Theme: Sovereignty
-
Igor Markov’s answer: Russia wants the US to give it free reign in what Russia c
Igor Markov’s answer: Russia wants the US to give it free reign in what Russia considers its sphere of influence — ex-USSR countries, plus Serbia, plus Syria, plus Libya, Cuba, Venezuela, etc. Russia also wants to expand its influence in Europe, suppress competition in several energy markets (nat…. -
Question Part Three: Why does a monopoly continental government provide better t
Question Part Three: Why does a monopoly continental government provide better technological, economic, political, and normative results than multiple regional or local governments that specialize to produce commons preferential to members and undesirable by other peoples?
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 00:54:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975535993246834688
Reply addressees: @JonHaidt
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973617420366643212
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973617420366643212
-
The result of truth and sovereignty: the only possible conflict resolution is re
The result of truth and sovereignty: the only possible conflict resolution is reciprocity, and the result is markets in all aspects of life. And markets calculate and adapt constantly and minimize the rents that can prevent adaptation that stultified the rest of the world.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 16:27:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975408268850946049
Reply addressees: @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975407514475954176
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@sapinker If you understand this single principle you will understand what separated the west from the rest: the sovereignty of individual men (warriors) in a kin group, who compete against others by the use of empirical truth regardless of its impact on the dominance hierarchy.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975407514475954176
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@sapinker If you understand this single principle you will understand what separated the west from the rest: the sovereignty of individual men (warriors) in a kin group, who compete against others by the use of empirical truth regardless of its impact on the dominance hierarchy.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975407514475954176
-
If you understand this single principle you will understand what separated the w
If you understand this single principle you will understand what separated the west from the rest: the sovereignty of individual men (warriors) in a kin group, who compete against others by the use of empirical truth regardless of its impact on the dominance hierarchy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 16:24:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975407514475954176
Reply addressees: @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975406156230414336
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@sapinker Only bad mothers think their children have a right to their illusions – they do so as a means of reducing motherly costs of high investment parenting: Subjecting children to a continuous stream of challenges they overcome by the development of agency using will over intuition.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975406156230414336
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@sapinker Only bad mothers think their children have a right to their illusions – they do so as a means of reducing motherly costs of high investment parenting: Subjecting children to a continuous stream of challenges they overcome by the development of agency using will over intuition.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/975406156230414336
-
No militia (armed male population) is defeatable once possessed of gunpowder. To
No militia (armed male population) is defeatable once possessed of gunpowder. Today no militia is defeatable with rifles and rpg’s. That’s just the evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 14:46:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975382943882448901
Reply addressees: @capital_matter @JordanPeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975381825802694656
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975381825802694656
-
The rise of the nation state was made possible by fiat money. Empires expand by
The rise of the nation state was made possible by fiat money. Empires expand by conquest in order to suppress rents on trade and localize them, just as governments evolve by suppressing local rents (parasitism),centralizing them,and then using them to pay for cost of suppression.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 15:51:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975036964348026881
Reply addressees: @Jory_Nal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975035636569772034
IN REPLY TO:
@Jory_Nal
@curtdoolittle Historically empires arose as a means to regulate trade by sea or long vulnerable land routes.
UK in 20th century proved that many small countries could still follow common law, protect sea trade, respond in coordinated way to disaster, without one big Navy. But…the Falklands.Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975035636569772034
-
Ergo, there is no condition under which untruthful speech does not violate recip
Ergo, there is no condition under which untruthful speech does not violate reciprocity and therefore sovereignty, and therefore insurance of reciprocity and sovereignty. Either you can warranty your words our you are externalizing costs of doing so onto others.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 15:38:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975033664881987584
Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197
-
So you mean, you don’t understand semantics, grammar, consistency, correspondenc
So you mean, you don’t understand semantics, grammar, consistency, correspondence, coherence, parsimony and falsifiability?The only requirement for a libertarian identity is sovereignty, and therefore reciprocity, and therefore reciprocal insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 15:37:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975033290183839744
Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197
-
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Russians (and Putin) were restoring their influence and
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Russians (and Putin) were restoring their influence and status in the world. Prior to 2013, Putin was the most respected politician in the world, an idol of the american right, and on the cover of magazines as a hero. The problem was, that when the Ukrainian Maidan Revol… -
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Russians (and Putin) were restoring their influence and
Curt Doolittle’s answer: Russians (and Putin) were restoring their influence and status in the world. Prior to 2013, Putin was the most respected politician in the world, an idol of the american right, and on the cover of magazines as a hero. The problem was, that when the Ukrainian Maidan Revol…