Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • How Come White Australians Have Control Of Australia, Like White Prime Minster And White Laws? Shouldn’t Aboriginals Have Control Of It? It’s Their Land, Not The White British.

    Ownership always and everywhere is determined by those who possess the capacity of violence sufficient to make such determination.

    Adults make economic statements. Children make moral statements. Children make moral statements because they lack the knowledge and resources to make economic statements. And that is what separates adults, infantilized adults, and children.

    https://www.quora.com/How-come-white-Australians-have-control-of-Australia-like-white-prime-minster-and-white-laws-Shouldnt-Aboriginals-have-control-of-it-Its-their-land-not-the-white-British

  • Why Does The World Allow America To Rule Alaska?

    Because, “Ivan”, for the same reason China lets Russia rule anything east of the urals. And the same reason Muscovy rules the former Golden Horde territories, and the same reason Muscovy rules former Novgorod, and the same reason Muscovy rules Kaliningrad (which we will someday correct), and the same reason Muscovy rules Crimea, and the same reason Muscovy DOESN”T rule eastern europe any longer.

    Becuase decisions are made by the capacity to conduct and preserve the violence necessary to rule.

    The last people on earth to make judgements of others are the Russians.

    You killed millions of your own, and set your self back a century, then set back eastern europe by a century. Spread the disease of markxism around the world at the cost of 100M lives.

    You didn’t protect us from the germans. The germans were trying to protect us from you.

    Why on earth the Anglos didn’t let you conquer and retake Turkey is beyond me.

    Why we didn’t overthrow and modernize you at the end of the world war is merely one of the great follies in history. Had we continued to moscow and Beijing we would have cut the number of murders you caused in half.

    Own it. Your national mythology is an out and out lie. Your national hero was one of the most evil men ever to walk the earth. The germans were right.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-world-allow-America-to-rule-Alaska

  • Why Does The World Allow America To Rule Alaska?

    Because, “Ivan”, for the same reason China lets Russia rule anything east of the urals. And the same reason Muscovy rules the former Golden Horde territories, and the same reason Muscovy rules former Novgorod, and the same reason Muscovy rules Kaliningrad (which we will someday correct), and the same reason Muscovy rules Crimea, and the same reason Muscovy DOESN”T rule eastern europe any longer.

    Becuase decisions are made by the capacity to conduct and preserve the violence necessary to rule.

    The last people on earth to make judgements of others are the Russians.

    You killed millions of your own, and set your self back a century, then set back eastern europe by a century. Spread the disease of markxism around the world at the cost of 100M lives.

    You didn’t protect us from the germans. The germans were trying to protect us from you.

    Why on earth the Anglos didn’t let you conquer and retake Turkey is beyond me.

    Why we didn’t overthrow and modernize you at the end of the world war is merely one of the great follies in history. Had we continued to moscow and Beijing we would have cut the number of murders you caused in half.

    Own it. Your national mythology is an out and out lie. Your national hero was one of the most evil men ever to walk the earth. The germans were right.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-world-allow-America-to-rule-Alaska

  • Violence is neither good nor bad – it is a resource put to ends good or bad. Sel

    Violence is neither good nor bad – it is a resource put to ends good or bad. Self determination is certainly a good if not best end. Violence to obtain self determination against ethnocide, civilization-cide, and genocide, a necessary, virtuous and heroic end. #Revolution, #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-26 13:26:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/956881117101068288

    Reply addressees: @JakWilllson @HbdNrx

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/956821897907490816

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/956821897907490816

  • OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distribu

    OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign warriors.

    I don’t think a constitutional oligarchy matters – it might be good. it’s not as good as a constitutional monarchy. The problems are (a) democracy (b) freedom of false speech, (c) ability to circumvent of rule of law of reciprocity due to the frailty of the constitution, (d) the loss of universal standing in matters of the commons (we can’t sue politicians and bureaucrats), (e) we have no mechanism for evolving necessary monopoly bureaucracy into competitive private organizations once institutionalized (habituated). (f) the failure to modernize the fiat money system for direct distribution of liquidity to consumers rather than through credit in the financial system. (g) it has been possible to forcibly ‘convert’ the population from the nuclear family and civic responsibility, and immigrate the underclasses the country was designed to escape from (not to mention the civil rights acts, and the civil war) which caused forced integration).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-25 08:02:00 UTC

  • OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distribu

    OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign warriors. I don’t think a constitutional oligarchy matters – it might be good. it’s not as good as a constitutional monarchy. The problems are (a) democracy (b) freedom of false speech, (c) ability to circumvent of rule of law of reciprocity due to the frailty of the constitution, (d) the loss of universal standing in matters of the commons (we can’t sue politicians and bureaucrats), (e) we have no mechanism for evolving necessary monopoly bureaucracy into competitive private organizations once institutionalized (habituated). (f) the failure to modernize the fiat money system for direct distribution of liquidity to consumers rather than through credit in the financial system. (g) it has been possible to forcibly ‘convert’ the population from the nuclear family and civic responsibility, and immigrate the underclasses the country was designed to escape from (not to mention the civil rights acts, and the civil war) which caused forced integration).

  • OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distribu

    OLIGARCHY DOESN”T MATTER. ALL DISCRETIONARY RULE IS BAD. NOMOCRACY: the distributed dictatorship of sovereign warriors. I don’t think a constitutional oligarchy matters – it might be good. it’s not as good as a constitutional monarchy. The problems are (a) democracy (b) freedom of false speech, (c) ability to circumvent of rule of law of reciprocity due to the frailty of the constitution, (d) the loss of universal standing in matters of the commons (we can’t sue politicians and bureaucrats), (e) we have no mechanism for evolving necessary monopoly bureaucracy into competitive private organizations once institutionalized (habituated). (f) the failure to modernize the fiat money system for direct distribution of liquidity to consumers rather than through credit in the financial system. (g) it has been possible to forcibly ‘convert’ the population from the nuclear family and civic responsibility, and immigrate the underclasses the country was designed to escape from (not to mention the civil rights acts, and the civil war) which caused forced integration).

  • anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution. Sovereignti

    anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution.

    Sovereigntist = territorialist = winners of the aristocratic revolution.

    The weak always complain about paying the cost of holding territory so that they can impose the order of property rights the strong desire.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-23 22:14:00 UTC

  • anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution. Sovereignti

    anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution. Sovereigntist = territorialist = winners of the aristocratic revolution. The weak always complain about paying the cost of holding territory so that they can impose the order of property rights the strong desire.

  • anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution. Sovereignti

    anarchist = pastoralist = the losers of the aristocratic revolution. Sovereigntist = territorialist = winners of the aristocratic revolution. The weak always complain about paying the cost of holding territory so that they can impose the order of property rights the strong desire.