http://24tv.ua/home/showSingleNews.do?putins_main_aim__occupy_whole_ukraine_kwasniewski&objectId=431334&lang=en”TO OCCUPY (CONQUER) THE WHOLE OF UKRAINE”
If Russia had something positive to add to the world, rather than as a source of corruption, brutality, and poverty, then that would be one thing. But Russia is a net negative influence on everything it touches.
Source date (UTC): 2014-04-10 15:18:00 UTC
I just get comfortable again and Putin goes and starts insurrections in three main cities so that he can have an excuse to ‘save’ the residents.
Playbook continues.
Dammit. Someone shoot that fking guy please.
Source date (UTC): 2014-04-06 16:08:00 UTC
–“Rights” are the terms in which the weak couch their desire for a liberty they have not the might to secure.”–Eli Harman
[Y]our fellow men and women do not desire liberty. They desires consumption, status, and ease. Liberty requires great expense, revolt against the masses, and constant diligence. The source of liberty is the organize application of violence to deny access to others, that which you have labored to obtain by voluntary means. The left’s irrational utopian vision is no worse than the rothbardian irrational libertarian utopia. Aristocratic egalitarians invented liberty. And the manufactured it with organized violence.
–“Rights” are the terms in which the weak couch their desire for a liberty they have not the might to secure.”–Eli Harman
[Y]our fellow men and women do not desire liberty. They desires consumption, status, and ease. Liberty requires great expense, revolt against the masses, and constant diligence. The source of liberty is the organize application of violence to deny access to others, that which you have labored to obtain by voluntary means. The left’s irrational utopian vision is no worse than the rothbardian irrational libertarian utopia. Aristocratic egalitarians invented liberty. And the manufactured it with organized violence.
—“American might allowed the advocates of international law to live in an imaginary world in which their doctrines actually matter. And now that they have finally succeeded in tearing down American strength and ushering in a post-American world, their own world will end. International law is a Potemkin village. A hollow facade upheld by the might of the United States. A post-American world means the end of international law.”—
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/the-end-of-international-law/
—“American might allowed the advocates of international law to live in an imaginary world in which their doctrines actually matter. And now that they have finally succeeded in tearing down American strength and ushering in a post-American world, their own world will end. International law is a Potemkin village. A hollow facade upheld by the might of the United States. A post-American world means the end of international law.”—
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/the-end-of-international-law/
[P]acifist (peasant and merchant) libertarianism is analogous to begging at the foot of the state, trying to get PERMISSION to enjoy some liberty. Aristocratic Egalitarian Libertarianism actively denies others the possibility of infringing upon liberty by the constant threat of violence. Or put in Propertarian terms, whining, whimpering, pleading, chastising and justifying are just excuses to do nothing to advance liberty and feel good about it, or relying upon ‘faith’ while waiting to get liberty at a discount, rather than pay the high cost of denying others access to your property. It’s just christian ‘waiting for the savior’ in secular language. We aren’t doing anything. The only reason it looks like we’ve moved the needle at all, is because everyone else is failing so badly – both the Cathedral and the Enlightenment are collapsing under the weight of democracy. [T]he source of liberty is the organized application of violence by every living should that desires it. And liberty is only earned by those willing to use violence to deny others the ability to infringe upon our liberty. The cause of moral intuition is the prohibition on free riding: cheating, and trying to get something at a discount at other’s expense. Pacifist libertarianism IS IMMORAL by that standard. [F]or millennia one gained property rights by fighting for them or committing to fight for them. That is the only means of possessing property rights – by obtaining them in exchange from others who are willing to fight for them. Everyone else is a free-rider. If they possess liberty. It is only because those willing to use violence to deny others access to property give it to them. That is a DESCRIPTIVE ethic. Rather than all the Continental nonsense that libertarians rely upon by taking cues from the obscurantism of the Marxists.
[P]acifist (peasant and merchant) libertarianism is analogous to begging at the foot of the state, trying to get PERMISSION to enjoy some liberty. Aristocratic Egalitarian Libertarianism actively denies others the possibility of infringing upon liberty by the constant threat of violence. Or put in Propertarian terms, whining, whimpering, pleading, chastising and justifying are just excuses to do nothing to advance liberty and feel good about it, or relying upon ‘faith’ while waiting to get liberty at a discount, rather than pay the high cost of denying others access to your property. It’s just christian ‘waiting for the savior’ in secular language. We aren’t doing anything. The only reason it looks like we’ve moved the needle at all, is because everyone else is failing so badly – both the Cathedral and the Enlightenment are collapsing under the weight of democracy. [T]he source of liberty is the organized application of violence by every living should that desires it. And liberty is only earned by those willing to use violence to deny others the ability to infringe upon our liberty. The cause of moral intuition is the prohibition on free riding: cheating, and trying to get something at a discount at other’s expense. Pacifist libertarianism IS IMMORAL by that standard. [F]or millennia one gained property rights by fighting for them or committing to fight for them. That is the only means of possessing property rights – by obtaining them in exchange from others who are willing to fight for them. Everyone else is a free-rider. If they possess liberty. It is only because those willing to use violence to deny others access to property give it to them. That is a DESCRIPTIVE ethic. Rather than all the Continental nonsense that libertarians rely upon by taking cues from the obscurantism of the Marxists.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2586531/Venice-votes-split-Italy-89-citys-residents-opt-form-new-independent-state.html#ixzz2whVdAdxjA “LITTLE BIRD” JUST TOLD ME THAT ITALIANS ARE MEETING IN SIENNA FOR MORE ‘SECESSION’ TALKS IN MAY. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2014-03-22 13:26:00 UTC
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2586531/Venice-votes-split-Italy-89-citys-residents-opt-form-new-independent-state.html#ixzz2whVdAdxj—“The Venetian people realized that we are a nation (worthy of) self-rule and openly oppressed, and the entire world is moving towards fragmentation – a positive fragmentation – where local traditions mingle with global exchanges.”…”We are only at the Big Bang of the movement – but revolutions are born of hunger and we are now hungry. Venice can now escape.”—
Source date (UTC): 2014-03-22 10:13:00 UTC