(FB 1553181552 Timestamp) FRANCE: INSIGHT by Aaron Kahland One element of the yellow vest protests in France is not addressed by analysts of that protest. The increased tax on fuel is not merely a catalyst for general dissatisfaction. Mobility allows the upper working class and lower middle class French to segregate – live away from the Banlieue whilst continuing to work in cities. Fuel is already a significant expense for the French worker. Increasing the cost of mobility makes it difficult to segregate into smaller French towns / suburbs. Those affected can no longer afford to live in metropolitan, French, France and the tax threatens them with moving to non-French areas. The yellow vests have long since given up on any hope of entering the middle class which is why they are so desperate to clutch on to what remains of their France.
Theme: Subsidy
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553197269 Timestamp) SIMPLE MATH Total Govt Taxation = $3.42T Medicaid and Social Security = $2.841T Total Population > 18 = 272M Total Taxation / Pop = $12,000 $1,000/month/pp>18 = 100% of tax revenues. Estimated cost of Medicare for all + 2.1T
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553197269 Timestamp) SIMPLE MATH Total Govt Taxation = $3.42T Medicaid and Social Security = $2.841T Total Population > 18 = 272M Total Taxation / Pop = $12,000 $1,000/month/pp>18 = 100% of tax revenues. Estimated cost of Medicare for all + 2.1T
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553524740 Timestamp) The soviet system was possible for a short time because the state did not have to pay market wages for labor. Of course both corruption and black markets form in both american and soviet models. However, whether soviet or american nothing other than rule of law and universal standing can stop the accumulation of rents in the state an its dependents whether private or public. We always get it wrong: markets are good, serfdom is a good, and armies(servitude) is a good, since series markets, mixed markets, and servitude solve the problems of innovation and adaptation, market limitations, and non-market activity. And the only way to govern them is the competing markets of opportunity and dispute: the markets for the KIND of organization, versus the courts under the natural law of reciprocity REGARDLESS of organization.
-
Yep. Instead: 1.Nationalize mastercard, 2.Distribute liquidity directly to consu
Yep. Instead: 1.Nationalize mastercard, 2.Distribute liquidity directly to consumers bypassing the financial sector and the interest system. 3. eliminate consumer interest by direct loans from the treasury offset by these dist’s. 4. expand trade policy to repatriate labor. etc.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 01:27:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109265411357491200
Reply addressees: @MGonGivItToYa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109264096791166976
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109264096791166976
-
THE KILLED IT BECAUSE IT DIDN”T WORK. IT CAN”T WORK. SORRY
THE KILLED IT BECAUSE IT DIDN”T WORK. IT CAN”T WORK. SORRY.
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/Finland-is-killing-its-world-famous-basic-income-experiment–/
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 01:21:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109263927639187456
Reply addressees: @greg_jenner
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108714117609783297
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108714117609783297
-
So no, your claim that money is neutral does not apply. The first thing every la
So no, your claim that money is neutral does not apply. The first thing every landlord will do is increase rent. The first thing every local government will do is raise taxes. The first thing that every mortgage broker will do is increase mortage payments. etc.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 01:10:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109261122606194693
Reply addressees: @MGonGivItToYa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106999264482217984
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106999264482217984
-
As far as i know the net result would be an increase in rents, mortgages, home p
As far as i know the net result would be an increase in rents, mortgages, home prices, and taxes, making zero difference. So it is correct to say inflation of the money supply will not necessarily occur, but it does NOT mean that an increase in prices that consume 1k won’t occur.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 01:09:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109260735308328960
Reply addressees: @MGonGivItToYa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106999264482217984
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106999264482217984
-
You are insane. $1k/m/p>18 = 100% of the existing federal budget. We would have
You are insane. $1k/m/p>18 = 100% of the existing federal budget. We would have to double taxation. medicare for all would take us from 20%gdp to 30%. It would inflate away in 18 months, and the increase in taxation would destroy our economy sending what remains overseas.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 00:11:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108883756256018432
Reply addressees: @Crazyyelling @mplspat @BeadsGras @HoosierProg @NightlyPolitics
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107766473945174016
IN REPLY TO:
@Crazyyelling
@mplspat @BeadsGras @HoosierProg @NightlyPolitics If you don’t understand why this would easily pass Congress then you don’t understand life at all. If you can blow it off by saying “seen it” you haven’t seen it.. why would he pass one policy off to sanders when he doesn’t believe in sanders other policies? This isn’t socialism!
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107766473945174016
-
SIMPLE MATH Total Govt Taxation = $3.42T Medicaid and Social Security = $2.841T
SIMPLE MATH
Total Govt Taxation = $3.42T
Medicaid and Social Security = $2.841T
Total Population > 18 = 272M
Total Taxation / Pop = $12,000
$1,000/month/pp>18 = 100% of tax revenues.
Estimated cost of Medicare for all + 2.1T
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 19:41:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108815898163331072