Theme: Sovereignty

  • THROUGH BROTHERHOOD WE TRANSCEND OURSELVES, OUR PEOPLE, AND MAN It is only throu

    THROUGH BROTHERHOOD WE TRANSCEND OURSELVES, OUR PEOPLE, AND MAN

    It is only through the brotherhood of warriors that we can construct the contract of reciprocity, that insures our sovereignty, and as such, as a consequence of that sovereignty, we can only act and speak without violating that contract by use of the natural, common, law of sovereign men, a judicial ‘priesthood’ that masters and evolves the technology of that law, a market for freedom of association and disassociation; a market for reproduction(family); a market for the production of goods, services, and information; a market for the production of commons; a monarchy as a judge of contracts of last resort, and a market for polities under which each clan, tribe, and nation, can construct commons that assist every family, clan, tribe, and nation, in competing against the dark forces of time, ignorance, the vicissitudes of nature, and the devolutionary demands of the ‘lesser peoples’ of this world.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 13:34:00 UTC

  • THE PROFITABILITY OF DIFFERENT ORDERS, AND THE COST OF EACH (important) —“Curt

    THE PROFITABILITY OF DIFFERENT ORDERS, AND THE COST OF EACH

    (important)

    —“Curt: What is your opinion on feudalism?”—

    Sovereigns are more profitable than citizens, citizens more profitable than freemen, freemen more profitable than serfs, serfs more profitable than slaves, slaves more profitable than enemies.

    One must educate and develop recipes (techniques), manners, ethics, morals, common law, natural law, institutions of cooperation (truth, contract, money, banking, interest, and sheriff, judge, militia, and army, and freedom of association, marriage, markets, markets for commons, and cities) in order to evolve from command(slavery) to feudalism(serfdom), to republic(freemen), to monarchy(citizens), to aristocracy (sovereigns).

    That requires a great deal of time, and effort. But civilizing man is a profitable enterprise. It is the most profitable enterprise we have yet discovered.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 09:56:00 UTC

  • “Does Rule of Law by Natural Law assume we need a “ruler”?—@Curt Morehouse A d

    —“Does Rule of Law by Natural Law assume we need a “ruler”?—@Curt Morehouse

    A distributed dictatorship of sovereign men: the militia.

    We do however, require a judge of last resort (monarch).

    Not a ruler, but a judge of last resort.

    Via-Negativa in Everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 08:28:00 UTC

  • WE DO NOT ASK PERMISSION OF MAN TO RULE, WE ASK FORGIVENESS OF THE GODS IF WE FA

    WE DO NOT ASK PERMISSION OF MAN TO RULE, WE ASK FORGIVENESS OF THE GODS IF WE FAIL.

    You do not ask permission to rule by natural law. You overthrow the current order. You rule. You profit from it. People Prosper. Agency Emerges. Man Transcends.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 08:09:00 UTC

  • #Trump. Be Smart. Revolutionize the Base. Their numbers will swell. Social press

    #Trump. Be Smart. Revolutionize the Base. Their numbers will swell. Social pressures will mount. Use the people against the deep state.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 07:52:00 UTC

  • A MILITIA IS THE ANSWER. THE MILITIA IS THE SOURCE OF SOVEREIGNTY —“But how is

    A MILITIA IS THE ANSWER. THE MILITIA IS THE SOURCE OF SOVEREIGNTY

    —“But how is sovereignty produced? What are the necessary substrates (material) and predicaments (relations and incentives) for the emergence and sustainable continuation of sovereignty?”—Simon Ström‎

    A condition of sovereignty, is produced by the *incentives* to produce sovereignty, which consist of a large number of men, in a militia, none of which produce or possess sufficient wealth to coerce others into the coercion of others; living in an environment where there are no capital assets of sufficient value with which to make possible sufficient wealth to coerce others into coercing others. Sovereignty is produced by a significant percentage of men, who deny power to any man or men, for any reason.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 10:44:00 UTC

  • THE SCOPE OF MY WORK ON PROPERTARIANISM: Propertarianism’s Natural Law includes:

    THE SCOPE OF MY WORK ON PROPERTARIANISM:

    Propertarianism’s Natural Law includes: Transcendence, Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Decidability, Markets for Association, Cooperation, Production, reproduction, production of commons, production of polities, production of group evolutionary strategies at all levels.

    Let’s look at that again as a hierarchy:

    1) Transcendence (of man to human then to gods.)

    2) Agency, (by the production of agency)

    3) Sovereignty, (by the demand for sovereignty)

    4) Reciprocity, (limiting us to reciprocity)

    5) Decidability, (providing us with decidability)

    6) Markets: (limiting us to voluntary markets)

    … Association,

    … Cooperation,

    … Production,

    … Reproduction,

    … Production of commons,

    … Production of polities,

    … Production of group evolutionary strategies at all levels. (and in the end producing eugenic evolution without intentional design)

    7) Property (property in toto. The method of commensurability of changes in state via reciprocity.)

    8) The Logic, Grammar and Syntax of Cooperation.

    9) Testimonialism: the means of warranty of due diligence against error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism and deceit.

    Western civilization has disproportionately raised mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, tyranny, and disease in short order in both the ancient and modern eras. We achieved this through the use of soverignty, deflationary truth and deflationary organizations, producing competition as the means of testing all possible ideas, information, services, and products. Because we rely on constantly changing markets we can respond to changes in markets, and our institutions must respond to changes in markets for violence, gossip, and remuneration. And we are able to do this because for most of our history we have incrementally expanded natural law – markets into all walks of life, ensuring that we can adapt faster than other civilizations to change – even if that means we have generation long wars in order to change between eras: but at least we change while others stagnate.

    So while some of us desire the experiential consumption made possible by the west’s civilization, and others desire ‘not to be defeated by evil’, others desire sovereignty, others desire clan, tribal, national, or racial persistence – others desire the transcendence of man. And all of these desires can be fulfilled under natural law as long as we are willing to prevent those who are unwilling and unable to participate in that effort from reproduction. The opposite view is simply the opposite desires across the same spectrum: current consumption, and persistence of one’s genes despite the evidence that they force costs on mankind for eternity.

    Natural Law completes the sciences up to sentience. We cannot solve sentience with the information currently at our disposal, although it appears that it is on the horizon of our abilities.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-21 12:37:00 UTC

  • 3) I cannot, from this, ascertain argumentative structures (real, ideal, superna

    3) I cannot, from this, ascertain argumentative structures (real, ideal, supernatural), or strategy(sovereign,parasitic,authoritarian).


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-20 14:06:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/855060056026599426

    Reply addressees: @whereforefriend

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/855032809697800192


    IN REPLY TO:

    @whereforefriend

    @curtdoolittle You discuss modes in which ethnic groups have operated. Russians thru literature. et cetera. Would the Celtic mode be bardic?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/855032809697800192

  • Joel Davis on Deflationary Government

    By John Dow The enforcers (sovereigns) produce law, and as a consequence, markets. The taxpayers (subjects) use the markets, under the law, as consumers of market goods, services, and information. I would advocate a constitution as a contract of mutually enforced recipriocity (justice) between enforcers. I would advocate the enforcers appoint a supreme justice (or supreme court of justices) as supreme authorities on the application of the constitution. I would advocate the enforcers appoint a governor-general (president) as supreme commander (chief executive) of the enforcers. And, I would advocate a senate to represent them in negotiations with other sovereigns (foreign policy), and with their customers (taxpayers) who I would advocate have their own house of representatives they elect to negotiate on their behalf with the enforcer elected senate (economic policy).

  • Joel Davis on Deflationary Government

    By John Dow The enforcers (sovereigns) produce law, and as a consequence, markets. The taxpayers (subjects) use the markets, under the law, as consumers of market goods, services, and information. I would advocate a constitution as a contract of mutually enforced recipriocity (justice) between enforcers. I would advocate the enforcers appoint a supreme justice (or supreme court of justices) as supreme authorities on the application of the constitution. I would advocate the enforcers appoint a governor-general (president) as supreme commander (chief executive) of the enforcers. And, I would advocate a senate to represent them in negotiations with other sovereigns (foreign policy), and with their customers (taxpayers) who I would advocate have their own house of representatives they elect to negotiate on their behalf with the enforcer elected senate (economic policy).