Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • Faustian man is a literary analogy not a causal description.Sovereignty is the c

    Faustian man is a literary analogy not a causal description.Sovereignty is the causal property of western civilization. All results from it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 16:41:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/861621993229217792

    Reply addressees: @schopee

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/861601555765538816

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/861601555765538816

  • Aryanism (Western Civilization): Stoicism, Sovereignty, Natural Law of Reciproci

    Aryanism (Western Civilization): Stoicism, Sovereignty, Natural Law of Reciprocity, and Markets in Everything as a consequence.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 11:16:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/861540185380663296

  • A MANIFESTO FOR THE RETURN TO ARISTOCRACY: YOU LACK COERCIVE POWER OVER YOURSELV

    A MANIFESTO FOR THE RETURN TO ARISTOCRACY: YOU LACK COERCIVE POWER OVER YOURSELVES, SO YOU MAY NOT HOLD COERCIVE POWER OVER OTHERS.

    The only reason not to kill, enslave, beat, or take from you is if you agree at least to avoid parasitism, and at best to engage in reciprocally rewarding cooperation.

    One can walk away in silence, and mind his or her own business, and engage in boycott. This is, at a minimum, a failure to cooperate, and at a maximum, an attempt to separate and form a polity more desirous than the current one. But it is not a violation of reciprocity or sovereignty.

    But to engage in ridicule, shaming, rallying, straw men, double standards, conspiracy, propaganda, and advocacy of parasitism to actively violate sovereignty, reciprocity, meritocracy, and the transcendence of man, merely states that we are not longer cooperating, and you are engaging in parasitism and not yet engaging in violence.

    As such, as we are no longer cooperating, and you are engaging in parasitism, we no longer possess any incentive other than to engage in predation, including killing, enslaving, punishing, and taking.

    The only reason a state allows parasitism, ridicule, shaming, rallying and deceit, is to profit from the creation of conflict by expanding its totalitarian influence over that of reciprocity. The only reason not to kill, enslave, punish, and take from members of the state is if they eliminate means of parasitism, and allow markets to determine reward by merit.

    We have no reason any longer, to constrain our violence – violence that we pay the cost of forgoing the use of on a daily if not hourly basis, for the purpose of improving the lot of ourselves, our families, our kin, our nation, and mankind, by the imposition of sovereignty and the incremental evolution of agency.

    We spent over a century giving you license to join the aristocracy of meritocracy that constitutes western civilization. You have proven that you are unfit for that membership in the peerage of the sovereign. You lack agency, morality, ethical ability, character necessary for treatment as equal: as sovereigns, and therefore as ‘humans’. You are still an animal, unfit for subsidy, freedom, liberty or sovereignty.

    Our experiment was moral, ethical, and pursued out of honest belief in your ability. And our experiment failed. And so we return to our traditional rule, by and return you to domesticated animal conditions.

    We could blame you. But you are just animals. You lack the personal agency and the genetic sufficiency, to join the world of sovereign men.

    We will grant you protections under natural law, since you are capable, if disciplined, of cooperation.

    But you shall no longer hold coercive powers over others, because by your words and deeds, you demonstrably, lack the coercive power over yourselves.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Sovereigns

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Industrialization of Agency

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 08:01:00 UTC

  • Aryanism (Western Civilization): – Transcendence through Agency: The Goal Of Man

    Aryanism (Western Civilization):

    – Transcendence through Agency: The Goal Of Man.

    – Stoicism: A personal discipline of action: Personal Agency

    – Sovereignty: Interpersonal Agency

    – Natural Law of Reciprocity: Political Agency

    – Markets in Everything as a consequence: Agency in All Things.

    But it is an empirical and meritocratic system.

    It is evolutionary and therefore eugenic.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 07:34:00 UTC

  • Aryanism (Western Civilization): Stoicism, Sovereignty, Natural Law of Reciproci

    Aryanism (Western Civilization): Stoicism, Sovereignty, Natural Law of Reciprocity, and Markets in Everything as a consequence.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 07:16:00 UTC

  • LET ME HELP YOU. Stop worrying about france. Democracy is the enemy. You are the

    LET ME HELP YOU.

    Stop worrying about france.

    Democracy is the enemy.

    You are the last hope for your people.

    Are you going to do what it takes?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-07 20:11:00 UTC

  • A Few Insights 1 – Sovereignty (handling exceptions) is the cheapest form of gov

    A Few Insights

    1 – Sovereignty (handling exceptions) is the cheapest form of government. It is not the most profitable in the short term, but the cheapest to operate, with the lowest overhead.

    2 – Christianity is successful under Aryanism(Markets), because it produces incentives identical to high trust market incentives.

    3 – I’ve been working on ‘Man as the Measure’ for some time, but over the past few weeks have made a fairly big leap in progress, and I’ve tried the argument out on a few people and it seems to click. One of the examples I use is ‘series’ which create a means of measuring qualitative statements. This continues the general proposition that Testimonial grammar and propertarian ethics produce a language of measurements: testable statements.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 17:15:00 UTC

  • “Rule of law certainly does not depend on democratic principles, but on the mark

    —“Rule of law certainly does not depend on democratic principles, but on the market exchange of fully informed sovereign parties.

    Almost by definition democracy requires that people are duped into believing that ideology runs the world (as opposed to interests) and that politicians and their establishment colleagues form cartels to perpetuate this illusion.

    Case in point: election campaigns have very little connection to what an elected politician will actually pursue in office. The mechanisms at play in the exercise of power are not advertised.

    Instead of institutionalizing swindle we should institutionalize the pursuit of our proper interests.

    What mechanisms are at play in aristocracies?

    Well, at first glance, norms of reproduction and inheritance (multi-generational investments), a degree of nepotism and the threat of violent ousting of rulers when exchange is not reciprocal.

    Because if guns are traded for common suffrage we have a democracy instead.”—Simon Ström

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 17:07:00 UTC

  • Transcendence and Sovereignty Were The Last Pieces

    Yep. Transcendence and Sovereignty were the last pieces. In the end, warriors make rule possible, but Judges rule. In the monopoly of soldiery officers rule, and in the market of cooperation judges rule. Judges and Officers provide the same function under positiva (military) and negativa (market) organizations. The question is only which method judges use to rule. And there is only one scientific, logical, true, and perfectly decidable method by which judges *can* rule, and that is Reciprocity: The Natural Law of Sovereign Men. The west has always been poly-narrative. With each class evolving its own narrative. And with each class narrative justifying its role in the natural law of sovereign men. The cult of sovereignty for the aristocracy, the cult of law for the priesthood of the aristocracy, the cult of philosophy for the middle aspirational classes, and the cult of religion for the laboring classes, and the cult of rejection, rebellion, and escape by the undesirable classes. And in turn, there is only one method of producing Sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and sufficient surplus for subsidy, and this is via the incremental suppression of parasitisms in all its forms, producing sovereign men, and eliminating parasitic men – leaving only means of survival in markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, and production of polities. The monarchy provides the judge of last resort in war, the judiciary the judge of markets, and the officer corps the commander of the monopoly that is war. And so, as long as the men willing and able to fight for sovereignty are trained in, and participate in, a local militia, a regional regimental system, and are trained by a national army, in exchange for rights of public speech, access to territorial and capital ownership, and participation in the choice of commons, then because of their arms and their numbers, no usurper can deprive them of sovereignty; and because of their investment and advantage from it, they will preserve their sovereignty, and because of their universal standing in courts of natural law, they will have incentive and peaceful and productive means of preserving their sovereignty, through the incremental suppression of all parasitism of which they are aware. Men must create a market for the suppression of parasitism, by in turn creating a market for cooperation, because of the market for violence that is the result of a large militia of diverse personal but homogenous collective, interests. There is but one method of obtaining and preserving the sovereignty, necessary for the production of agency, necessary for the transcendence of man, and that is the organization of a franchise (corporation) of warriors of sufficient number, with sufficient incentives, and sufficient institutional means, that the only conditions that prevent conflict and preserve cooperation. The advantage of this order is that we preserve our original innovation: maneuver (what we call today ooda-loops) because of the distribution of decision making to the lowest possible level of the organization: a market for heroism in battle. We developed markets in everything, because markets adapt faster and innovate faster than all alternatives. And for a small population of people, the use of excellence(professionals) and technology (excellence), and markets (maneuver) is simply *faster* in all dimensions than all larger and slower alternatives. He who adapts fastest and best has the advantage. Because the first and last enemy of all is TIME.

  • Transcendence and Sovereignty Were The Last Pieces

    Yep. Transcendence and Sovereignty were the last pieces. In the end, warriors make rule possible, but Judges rule. In the monopoly of soldiery officers rule, and in the market of cooperation judges rule. Judges and Officers provide the same function under positiva (military) and negativa (market) organizations. The question is only which method judges use to rule. And there is only one scientific, logical, true, and perfectly decidable method by which judges *can* rule, and that is Reciprocity: The Natural Law of Sovereign Men. The west has always been poly-narrative. With each class evolving its own narrative. And with each class narrative justifying its role in the natural law of sovereign men. The cult of sovereignty for the aristocracy, the cult of law for the priesthood of the aristocracy, the cult of philosophy for the middle aspirational classes, and the cult of religion for the laboring classes, and the cult of rejection, rebellion, and escape by the undesirable classes. And in turn, there is only one method of producing Sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and sufficient surplus for subsidy, and this is via the incremental suppression of parasitisms in all its forms, producing sovereign men, and eliminating parasitic men – leaving only means of survival in markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, and production of polities. The monarchy provides the judge of last resort in war, the judiciary the judge of markets, and the officer corps the commander of the monopoly that is war. And so, as long as the men willing and able to fight for sovereignty are trained in, and participate in, a local militia, a regional regimental system, and are trained by a national army, in exchange for rights of public speech, access to territorial and capital ownership, and participation in the choice of commons, then because of their arms and their numbers, no usurper can deprive them of sovereignty; and because of their investment and advantage from it, they will preserve their sovereignty, and because of their universal standing in courts of natural law, they will have incentive and peaceful and productive means of preserving their sovereignty, through the incremental suppression of all parasitism of which they are aware. Men must create a market for the suppression of parasitism, by in turn creating a market for cooperation, because of the market for violence that is the result of a large militia of diverse personal but homogenous collective, interests. There is but one method of obtaining and preserving the sovereignty, necessary for the production of agency, necessary for the transcendence of man, and that is the organization of a franchise (corporation) of warriors of sufficient number, with sufficient incentives, and sufficient institutional means, that the only conditions that prevent conflict and preserve cooperation. The advantage of this order is that we preserve our original innovation: maneuver (what we call today ooda-loops) because of the distribution of decision making to the lowest possible level of the organization: a market for heroism in battle. We developed markets in everything, because markets adapt faster and innovate faster than all alternatives. And for a small population of people, the use of excellence(professionals) and technology (excellence), and markets (maneuver) is simply *faster* in all dimensions than all larger and slower alternatives. He who adapts fastest and best has the advantage. Because the first and last enemy of all is TIME.