Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • THE ONLY HILL FOR ARISTOCRACY TO STAND UPON. The only hill to stand upon is whet

    THE ONLY HILL FOR ARISTOCRACY TO STAND UPON.

    The only hill to stand upon is whether we receive in reciprocity the same right to self determination that others demand of us. Either we have the same right to self determination or we are conquered, and the victims of genocide. So, if we are not to receive the same reciprocity – we must separate. To separate we must revolt. To revolt to use war. To use war in the current era does not require we use it against people, but against infrastructure. 3 minutes of air, 3 days of water, 3 hours of power 3 weeks of food, 3 months of stress. It takes 90 days to act. The problem is a leadership that will act to cause a revolution, and a sufficient number of men who will act independently rather than rally (like schoolgirls) to war against infrastructure that makes the pretense of power visible.

    There is only one choice: the entire territory, or some part of it. IMO some part of it is preferable. And a part of it with ports, it’s own electrical grid, and a low cost of defense is the best place to start (texas).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-27 10:59:00 UTC

  • The Only Hill For Aristocracy To Stand Upon.

    The only hill to stand upon is whether we receive in reciprocity the same right to self determination that others demand of us. Either we have the same right to self determination or we are conquered, and the victims of genocide. So, if we are not to receive the same reciprocity – we must separate. To separate we must revolt. To revolt to use war. To use war in the current era does not require we use it against people, but against infrastructure. 3 minutes of air, 3 days of water, 3 hours of power 3 weeks of food, 3 months of stress. It takes 90 days to act. The problem is a leadership that will act to cause a revolution, and a sufficient number of men who will act independently rather than rally (like schoolgirls) to war against infrastructure that makes the pretense of power visible. There is only one choice: the entire territory, or some part of it. IMO some part of it is preferable. And a part of it with ports, it’s own electrical grid, and a low cost of defense is the best place to start (texas).

  • The Only Hill For Aristocracy To Stand Upon.

    The only hill to stand upon is whether we receive in reciprocity the same right to self determination that others demand of us. Either we have the same right to self determination or we are conquered, and the victims of genocide. So, if we are not to receive the same reciprocity – we must separate. To separate we must revolt. To revolt to use war. To use war in the current era does not require we use it against people, but against infrastructure. 3 minutes of air, 3 days of water, 3 hours of power 3 weeks of food, 3 months of stress. It takes 90 days to act. The problem is a leadership that will act to cause a revolution, and a sufficient number of men who will act independently rather than rally (like schoolgirls) to war against infrastructure that makes the pretense of power visible. There is only one choice: the entire territory, or some part of it. IMO some part of it is preferable. And a part of it with ports, it’s own electrical grid, and a low cost of defense is the best place to start (texas).

  • Hence, devolve the federal government to insurer of last resort and return to st

    Hence, devolve the federal government to insurer of last resort and return to states, control over norms lost during the civil war. The constitution was constructed from natural law (reciprocity). Restore it. That’s why we fight: incompatible group evolutionary strategies.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 03:02:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945489990972305408

    Reply addressees: @conradhackett

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942639410599821312

    IN REPLY TO:

    @conradhackett

    California’s economy is bigger than the economy of each purple country
    https://t.co/kKpo2IJNky https://t.co/JSDemLVSXJ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942639410599821312

  • Is There Any Army In The History Of Mankind (past Or Present) That Could Possibly Defeat The United States As It Stands Today? What About As It Was In 1950?

    No army on earth can defeat the russians in a ground war. It is impossible.
    No country can defeat a stockpile of nuclear weapons. Ergo, Russia, USA, and China cannot be ‘defeated’ without suicidal consequences. Although Russians and Chinese have long records of killing off their own people – which is what concerns westerners.

    That said, there is no power on earth today, nor none in history that can survive a war with the united states – given any time. The only way to attack a country like the USA is with a surprise and deeply. Even so, that would mean suicide.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-army-in-the-history-of-mankind-past-or-present-that-could-possibly-defeat-the-United-States-as-it-stands-today-What-about-as-it-was-in-1950

  • Is China Stronger Than America?

    China is a very poor country. But it has more population than the Western world, more population than the African world, about the same or more than the Indian world, less population than the Muslim world, and perhaps most importantly, greater racial and cultural homogeneity than any other people other than the japanese – and that’s coupled with a ‘self righteous’ military, a history and culture of monolithic bureaucracy; no history whatsoever of what we call ‘rule of law’ or individual rights (sovereignty), or peerage; And a severe ‘chip on its shoulder’ for having been backward, and the loser of modern wars, and the poor choice of communism, which is contrary to the Chinese cultural ‘mythos’ that china is the ‘Center of the World’.

    So while it is easy for china to ‘catch up from behind’ using authoritarianism, it is very hard to produce a constantly competitive, and constantly evolving economy given ‘chinese characteristics’. (WHich I won’t go into)

    Can china use her central bureaucracy to concentrate capital in industry and military to achieve by threat, bribery, and obstruction, that which the west achieved by technical innovation, economic expansion, and ‘dragging the world out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, poverty, and disease?’

    Of course she can.

    And there are more nations in this world that do not want meritocracy than do so. And china, russia, and islam, seem poised to conflict with the west, india, and christian africa.

    I think the period of the west’s ideals has ended and the future belongs to non-market nations.

    Democracy, Liberty, Innovation, Individualism, are western if not scandinavian (english) preoccupations.

    The north sea people are, quite honestly, sons of cattle raiders, pirates, vikings, and warriors. It’s a materialistic heritage.

    Most people had no such luxury.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-China-stronger-than-America

  • Is There Any Army In The History Of Mankind (past Or Present) That Could Possibly Defeat The United States As It Stands Today? What About As It Was In 1950?

    No army on earth can defeat the russians in a ground war. It is impossible.
    No country can defeat a stockpile of nuclear weapons. Ergo, Russia, USA, and China cannot be ‘defeated’ without suicidal consequences. Although Russians and Chinese have long records of killing off their own people – which is what concerns westerners.

    That said, there is no power on earth today, nor none in history that can survive a war with the united states – given any time. The only way to attack a country like the USA is with a surprise and deeply. Even so, that would mean suicide.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-army-in-the-history-of-mankind-past-or-present-that-could-possibly-defeat-the-United-States-as-it-stands-today-What-about-as-it-was-in-1950

  • Is China Stronger Than America?

    China is a very poor country. But it has more population than the Western world, more population than the African world, about the same or more than the Indian world, less population than the Muslim world, and perhaps most importantly, greater racial and cultural homogeneity than any other people other than the japanese – and that’s coupled with a ‘self righteous’ military, a history and culture of monolithic bureaucracy; no history whatsoever of what we call ‘rule of law’ or individual rights (sovereignty), or peerage; And a severe ‘chip on its shoulder’ for having been backward, and the loser of modern wars, and the poor choice of communism, which is contrary to the Chinese cultural ‘mythos’ that china is the ‘Center of the World’.

    So while it is easy for china to ‘catch up from behind’ using authoritarianism, it is very hard to produce a constantly competitive, and constantly evolving economy given ‘chinese characteristics’. (WHich I won’t go into)

    Can china use her central bureaucracy to concentrate capital in industry and military to achieve by threat, bribery, and obstruction, that which the west achieved by technical innovation, economic expansion, and ‘dragging the world out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, poverty, and disease?’

    Of course she can.

    And there are more nations in this world that do not want meritocracy than do so. And china, russia, and islam, seem poised to conflict with the west, india, and christian africa.

    I think the period of the west’s ideals has ended and the future belongs to non-market nations.

    Democracy, Liberty, Innovation, Individualism, are western if not scandinavian (english) preoccupations.

    The north sea people are, quite honestly, sons of cattle raiders, pirates, vikings, and warriors. It’s a materialistic heritage.

    Most people had no such luxury.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-China-stronger-than-America

  • “He who can destroy a thing, owns a thing.” Revolutions determine ownership. Rev

    “He who can destroy a thing, owns a thing.” Revolutions determine ownership. Revolutions are improbable in prospect and deterministic in retrospect. Revolution Comes!!! #Trump #Conservative

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-12 16:20:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/940617382845992965

  • My answer to If in the near future India, China, and Russia unites together, how

    My answer to If in the near future India, China, and Russia unites together, how long would it take them to defeat t… https://www.quora.com/If-in-the-near-future-India-China-and-Russia-unites-together-how-long-would-it-take-them-to-defeat-the-U-S-and-U-K-together/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=ca71a6f5

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-07 23:32:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938914071591743488