Theme: Sovereignty

  • The Court for the Dependent. The Parliament for the Independent. 1. Via negativa

    The Court for the Dependent. The Parliament for the Independent.
    1. Via negativa defense by the court is available to anyone.
    2. Via Positiva offense by the Parliament is available by Participation whether direct or by representation, to those who contribute to the commons, by defense, maintenance, and funding.
    3. Only those who demonstrate capacity for managing capital sufficiently for themselves and for others may have influencde in the management of capital for all.

    Reply addressees: @MathPolice


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 20:14:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710388044329623552

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710386204955615578

  • RT @TheStudyofWar: 5/ #Putin’s expressed goal of establishing a multipolar world

    RT @TheStudyofWar: 5/ #Putin’s expressed goal of establishing a multipolar world order further supports ISW’s assessment that Putin’s goals…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 02:39:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710122541283512398

  • RT @TheStudyofWar: 4/ ISW recently evaluated claims that Putin launched the full

    RT @TheStudyofWar: 4/ ISW recently evaluated claims that Putin launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine because he feared NATO and inste…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 02:39:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710122494143656384

  • Mises and rothbard are attempting to replace western rule of law of universal re

    Mises and rothbard are attempting to replace western rule of law of universal reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means, by sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, and duty to this commons before self, with the low trust ethics of the Jewish separatist ghetto, and the ethics of the middle eastern bazaar, where no one is responsibility for the commons, and as such those cultures are incapable of organizing industry or government at scale that is other than corrupt and parasitic upon the people.

    Reply addressees: @ViandeTiede666 @StephaneGeyres @LudwigArisleib @FromKulak @paulericblanrue @arthurhomines


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 21:53:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708963416629469184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708934271174398187

  • Quotable –“A country can be based on words or blood. If it is based on words, i

    Quotable
    –“A country can be based on words or blood. If it is based on words, it cannot allow any serious questioning of those words (as interpreted by the anointed priest class). It cannot allow free speech. All heretics must be suppressed by a permanent inquisition.”–… https://twitter.com/William68332190/status/1708132216331493566

  • EXPLAINING THE HIERARCHY OF LEGAL LEGITIMACY IN THE USA – AND REASON FOR OUR PRE

    EXPLAINING THE HIERARCHY OF LEGAL LEGITIMACY IN THE USA – AND REASON FOR OUR PRESENT CONFLICT

    QUESTION
    —“does it follow from this that court rulings take precedence over federal law and judges can ‘legislate from the bench’ as we’ve been seeing?”–

    (@feafij Are you sure you don’t have a deep understanding of these issues and are just getting me to explain them for the audience? lol Otherwise you’re quite insightful and we need to maybe invest in training you. 😉 )

    ANSWER
    Problem 1: while the constitution is a document that assumes the common law and the natural law as stated by blackstone, which was the legal frame of reference of the age, this is not explictyly stated other than vaguely in the declaration and preamble.
    So, the people are sovereign, meaning they insure one an other’s self determination by self determined means -and sovereign within the limits of the natural law of sovereignty, reciprocity, and duty to sovereignty and reciprocity. All our laws evolve from this simple rule. And that rule is 5000 years old and the core of western civilization and the reason for our difference from the rest.

    Problem 2: the civil war, the great depression, and the communist revolution we call the civil right era, allowed the federal government to deprive states of their rights, and expand it’s powers beyond those which were granted by the constitution or the people by amendment.
    This has led to the conflict that denies that the USA is at least eleven different sub-civilizations, just as is europe, and that the federal government was designed to provide taxes for defense and dispute resolution between these civilizations and the states they are organized into, while leaving the culture and preferences to the states.
    The government is required to guarranteed the bill of rights and a republican government and rule of law, but that is all. WHat has happend is that the governmetn has been captured by activists who wish to produce a monopoly culture across these regions that leads to the natural conflict between large immigrant cities where individuals are powerless because responsibilty is impossible, and suburbs and territories where individuals are not powerless because responsibility is possible.

    SOLUTION
    The solution the present problem is the devolution of the federal government to its original design as a federation that resolved conflicts and provded defnse, but did not try to create homogeneouety of culture, especially because of this culture war against our soverignty, responsibility, institutions, law, traditions and civilization.
    This is what our organizatin is working toward. (Slowly).

    HIERARCHY
    1) The natural law, the sovereign people under that law, the constitution of those people under that law, and the common law process of discovery of agreement on wrongs, take precedent over legislation and regulation – as we have seen – except where explicitly justified by legislation.

    2) Legislation and regulation can modify even the common law, as long as it does not conflict with the constitution.

    3) Due to judicial review, the supreme court is bound by the constitution, the common law (history of law, meaning prescedent), and can invalidate legislation and regulation. Most other thinkers will not state it this way but as you can see with the court’s return to law as a science, the court is requiring that there be some common law precedent if one is to impose anything that would impose upon the constitution or the natural law.

    4) Legal activism, or ‘lawfare’ consisting of efforts to circumvent the people, and the legislature is a violation of our constitution and law, but is a hole that was abused during the 20th by boy lawfare and ‘positive law’, and betwen the federalist society and justice scalia in particular, and the trump appointments to the court that were recommended by the federalist society, the court is trying to gradually ‘undo’ the efforts at ‘legislation from the bench’, and thus return matters to the states. Most activism of the 1960s onward has been catastrophically harmful but the court needs a case before it to rule those behaviors by the court (see Abortion) or the legislature (bussing etc) and hopefully no fault divorce and ending of liability for interference in a marriage, so that these disasters will be reversed over the next decade.

    Note: our organization is trying to plug about eight holes in the cosnstitutiont hat have allowed the undermining of our constitution and law, which are for all intents and puroses and empirical and scientific method of government – and the most empirical and scientific possible for man.

    GENERAL INTERPRETATION
    While my arguments above are more accurate than the simple hierarchy that we follow in most cases – cases that are not fundamental violations of the natural common concurrent law of the US cosntitution: in the United States, that simple hierarchy of laws is generally structured as follows, from highest to lowest authority:

    Hierarchy of Laws
    U.S. Constitution: The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. All other laws, whether federal, state, or local, must comply with the Constitution. Any law found to be in violation of any part of the Constitution is deemed unconstitutional and is therefore invalid.

    Federal Legislation: Federal statutes, also known as acts of Congress, come next in the hierarchy. These laws must be in accordance with the U.S. Constitution. If a federal statute conflicts with the Constitution, the statute is invalidated.

    Federal Regulations: Regulations created by federal agencies are subordinate to federal legislation. These regulations must be authorized by enabling legislation and cannot conflict with either the Constitution or federal statutes.

    State Constitutions: Each state has its own constitution, which is subordinate to the U.S. Constitution. State constitutions provide the framework for state laws and must comply with both federal statutes and the U.S. Constitution.

    State Legislation: State statutes come next and must comply with both the state and U.S. Constitutions. If a state law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law generally takes precedence due to the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

    State Regulations: Similar to federal regulations, state regulations are created by state agencies and must comply with state statutes, state constitutions, and the U.S. Constitution.

    Common Law: Common law, or case law, is created by judicial decisions. These decisions interpret the U.S. Constitution, federal and state statutes, and regulations. Common law is considered the “lowest” form of law in this hierarchy but plays a crucial role in interpreting and filling gaps in statutes and regulations.

    Findings of the Court: Court decisions contribute to the body of common law. Lower court decisions are binding only within their jurisdiction and can be overruled by higher courts. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions are final and set precedents that all other courts must follow.

    Key Points
    Judicial Review: Courts have the power to review and possibly invalidate government actions that violate the Constitution, federal or state statutes, or corresponding regulations.

    Stare Decisis: This is the principle that courts should generally abide by precedent. However, higher courts have the authority to overturn precedents, and even the U.S. Supreme Court has reversed its own decisions.

    Conflict of Laws: When there’s a conflict between different levels of law, the higher level generally takes precedence. For example, federal laws trump state laws due to the Supremacy Clause.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 00:45:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706832524243070976

  • If we are sovereign as a people and the government works for us as employees, th

    If we are sovereign as a people and the government works for us as employees, that means that no one can tell us what to do unless we have all agreed on it – either in what not to do by the discovery of what is bad in court, or the discovery of what we agreed is good in…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 22:47:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706802582721634569

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706800704352813469

  • THE COMING MASS REVOCATION, DENATURALIZATION, AND REPATRIATION CITIZENSHIP While

    THE COMING MASS REVOCATION, DENATURALIZATION, AND REPATRIATION

    CITIZENSHIP
    While residency and citizenship have historically been two separate terms, for two separate classes. Meaning that residents are subject to via negativa legal defense, but only citizens are privilegd to participate in via positiva legislation and administration.

    Under modern mass democracy we have merged these two terms, granting everyone the franchise whether contributing to it, invested in it, responsible for maintaining it – and even granted it to those unfit for it, hostile to it, and aggressively seeking to undermine it. And worse, we have ended the use of houses of government as a market between the classes, and then worse, we have not created a house of labor or women when those classes have hostile interests to the productive, and territorial leadership classes. We have created a race to the bottom that has destroyed every attempt at democracy in history.

    So at present, Citizenship, meaning, permission to reside in a territory, being insured by the insurer of last resort – the state, contributing taxes and receiving benefits, is and always has been revokable – denaturalization into statelessness, just as defense by the people and the state has been revokable – a designation of outlaw.

    REVOKATION
    Historically, we removed the muslims from spain. We removed the jews repeatedly from most countries. We deported one another en masse during the era of nation state formation. All governments have relocated hostile, problematic, unfit, people around the world throughout history. More recently, the Dominicans revoked citizenship and removed the Hatians. We have departed kingdoms and territories (not countries) we had colonized, after forming them into countries.

    CRISIS
    It is almost absolutely positively certain that this process will repeat as soon as the anglo american unification of the planet during the age of sail, the industrial revolution, and the world wars that ended the age of agrarian empires – attempting to usher in the modern age of nation states, and the rules based interanational order that’s dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty and disease. That order should have ended in 92, instad of celebrating the false victory and claims of end of history. Instead the enemy pulled out all the stops starting with the obama presidency, his invitation of a very selct and biased group of economists to the white house, and by doing nothing at all to prevent the rise of opposition abroad, while encouraging it at home – just as his church of hatred of white civilization had preached. He followed their scripture.

    The age of debt expansion ends with the age of population expansion. The age of hyperconsumption and redistribution ends at the same time. And with it the tolerance for those unfit for western civilization and it’s institutions of ‘whiteness’ – a term which is a hostile slur for our civilization’s institutions and traditions that indoctrinate and require each person bear the maximum possible responsiblity for both private and common – thus forcing all of us to insure everything in the high trust civilization or be deprived of our rights within it.

    PREDICTIONS
    I have an enviable record of prediction, and it’s not as if the movement we began in the early nineties, escalating in the early oughts, is other than expanding rapidly in the public consciousness as our experiment with the pretense of the end of scarcity and equality between sexes classes and peoples continues to hit the wall of the exhaustion of the few economic generations of temporarhy privilege created by industrialization and the anglo american unification of the world in trade – ending the age of agrarian empires and their monopoly on trade and trade routes.

    I have had a very difficult time with prediction over the past few years as acceleration and crisis drowns the data in noise impossible to peer through. I was very far off with China, who, I didn’t believe could survive this long. I was too optimistic about russia and had greater confidence that we would finally unite rusian resources with german technology – mostly so that Russia, demographically, and economically, could simply survive.

    I had expected a narrow Hillary election victory – and an administration fully completing the transformation to political Leninism (Hillary’s a Leninist are are most Democrats today) to cause a revolution that would spiral – and it was the proper timing for it to occur with the least harm – well before we encounter the 2025-2030(5?) coincidence of cycles that will without question create some sort of catastrophic reorganization.

    While Trump was correct on his international and economic policy (as well as immigration) and correctly restructured geostrategy and sought to repatriate and restore the american working and middle classes, (and while he was clearly not expecting to win, or he would have spent a year putting together a team willing to push through policy), he actually took wind out of the sails of the fomenting revolution, and caused the radical left and their allies in the democratic party, credentialist (deep) state, academy, and media, to double down an accelerate with the activist terrorism of BLM and Antifa. But covid gave them the excuse to destroy the economy and end trump’s achievement. Which, as I predicted and tried (at personal harm) to popularize and defend against, they then used to suppress all public political discourse as thorougly as the soviets then and the Chinese now. Again, label it as you want, but in technical terms it’s Leninism.

    So, while it takes a greate deal of general knowledge to predict long term trends and the intersection of cycles, it’s impossible to predict timing – almost entirely because it’s impossible to judge the rate of adaptation of the population to the circumstances at hand to the deterministic outcome that they’re heading into against their wishes or their understanding – and their overwhelming desire to bury heads in the sand instead.

    So since there are so many of us in the business of predicting these cycles now that for those of us with knowledge of the subject, our date ranges are converging.

    And some should take comfort in that we are, at least the anglosphere is, as naval rather than ‘world island’ powers, most insulated from the coming crisis. And in america we will profit from it.

    That said we will ether devolve as I have recommended and worked toward, into a federation that the founders intended, with common rule of law between states, and minimum rights within, yet total local control over social economic and cultural life – or we will war untili more than ten million – maybe many more – are dead. And while that is happening all the pent up wants and fantasies of those less moral than we, will be expressed as wars of aggression and predation upon one another, and the world costs of everything will reach levels that cause starvation to return as certainly and as thorougly as the black plague.

    So you know, I kinda want to fix this problem peacefully before any of that has a chance to happen.

    And we can’t do it until the public needs far less of a lever to motivate them to understand and willingly accept the necessary change” that the usa isn’t and never was a country, but a federation of countries, (states), agreeing to the same terms, so that we could capture this contient for our mutual gain despite our differences in wants and needs and ambitions.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 18:05:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705644507084050432

  • RT @NoahRevoy: If you can have mass immigration against the wishes of the native

    RT @NoahRevoy: If you can have mass immigration against the wishes of the native population you can have mass repatriation against the wish…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 01:44:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705397723095028197

  • Ask Alberta to join the USA and guarantee the preservation of their health care

    Ask Alberta to join the USA and guarantee the preservation of their health care system at the state level. Weill get everyone except lower Ontario and Quebec – who nobody wants anyway. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-22 21:33:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705334588552143169

    Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson @ABDanielleSmith

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705334053182812607