Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • Ukrainians do not have ablative armor. Putin forced ex-president to return all q

    Ukrainians do not have ablative armor. Putin forced ex-president to return all quality armor to russia.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 15:01:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802527733028790276

    Reply addressees: @GorskyDmitry @nntaleb @FamesBlond

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802527363926003712

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802527363926003712

  • Another russian lie. These are Russian soldiers sent into ukraine without insign

    Another russian lie. These are Russian soldiers sent into ukraine without insignia – which Putin admitted

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 14:59:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802527229028798465

    Reply addressees: @GorskyDmitry @nntaleb @FamesBlond

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802526958710128640

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802526958710128640

  • TRUTH: The rest of the world won’t let Ukraine collapse, but they WILL let Russi

    TRUTH: The rest of the world won’t let Ukraine collapse, but they WILL let Russia collapse.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 14:22:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802517826410053632

    Reply addressees: @GorskyDmitry @nntaleb @FamesBlond

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802510326226948096

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802510326226948096

  • “Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis” (“Thus always I bring death to tyrants”)

    “Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis” (“Thus always I bring death to tyrants”).

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 10:55:00 UTC

  • Huh. I thought that they were nationalists that want to save their country from

    Huh. I thought that they were nationalists that want to save their country from invaders and malcontents.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-26 01:18:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802320596453490692

    Reply addressees: @GorskyDmitry @nntaleb @FamesBlond

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802307259225219072

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802307259225219072

  • Definitions: Aristocracy vs Oligarchy

    Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY —“What are the features that distinguish aristocracy and oligarchy?”— William Butchman An aristocracy preserves a judge of last resort (monarch). You can kill a monarch and change the judge of last resort. It is much harder to kill an oligarchy (group). It is much harder to kill a government (larger group) it is much harder to kill a bureaucracy ( larger group ) An oligarchy subverts the market (rule of law) by use of: – Force – Gossip – Capital The defense against an oligarchy is a judiciary that rules by productive fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externalities. Most oligarchies persist only because they violate one or more of the provisions of natural law. Most commonly: productivity. In other words competition in the market and prosecution in court are EQUALLY necessary methods of preserving sovereignty by the suppression of parasitism, and the demand for sovereign transfer, in a market for opportunities, rather than in a market for rents, where the market for opportunities is made possible by nothing more than an increase in population density and an increase in the suppression of parasitism.

  • Definitions: Aristocracy vs Oligarchy

    Q&A: ARISTOCRACY VS OLIGARCHY —“What are the features that distinguish aristocracy and oligarchy?”— William Butchman An aristocracy preserves a judge of last resort (monarch). You can kill a monarch and change the judge of last resort. It is much harder to kill an oligarchy (group). It is much harder to kill a government (larger group) it is much harder to kill a bureaucracy ( larger group ) An oligarchy subverts the market (rule of law) by use of: – Force – Gossip – Capital The defense against an oligarchy is a judiciary that rules by productive fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to productive externalities. Most oligarchies persist only because they violate one or more of the provisions of natural law. Most commonly: productivity. In other words competition in the market and prosecution in court are EQUALLY necessary methods of preserving sovereignty by the suppression of parasitism, and the demand for sovereign transfer, in a market for opportunities, rather than in a market for rents, where the market for opportunities is made possible by nothing more than an increase in population density and an increase in the suppression of parasitism.

  • To Rule is to Limit, To Govern to Direct

    TO RULE ARISTOCRATICALLY IS TO LIMIT NOT TO DIRECT. WE MUST RULE, OR BE RULED. WE FORGOT. WE ARE MEN. WE MUST RULE.

  • To Rule is to Limit, To Govern to Direct

    TO RULE ARISTOCRATICALLY IS TO LIMIT NOT TO DIRECT. WE MUST RULE, OR BE RULED. WE FORGOT. WE ARE MEN. WE MUST RULE.

  • In Praise of Taxes

    Nov 19, 2016 12:29pm IN PRAISE OF TAXES 😉 (rulership is a profession, and one we must return to) Assuming that taxes are used for the purpose of the creation and defense of the full spectrum of markets. And assuming we have juridical defense against taxes not used in creation and defense of those markets. And assuming that tax competition exists by freedom of exit and absence of collusion. And assuming one of the markets constructed is a market for commons. Then taxes are merely a commission on the use of violence to construct markets that enforce production and deny parasitism. In other words, the Aristocracy may profit via commissions on the construction, maintenance, and defense of markets just like the provider of any other form of good, service, or information. In fact, the wealth created by profits from the construction, maintenance and defense of markets, is possibly the most morally defensible form of profit a man, family, and clan, tribe, and race can demonstrate. So again, the libertarians, classical liberals, and progressive liberals, and Marxist socialist have been wrong. While the liberation from the mysticism of the church by the scientific enlightenment has been a boon for man, the attempts by the various other classes to create monopolies favoring their classes rather than markets for the cooperation between the classes, has been predicated on moral falsehoods, pseudoscience, and outright lies. Like the Spartans, Athenians, Romans, Germans, French, we must rule for our betterment and the betterment of man, or be ruled against our interests, and against the interests of man. Not only should we tax. We should revel in our taxes. We should maximize the returns on our shares. And continue to profit from the incremental domestication and eventual transcendence of man. We were mistaken. We need NO OTHER CAREER than rule. Rule and fee for rule, by commission on successful rule, is perhaps the greatest of our achievements, and a means by which we have, can, and shall profit. What must we do to return to rule? Restore Rule of Natural Law (Science) Restore the Judiciary. (Rule of Law) Restore the Monarchy. (Judge of last resort) Restore the Nobility (Governors) Restore the Knights (Regiments) Restore the Sheriffs. (Police) Restore the Militia (disaster, emergency, war) Restore the Artisans (artists and craftsmen) Restore the Laborers (of the commons) Restore the market for marriage Restore the market for commons Restore the market for rule.