Theme: Subsidy

Not only did we subsidize your immigration of the underclasses we bred-out of ou

Not only did we subsidize your immigration of the underclasses we bred-out of our people, but they ridicule us.

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 15:03:37 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797092421037391874

Reply addressees: @teerye21 @DavidSamuelAuer

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797090875201515520

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797090875201515520

November 11, 2016
I thought it was urbanites in immigrant cities, and those that are subsidized by

I thought it was urbanites in immigrant cities, and those that are subsidized by their underpriced labor who lost.

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 22:34:50 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796481201213153280

Reply addressees: @chrsdcook

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796464978395996160

IN REPLY TO:

@chrsdcook

#America lost yesterday. The world lost. #ClimateAction lost. #Workers lost. #environment lost. #NotMyPresident #TRUMP #ElectionHangover

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796464978395996160

November 9, 2016
MARKET FASCISM 1. Nothing but voluntary: …… Sovereignty, (a distributed dict

MARKET FASCISM

1. Nothing but voluntary:

…… Sovereignty, (a distributed dictatorship)

…… Liberty,

…… Freedom, and

…… Subsidy via exchange of behavior.

2. Nothing but markets:

…… Market for association ( and disassociation)

…… Market for consumption (economy),

…… Market for reproduction( marriage and family),

…… Market for commons (multiple houses),

…… Market for dispute resolution (common law)

…………wherein All differences adjudicated by

…………natural, judge-discovered, common, law.

…… Market for rule (freedom of exit).

3. Nothing but obedience

………… Obey the rule of law under natural law, or exit

………… No opposition is tolerated.

………… Deprivation, ostracization, physical removal,

………… …… internment, imprisonment, or death.

Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 21:05:00 UTC

October 26, 2016
Basic Income

There is no problem with paying dividends on the economy. I don’t see why that’s a problem. But every time I do the math I come to the same conclusion: that surpluses sufficient to create a marginal difference in the quality of life of the individuals are not possible. In other words, it’s pretty much impossible to implement a basic income scheme. What is possible is to provide chaotic windfalls, and distribute liquidity through to consumers. The data just hold up under that.

September 19, 2016
Basic Income

There is no problem with paying dividends on the economy. I don’t see why that’s a problem. But every time I do the math I come to the same conclusion: that surpluses sufficient to create a marginal difference in the quality of life of the individuals are not possible. In other words, it’s pretty much impossible to implement a basic income scheme. What is possible is to provide chaotic windfalls, and distribute liquidity through to consumers. The data just hold up under that.

September 19, 2016
All money spent on the construction, improvement, and maintenance of monuments i

All money spent on the construction, improvement, and maintenance of monuments in the physical commons shall be tax-free.

Source date (UTC): 2016-09-15 10:49:00 UTC

September 15, 2016
LIBERAL:”The Democratic Allocation Of Dividends From Production Of Commons To Ra

LIBERAL:”The Democratic Allocation Of Dividends From Production Of Commons To Raise The Standard Of Living Of Citizens.”

Source date (UTC): 2016-09-03 11:43:06 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772037198958956544

Reply addressees: @HeerJeet @JonHaidt

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/771851568228409344

IN REPLY TO:

@HeerJeet

@JonHaidt What liberal tradition? Locke’s support of slavery? J.S. Mill’s imperialism? FDR’s interment of Japanese Americans?

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/771851568228409344

September 3, 2016
CALORIC PRODUCTION PER CAPITA The only meaningful measure of this is the state’s

CALORIC PRODUCTION PER CAPITA

The only meaningful measure of this is the state’s capture of increases in productivity. As far as I know they are capturing far too much, but keeping 98% of 100 and keeping 60% of 1,000,000 are very different things.

The other direction is to question how have we priced outselves out of old age? I think that’s the question that’s frightening. And that’s the legacy of the 20th century. We have priced ourselves out of youth (childbearing) and old age(feebleness) in exchange for hyper-consumption in adulthood.

Source date (UTC): 2016-09-03 02:54:00 UTC

September 3, 2016
There is no problem with paying dividends on the economy. I don’t see why that’s

There is no problem with paying dividends on the economy. I don’t see why that’s a problem. But every time I do the math I come to the same conclusion: that surpluses sufficient to create a marginal difference in the quality of life of the individuals are not possible.

In other words, it’s pretty much impossible to implement a basic income scheme. What is possible is to provide chaotic windfalls, and distribute liquidity through to consumers. The data just hold up under that.

Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 05:55:00 UTC

August 27, 2016
RT @MartianHoplite: Blog post: #Welfare in #exchange for Good Behavior. #Nobless

RT @MartianHoplite: Blog post: #Welfare in #exchange for Good Behavior. #Noblesseoblige #winwin #incentives
https://hyperborial.wordpress.com/2016/08/21/welfare-as-payment-for-good-behavior/ https:/…

Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 20:15:11 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767455026184880129

August 21, 2016