQui @TrueDilTom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955417881172471808

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/955417881172471808

  • The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism

    The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism is to avoid Empiricism by which we demonstrate our imaginings and our reason are not falsified by reality .)

  • The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism

    The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism is to avoid Empiricism by which we demonstrate our imaginings and our reason are not falsified by reality .)

  • The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism

    The purpose of Pilpul, Abrahamism, Theology, and Philosophical Justificationism is to avoid Empiricism by which we demonstrate our imaginings and our reason are not falsified by reality .)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 10:46:00 UTC

  • The Feminine Postmodern Mind Is Not Logical, Or Rational

    THE FEMININE POSTMODERN MIND IS NOT LOGICAL, OR RATIONAL but finds our equivalent of ‘truth’ in CONSENSUS, wishful thinking, and POWER. Make excuses for everything that the universe, evolution, and the incentives of your fellow humans deny you from obtaining without paying the price in physical, intellectual, and emotional costs. It’s all theft. Rouseseuianism, Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism are just the modern era’s reaction to the loss of using cheap approval and disapproval to obtain material discounts. Once you understand this, you understand everything. The female obtains through low cost behavior, high returns. Modernity prohibits her from doing so. So she simply scales her means of shaming so that her approval obtains her rents. This is all there is to it. Really. That’s all there is to Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.

  • The Feminine Postmodern Mind Is Not Logical, Or Rational

    THE FEMININE POSTMODERN MIND IS NOT LOGICAL, OR RATIONAL but finds our equivalent of ‘truth’ in CONSENSUS, wishful thinking, and POWER. Make excuses for everything that the universe, evolution, and the incentives of your fellow humans deny you from obtaining without paying the price in physical, intellectual, and emotional costs. It’s all theft. Rouseseuianism, Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism are just the modern era’s reaction to the loss of using cheap approval and disapproval to obtain material discounts. Once you understand this, you understand everything. The female obtains through low cost behavior, high returns. Modernity prohibits her from doing so. So she simply scales her means of shaming so that her approval obtains her rents. This is all there is to it. Really. That’s all there is to Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.

  • THE FEMININE POSTMODERN MIND IS NOT LOGICAL, OR RATIONAL but finds our equivalen

    THE FEMININE POSTMODERN MIND IS NOT LOGICAL, OR RATIONAL but finds our equivalent of ‘truth’ in CONSENSUS, wishful thinking, and POWER.

    Make excuses for everything that the universe, evolution, and the incentives of your fellow humans deny you from obtaining without paying the price in physical, intellectual, and emotional costs.

    It’s all theft. Rouseseuianism, Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism are just the modern era’s reaction to the loss of using cheap approval and disapproval to obtain material discounts.

    Once you understand this, you understand everything.

    The female obtains through low cost behavior, high returns.

    Modernity prohibits her from doing so.

    So she simply scales her means of shaming so that her approval obtains her rents.

    This is all there is to it. Really. That’s all there is to Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 08:17:00 UTC

  • Science Won. Philosophy Is Done.

    I don’t really know anyone who writes philosophy outside of science and logic that is anything but moral fictionalist. There are scientists, and logicians, and fictionalists. We have moral fiction, religious fiction, science fiction, we and fiction proper, as well as pseudoscience, pseudo religion, and pseudo-philosophy(pseudo-rationalism). We all daydream in our favorite method of daydreaming. Unfortunately some people conflate the fictional, with the achievable, with the true. Each is obvious from the grammar and semantics they make use of. It’s not an opinion, it’s simply fact. —“Your statement is philosophy.”— Cat Tibath My statement is one of science. That science is testimony. In this case, the grammar and semantics of truths, fictions and falsehoods. As far as I know, traditional grammar and semantics of philosophy is done as other than fictionalism (pseudoscience). Either we are seeking testimonial (true) speech or we are seeking something not testimonial (true). And instead seeking the preferable and the good. And as far as I know, that is all that is left for philosophy: choice of individual preference, and group preference (good). For that which is true, moral, ethical is just science. And that which is good or preferable is merely choosable by aesthetics, not decidable by truth. The vast majority of philosophy, and in particular all conteinental philosophy, is, as far as I know, moral fictionalism by people too lacking in interpersonal insight to write a great novel. 　 Science won.