Theme: Sovereignty

  • Why Do We Own A Rifle?

    1 – To continue the evolutionary progress of my people by preventing the usurpation of sovereignty of my kin by foreign invasion whether normative, cultural, religious, institutional, military, or demographic. 2 – To overthrow governments that by accumulated impositions of convenience incrementally deprive us of our rights as englishmen (warriors of the militia), and to replace it with a new generation of government that restores those rights: a) reciprocity without exception, b) universal standing, and c) universal applicability. 3 – To prevent the low from profiting by the criminal, unethical, and immoral. 4 – To levy retribution upon and demand restitution of the wicked. 5 – To prevent the indolent, lazy, and inferior from parasitism upon the private and common: my kin’s production of the intergenerational family and its assets. both personal, private, shareheld, common, and political. Western civilization began, evolved, and is maintained by nothing more than the militia. This is what differentiates the west from the rest. All that is unique and exceptional about western civilization from our law, our reason, our science, our institutions, our culture, and our mythology, begins with the distribution of capital and our intolerance for its centralization. Period. Ergo, the a personal rifle capable of war, revolution, prosecution, conviction, restitution and defense, is the minimum necessary arms by which a member of the militia persists the civlization of the militia: the west. And he who would demote the militia or disarm it by definition declares war on me, my kin, my people, my state, and civilization, and by proxy, all mankind – given our disproportionate contribution to dragging humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, infant morality, early death, disease, and tyranny. There is no greater crime against humanity than to deprive me of my weaponry. If you declare war on me and mine we will, without exception withdraw our consent, and damage, harm, kill any and al that you hold dear. I AM SOVEREIGN. ALL MILITIA ARE SOVEREIGN. WE ARE SOVEREIGNTY BY THE SINGLE LAW OF RECIPROCITY IN ALL THINGS INCLUDING THE RECIPROCAL INSURANCE OF ONE ANOTHER’S SOVEREIGNTY BY FORCE OF ARMS.
  • Your Home Country’s Economy Is Destroyed. Which Country Do You Move To And Why?

    I don’t move anywhere. I organize a group of willing peers and seek to take over the government and correct matters for the benefit of my people

    Cowards run, and deserve no quarter.

    https://www.quora.com/Your-home-countrys-economy-is-destroyed-Which-country-do-you-move-to-and-why

  • Leaders produce leaders, not followers. Truth, Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity,

    Leaders produce leaders, not followers. Truth, Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets in Everything.

    Propertarianism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-05 09:35:00 UTC

  • Leaders produce leaders, not followers. Truth, Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity,

    Leaders produce leaders, not followers. Truth, Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets in Everything. Propertarianism.
  • Leaders produce leaders, not followers. Truth, Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity,

    Leaders produce leaders, not followers. Truth, Agency, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets in Everything. Propertarianism.
  • The net effect of western civilization’s unique combination Truth, Sovereignty,

    The net effect of western civilization’s unique combination Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, and Markets is eugenic evolution by the continuous upward distribution of reproduction, and therefore the institutionalized production of Agency via the domestication of man. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 12:57:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970282049381822464

  • The only solution to the incompatibility of group evolutionary strategies, is to

    The only solution to the incompatibility of group evolutionary strategies, is to revolt and separate, so that the affordability of group specialization loosed by the harnessing of hydrocarbons and electricity, is not inhibited by our incompatible demands of the commons. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-03 15:44:00 UTC

  • Neoconservatism(Prohibition on Sovereignty), Libertarianism Prohibition on the c

    Neoconservatism(Prohibition on Sovereignty), Libertarianism Prohibition on the commons), and Marxism (prohibition upon property) are just three class directed methods of parasitism – The Pilpul of Abrahamic Religion in Pseudoscientific Verse.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-02 23:56:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969723240296927237

    Reply addressees: @Neocon_Pundit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/967949691617816576


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/967949691617816576

  • The question is not whether we shall have another acrimonious election, but how

    The question is not whether we shall have another acrimonious election, but how we cease to have elections which are acrimonious, by dissolution of an imperial government no longer in our kinship interests. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-02 23:34:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969717491315478529

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”— It depends upon two factors: a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot. I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.