Look: our ancestors organized the west to produce agency because agency is required for fellow sovereigns. If you look at every other culture and civilization, what is it that those groups attempt to produce? Does islam teach agency? Does Confucianism? Does judaism? Does buddhism?
Theme: Sovereignty
-
Who Else Teaches Sovereignty? No One.
Look: our ancestors organized the west to produce agency because agency is required for fellow sovereigns. If you look at every other culture and civilization, what is it that those groups attempt to produce? Does islam teach agency? Does Confucianism? Does judaism? Does buddhism?
-
Libertarians are Beggars for Liberty
Libertarians are beggars for liberty. I’ve stopped using the term liberty. I’m not a beggar, or a free rider. I understand now that the only method of obtaining liberty is permission, and the only means of obtaining the equivalent without permission is sovereignty; and that sovereignty in fact can only be brought into existence by sovereign peers through reciprocal insurance: a militia. Aristocracy creates sovereignty by force. Because it is undesirable by the masses of parasites who either prefer parasitism or are a dead weight upon the rest of us.
-
Libertarians are Beggars for Liberty
Libertarians are beggars for liberty. I’ve stopped using the term liberty. I’m not a beggar, or a free rider. I understand now that the only method of obtaining liberty is permission, and the only means of obtaining the equivalent without permission is sovereignty; and that sovereignty in fact can only be brought into existence by sovereign peers through reciprocal insurance: a militia. Aristocracy creates sovereignty by force. Because it is undesirable by the masses of parasites who either prefer parasitism or are a dead weight upon the rest of us.
-
This Is the Final Word on Hoppeian Ancapism
A List of Hans Hermann Hoppe’s Errors https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/31/a-list-of-hans-hermann-hoppes-errors/ As far as I know, this is the final word on Hoppe. And unless or until he answers these objections (he won’t because he cant) we must separate Hoppe’s CONCLUSIONS from his JUSTIFICATIONS. In other words, once we reduce all social science to reciprocity and the voluntary exchange of property, we can deduce all of social science, ethics, politics, group evolutionary strategy, and law, from that reduction. However, his justifications (excuses, arguments) are nonsense up and until that point. I learned the most important ideas from him: the use of property as the unit of measure in the creation of a formal logic of natural law. However, I use science and scientific epistemology where he uses marxist and kantian rationalism: the sources of Marxist communism and socialism and social democracy, rothbardian libertinism, and Straussian neo-conservatism. If hoppe would debate me on this we would be able to illustrate that in three generations, between a jew, a german, and an anglo, we solved the second attempt at discovery of social science. But like most men he cannot (as rothbard did) accept that his most treasured justifications are only one degree removed from kantian rationals, as rothbard is one degree removed from jewish pilpul. The language of truth is science. It just took the three generations of us to complete the second scientific revolution. One that the germans started, but was cut short by the world wars.
-
This Is the Final Word on Hoppeian Ancapism
A List of Hans Hermann Hoppe’s Errors https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/31/a-list-of-hans-hermann-hoppes-errors/ As far as I know, this is the final word on Hoppe. And unless or until he answers these objections (he won’t because he cant) we must separate Hoppe’s CONCLUSIONS from his JUSTIFICATIONS. In other words, once we reduce all social science to reciprocity and the voluntary exchange of property, we can deduce all of social science, ethics, politics, group evolutionary strategy, and law, from that reduction. However, his justifications (excuses, arguments) are nonsense up and until that point. I learned the most important ideas from him: the use of property as the unit of measure in the creation of a formal logic of natural law. However, I use science and scientific epistemology where he uses marxist and kantian rationalism: the sources of Marxist communism and socialism and social democracy, rothbardian libertinism, and Straussian neo-conservatism. If hoppe would debate me on this we would be able to illustrate that in three generations, between a jew, a german, and an anglo, we solved the second attempt at discovery of social science. But like most men he cannot (as rothbard did) accept that his most treasured justifications are only one degree removed from kantian rationals, as rothbard is one degree removed from jewish pilpul. The language of truth is science. It just took the three generations of us to complete the second scientific revolution. One that the germans started, but was cut short by the world wars.
-
A Short Course in Sovereignty and Agency
DEFINITION: AGENCY (SIMPLE): https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155063860317264 LONGER: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155029341322264 DEFINITIONS: SOVEREIGNTY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154992876797264 NATURAL LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE RESTORATION https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155080414747264 THE DISTILLATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155077593257264 THE DEFLATIONARY SPECIALIZATION OF WESTERN CIV. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155055652697264 NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264 ARISTOCRACY: THE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF AGENCY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155053521147264 THE PROPERTARIAN TAKE ON WESTERN HISTORY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155027904187264 THE LANGUAGE OF SOVEREIGNTY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155019942397264 NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264 NATURAL LAW DOESN’T JUSTIFY ARISTOCRACY – IT JUSTIFIES MARKETS – IT IS JUST THAT NATURAL LAW IS ONLY POSSIBLE UNDER ARISTOCRACY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155137947447264
-
A Short Course in Sovereignty and Agency
DEFINITION: AGENCY (SIMPLE): https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155063860317264 LONGER: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155029341322264 DEFINITIONS: SOVEREIGNTY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154992876797264 NATURAL LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE RESTORATION https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155080414747264 THE DISTILLATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155077593257264 THE DEFLATIONARY SPECIALIZATION OF WESTERN CIV. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155055652697264 NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264 ARISTOCRACY: THE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF AGENCY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155053521147264 THE PROPERTARIAN TAKE ON WESTERN HISTORY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155027904187264 THE LANGUAGE OF SOVEREIGNTY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155019942397264 NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT. https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264 NATURAL LAW DOESN’T JUSTIFY ARISTOCRACY – IT JUSTIFIES MARKETS – IT IS JUST THAT NATURAL LAW IS ONLY POSSIBLE UNDER ARISTOCRACY https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155137947447264
-
The Failure of Liberalism Was Failing to Understand It.
Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism. The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services. It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.
-
The Failure of Liberalism Was Failing to Understand It.
Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism. The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services. It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.